• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

At What Point Can We Get Rid of the Clinic?

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
J

jmdirt

Dec 6, 2013
7,904
6,823
23,180
Will cycling ever be able to be viewed without a clinic eye? What will it take to keep us from wrinkling up our foreheads over performances? 10% slower times for comparable courses? Two K slower average speed for comparable courses? What supplements do we stamp with an OK? Why? I don't ever expect (top) professional athletes to be squeaky clean, but what is the limit?

I'm just thinking/typing out loud...
 
SeriousSam

SeriousSam

Aug 31, 2012
7,550
3
0
Top performances requiring very rare traits if clean is just another reason to think the top guys are doping. As far as I know, this type of calculation is only done in cycling. But people in other sports dope too. In many sports, they dope more than cyclists. Averages going down doesn't mean much because human sport isn't about absolute levels of performance. It's about relative levels, being better than someone else.

Thus the incentive to dope will always be strong and in the absence of testing counteracting that, the incidence of doping will always be high. It's hard to envision most athletes in any sport being clean. It could only happen with a paradigm change in the ability to detect PED use.
 
J

jmdirt

Dec 6, 2013
7,904
6,823
23,180
Re:

Dazed and Confused said:
Why would any serious and hardcore cycling fan get rid of the clinic?

Sure, a "filter" is needed just like in any other place on the internet etc.

Where is the Hog?
Click to expand...

Maybe I should have said will cycling ever get to the point that we don't NEED the clinic? What would that point be?
 
gooner

gooner

Mar 25, 2013
5,389
0
0
There will always be doping in sport.

It's the level of degree to its use which will regularly be in question.
 
O

OldCranky

Jul 27, 2014
139
127
9,030
Re:

hrotha said:
We'll always need The Clinic because cycling will always have a past.

(And probably a present; but just for the sake of argument)
Click to expand...

That was basically my answer. There hasn't been a day since the birth of cycling as a professional sport (or indeed an amateur one) when riders haven't sought to gain performance advances through dubious means, so why would I believe that such a day will arrive in the future?

Goldman is relevant here. As long as 50% or more of sportsmen would be happy to take a drug that guaranteed a win, even if it would kill them within 5 years, the clinic will be needed. Goldman's study was done with track althletes if I recall; I wouldn't be surprised if his typical 50% figure wasn't higher for cycling given how much the history of the sport is steeped in doping. Yes even compared to track and field.
 
King Boonen

King Boonen

Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,966
25,680
Re: Re:

OldCranky said:
hrotha said:
We'll always need The Clinic because cycling will always have a past.

(And probably a present; but just for the sake of argument)
Click to expand...

That was basically my answer. There hasn't been a day since the birth of cycling as a professional sport (or indeed an amateur one) when riders haven't sought to gain performance advances through dubious means, so why would I believe that such a day will arrive in the future?

Goldman is relevant here. As long as 50% or more of sportsmen would be happy to take a drug that guaranteed a win, even if it would kill them within 5 years, the clinic will be needed. Goldman's study was done with track althletes if I recall; I wouldn't be surprised if his typical 50% figure wasn't higher for cycling given how much the history of the sport is steeped in doping. Yes even compared to track and field.
Click to expand...


Pretty sure no one was ever able to repeat Goldmans work though.
 
J

jmdirt

Dec 6, 2013
7,904
6,823
23,180
As we all agree cycling, just like other pro sports, has had, and will continue to have people trying whatever it takes to win. With that being said, I don't think that Froome is any dirtier than anyone else in the platoon he just happens to be winning.
 
blackcat

blackcat

Mar 13, 2009
16,854
2
0
Re: Re:

King Boonen said:
Pretty sure no one was ever able to repeat Goldmans work though.
Click to expand...
partly it is because of social engineering. and you get the people like Cavendish who have learned to provide bromides and motherhood statements on anti-doping.

an anonymous questionnaire you say?

a survey is never anonymous, you have to first deal with the subject lying to him/her self.
 
K

keeponrollin

Jul 10, 2012
421
5
9,285
Re:

dwyatt said:
Once genetically engineered humans are a reality - becuase then you just have to give up.
Click to expand...

Or the UCI under new president-for-life, Sir Dave Brailsford, give up the pretense of clean cycling & allow full on unrestricted doping ....
at which point the clinic becomes a place where cynics play, 'spot the clean cyclist' ...
 
DirtyWorks

DirtyWorks

Feb 10, 2010
10,645
20
22,510
Re: Re:

jmdirt said:
Dazed and Confused said:
Why would any serious and hardcore cycling fan get rid of the clinic?

Sure, a "filter" is needed just like in any other place on the internet etc.

Where is the Hog?
Click to expand...

Maybe I should have said will cycling ever get to the point that we don't NEED the clinic? What would that point be?
Click to expand...

Never. Too much money at the sports federation's level with doping being a nice revenue generator.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom