• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Critérium du Dauphine Stage 5: Parc des Oiseaux - Les Gets

Apr 9, 2011
3,034
2
0
PROFIL.gif


PROFILKMS.jpg


So the 1st questions of team Sky and Brad in the mountains tomorrow.

Is he 2009 form or just a great ITT who can climb a bit

more to the point what will Bavarianrider say about Tony´s climbing ability ?

Maybe he will talk up Degenkolb´s climbing ability stay tuned for more adventures of the Bavarianrider :p

on a more serious note will Tommy V be in the break ?
Will there be any other nation besides the French in the break, they need a win and coming from the break is the best chance.

will J-Ron or VDB2 or Gesink go hard and early for the win will this break Brad will Jani and Cadel go?

Will El Pistolero and Dekker_Tifosi each watch the same stage but see different things about their boys and discuss it over 45 posts?

Will Brad hold on ?

How many times will Carlton Kirby go on about Brad being the Favourite for the tour?

Stage 5 210 km.............. maybe we will have some answer maybe there will be more Question stay tuned.
 
May 27, 2010
5,376
0
0
bmc, astana, katusha, radioshack or sky to set a very hard pace on the climb. dont think wiggins will crack just yet. small group contesting the sprint with the likes of evans,vino,jrod. Or someone to sneek away on the last climb the likes of voeckler.
 
I really hope EBH doesn't try to do anything here, he has spent a little too much energy in Dauphine already. It's important now that he doesn't go to deep before TDF. However, Sky might be tempted to use him to control the pace in the last climb, but Uran could be able to do that alone.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
not nearly as hard as it looks.

Compare it with this profile from earlier in the season.
PROFILKMSVIGNETTE.gif

successive kilometres at between 9 and 13.5% for 5k

I would say that climb is harder than tommorows.

The result that day?

1st Gesink
2nd Boasson Hagen
3rd Devenyns
4th Vandevelde
5th Visconti
 
Feb 15, 2011
2,886
1
0
taiwan said:
PROFILKMS.jpg

Is it me, or do these numbers make no sense? Rodriguez or Voeckler FTW.

They don't make sense to me either. I have a 3,9-ish percent average over 10k. Not 4,8.

EDIT: maybe that 1 should be a 10 in the black part of the profile?
EDIT²: It should.
EDIT³: The use of color combined with the apparent gradients remains massively confusing :)
 
TeamSkyFans said:
not nearly as hard as it looks.

Compare it with this profile from earlier in the season.
PROFILKMSVIGNETTE.gif

successive kilometres at between 9 and 13.5% for 5k

I would say that climb is harder than tommorows.

The result that day?

1st Gesink
2nd Boasson Hagen
3rd Devenyns
4th Vandevelde
5th Visconti
You're arguing that wasn't a hard climb? Because it was. Gesink was just the only real climber who went for it (okay, maybe Vande Velde is a climber as well).

I get the feeling that on the profile of the climb to Les Gets, where it says 1% it should be 10%.
 
theyoungest said:
You're arguing that wasn't a hard climb? Because it was. Gesink was just the only real climber who went for it (okay, maybe Vande Velde is a climber as well).

I get the feeling that on the profile of the climb to Les Gets, where it says 1% it should be 10%.

why can take this for granted I think, but what about the red part with 1,4% ?!
 
Aug 18, 2009
4,993
1
0
boomcie said:
They don't make sense to me either. I have a 3,9-ish percent average over 10k. Not 4,8.

EDIT: maybe that 1 should be a 10 in the black part of the profile?
EDIT²: It should.

Actually if km 3-4 is 10%, km 4-5 is 3.3%, and the rest follow in order it makes sense.
 
Apr 9, 2011
3,034
2
0
So we have a 6.8 followed by a 10 % that will be where if there is damage will be done, then a 1.3 to go hard on. Looks a J-Rod finish to me.
 
Oct 16, 2009
3,864
0
0
theyoungest said:
You're arguing that wasn't a hard climb? Because it was. Gesink was just the only real climber who went for it (okay, maybe Vande Velde is a climber as well).
I think he's saying that Hagen has done well on climbs much harder than tomorrow's...
 
Jun 4, 2010
79
0
0
boomcie said:
EDIT³: The use of color combined with the apparent gradients remains massively confusing :)

Green: Family Friendly
Blue: Alcohol sections
Red: Anything goes
Black: Mustaches only
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
theyoungest said:
You're arguing that wasn't a hard climb? Because it was. Gesink was just the only real climber who went for it (okay, maybe Vande Velde is a climber as well).

I get the feeling that on the profile of the climb to Les Gets, where it says 1% it should be 10%.


no, where did i say that wasnt a hard climb???

Im saying tommorows climb doesnt look as tough as the green mountain stage that gesink won and boasson hagen finished second. So from that I am drawing the conclusion that riders of the likes of Boasson Hagen could finish inside the top ten (making allowances for february form/competition versus now)