@pmcg76
You started your answer differentiating the meaning of canceled and fired. And previous answer by another user tried to rationale the same thing. That is basically if we get Kirby fired that for sure wouldn't be like all that other people on the internet. Canceling. Like nothing like that at all.
As for constructive criticism. That is always welcomed. But i feel we are currently past that. Lately the stance against Kirby is much more aggressive. To justify it by saying it's only constructive criticism. It's not. So hold your horses as Kirby is here to stay. And not much you can do about it. A decade will past and then some new name will come. And for sure we are going to love that person. Each year a little bit more.
@pmcg76
You started your answer differentiating the meaning of canceled and fired. And previous answer by another user tried to rationale the same thing. That is basically if we get Kirby fired that for sure wouldn't be like all that other people on the internet. Canceling. Like nothing like that at all.
As for constructive criticism. That is always welcomed. But i feel we are currently past that. Lately the stance against Kirby is much more aggressive. To justify it by saying it's only constructive criticism. It's not. So hold your horses as Kirby is here to stay. And not much you can do about it. A decade will past and then some new name will come. And for sure we are going to love that person. Each year a little bit more.
Once again, where did I say he should be fired which is what you claimed I said? Putting my TV on mute is not cancelling someone as the only person it impacts is myself. Complaining about a public figure on a public discussion on which their profession is the subject matter is not cancelling someone. There is criticism of riders, teams, managers, race organisers, governing bodies so why not commentators? Now if i was criticisng him directly on his twitter or haranguing ES about getting him fired, that could be viewed as trying to get him cancelled, but I am not.
The criticism of Kirby has been there his whole career, go back through the early pages of this thread from 11-12 years ago and there is posters talking about putting him on mute. He has been the one I have seen most frequently criticised, the Rob Hatch thing is relatively new as it only seems to have cropped up in recent years, I always liked him, but he has got more excitable in recent years. As I said Dan Lloyd Matt Stephens are better options and the criticism of them is far more muted.
As long as Kirby remains on commentary, there will be people wishing to vent so I guess you will have to live with that as well, or do you believe in trying to shut down posters who might have a different opinion than your own?