You don't include MVP as one of the greatest of all times?Teddy vs Mathieu in Flandres, chapter #3. One of the greatest classics riders ever vs one of the greatest of all time. Besides the Tour, it's the most anticipated duel this year. Hopefully no crashes will spoil the party. Let the carnage begin!
You don't include MVP as one of the greatest of all times?
I would just like to know what it means to you one of the greatest of all times.One of the greatest classics riders of all time, that's exactly what I wrote.
I would just like to know what it means to you one of the greatest of all times.
I think the big question here is whether you consider De Vlaeminck and Kelly, unquestionably the two greatest non-climbers of all time, among your overall GOAT list. If Van der Poel can eclipse the former's total of 11 monuments + WCs, there is a very good argument for putting him up there, but at this point in his career his palmares is basically that of Boonen and nobody would put Boonen anywhere near their GOAT list.I would just like to know what it means to you one of the greatest of all times.
I think the big question here is whether you consider De Vlaeminck and Kelly, unquestionably the two greatest non-climbers of all time, among your overall GOAT list. If Van der Poel can eclipse the former's total of 11 monuments + WCs, there is a very good argument for putting him up there, but at this point in his career his palmares is basically that of Boonen and nobody would put Boonen anywhere near their GOAT list.
And what if he eclipse Kelly's total of 9? Is he near then?I think the big question here is whether you consider De Vlaeminck and Kelly, unquestionably the two greatest non-climbers of all time, among your overall GOAT list. If Van der Poel can eclipse the former's total of 11 monuments + WCs, there is a very good argument for putting him up there, but at this point in his career his palmares is basically that of Boonen and nobody would put Boonen anywhere near their GOAT list.
And what if he eclipse Kelly's total of 9? Is he near then?
If he passes De Vleminck's 11, then only Merckx has more...
And Boonen, no matter how you rate it, is among 10 best classics racers of all-time.
Same applies to Roger: 6 Tirreno's and 1 Switzerland. Even 4th in the Giro (and 22 stages).Kelly won a GT and zillion stage races. All-round champion.
If Wout is strong and is able to ride with the leaders for most or all of the race, how does that affect the balance of probabilities between the other favorites?Van Aert simply because it's the funniest outcome.
Mathieu would try using Wout to get an advantage, Pogi wouldn't do muchIf Wout is strong and is able to ride with the leaders for most or all of the race, how does that affect the balance of probabilities between the other favorites?
If he's able to follow all of the race so we get a sprint with 3, then he has the best odds to win.If Wout is strong and is able to ride with the leaders for most or all of the race, how does that affect the balance of probabilities between the other favorites?
The question is, who is the better Pedersen. Is it Mads or Casper?
If the three came together after the Paterberg, however unlikely at this point, it could benefit Pogacar, as the only chance of him beating VDP on a flat run-in would be a tactical use of other riders.If Wout is strong and is able to ride with the leaders for most or all of the race, how does that affect the balance of probabilities between the other favorites?
He hasn't shown that form in a very long time. That was a great win though.Why is my man Alberto Bettiol not an option? Pretty disrespectful towards the former winner of you ask me!