no it isn't, its a stupid questionBye Bye Bicycle said:This is a very important question; I'm glad that we finally have a thread to discuss this issue...
If you watched South Park, you would knowStryderHells said:Who Would Win In A Fight, Jesus Or The Easter Bunny?
That's how I feel about this thread![]()
rick james said:no it isn't, its a stupid questionBye Bye Bicycle said:This is a very important question; I'm glad that we finally have a thread to discuss this issue...
I think you are underestimating 2014 Nibali a bit. It's possible that would have been beaten but you are saying that as if thats for sure.PremierAndrew said:Neither of them wouldve won without those crashes, but at least Gilbert was arguably the best rider on the startlist in the first place
Red Rick said:Why....
Gigs_98 said:I think you are underestimating 2014 Nibali a bit. It's possible that would have been beaten but you are saying that as if thats for sure.PremierAndrew said:Neither of them wouldve won without those crashes, but at least Gilbert was arguably the best rider on the startlist in the first place
Mr.White said:Not comparable. Guy won 4 stages and with 7min advantage! To top that you need a Ronde/Roubaix double, no solo ride can challenge that!
Nibali has always been better on longer climbs than sorter climbs. The times he put in Risoul and Hautacam (especially this one) were more than enough to stay with Bertie and 2013 Froome.PremierAndrew said:Gigs_98 said:I think you are underestimating 2014 Nibali a bit. It's possible that would have been beaten but you are saying that as if thats for sure.PremierAndrew said:Neither of them wouldve won without those crashes, but at least Gilbert was arguably the best rider on the startlist in the first place
That seems to be the way to express an opinion on this forum these days :lol:
But fwiw, Contador was able to drop Nibs off his wheel on a cat 3 before crashing out. Even without a temporary alliance between Froome and Contador, the 2 mins Nibs gained on the cobbles wouldnt have lasted long on the harder stuff
El Pistolero said:Mr.White said:Not comparable. Guy won 4 stages and with 7min advantage! To top that you need a Ronde/Roubaix double, no solo ride can challenge that!
The two best riders, besides Nibali, crashed out, so it's not that surprising he won with such an advantage.
Philippe Gilbert won the Ronde van Vlaanderen with a solo of 56 km, the longest since Eddy Merckx in 1969. I'm sure Armstrong won a couple of Tours with a bigger advantage than that. So Nibali's win is more prestigious, but Gilbert's win is more impressive.
Tour de France > 2 wins in the Ronde van Vlaanderen (just barely)
3 wins in the Ronde van Vlaanderen (shared record holder) >> Tour de France
That's how I rank the races in general.
You obviously don't remember the 2006 & 2007 Tours then.Red Rick said:Let me put it like this.
The Ronde 2017 is a big what if
The 2014 Tour is the biggest what if I can remember