• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Eurosport commentary

Page 252 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I wasnt comfortable with the way Orla was questioning Fred Wright or Matej Mohoric about whether they were "alright", that seemed a deeply personal question that maybe post race when the cameras are all switched off, she can ask as a concerned friend, but as a broadcaster talking to millions of people watching you dont ask people how they are dealing with grief like that
Did she say "Are you ok?, as if channelling her inner Holly Willoughby? She could have her eye on the gap on that sofa, you know...

But, again, TBF, trying to get cyclists to cry on camera is totes in since MVdP started turning on the tears at the drop of a microphone two years ago. The Tour's emcee trying to get them to cry is applauded for his prowess with the onion spray.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sandisfan
The TV studio coverage for the grand tours has become increasingly dumbed down over the last few years. It's geared for viewing numbers and at trying to attract a new audience. However I find the whole thing much too forced and playing to the gallery but if you enjoy what passes as childish banter, constant backslapping and bigging everything up then it’s right up your street.
 
Jul 24, 2023
3
10
25
Visit site
The gcn/Eurosport English commentary for the tour de France femmes is shocking. Sounds like a horse race, just non-stop listing the (full) names of the riders and where they are. Too intense and high energy, save that for the big moments. The French commentary is buttery smooth by comparison.
 
The gcn/Eurosport English commentary for the tour de France femmes is shocking. Sounds like a horse race, just non-stop listing the (full) names of the riders and where they are. Too intense and high energy, save that for the big moments. The French commentary is buttery smooth by comparison.

I think its because they use people to do commentary who arent natural communicators/broadcasters, and so either dont bring or cant communicate any real insight into the race or knowledge of the countryside/area/route the race is taking through to add to the comms,

so it becomes almost commentary by rote simply calling out names of riders when you see them on picture, as the other modern affliction of tv commentators is not letting the pictures speak for themselves sometimes, but if they werent name checking all the time theyd have very little to say.

and i was wrong it seems weve got Blythe in the cube still
 
Last edited:
Jul 24, 2023
3
10
25
Visit site
I think its because they use people to do commentary who are natural communicators/broadcasters, and so either dont bring or cant communicate any real insight into the race or knowledge of the countryside/area/route the race is taking through to add to the comms,

so it becomes almost commentary by rote simply calling out names of riders when you see them on picture, as the other modern affliction of tv commentators is not letting the pictures speak for themselves sometimes, but if they werent name checking all the time theyd have very little to say.

and i was wrong it seems weve got Blythe in the cube still
The name checking is just pointless, if you follow the tour closely like my daughter she knows all the riders already. If like me you are just watching because you enjoy cycling then the names are irrelevant. The men's commentary is so much better. It's just frustrating that this is a sport that is just getting going for women and they are not investing in decent presenters.
 
theyre not helping themselves by not having comms on site in the velodrome for the awkward to read off the pictures alone races, especially as the director from the road race seems to have taken over with their same choice of barmy picture selection, and inevitably misses a chunk of the important bits, especially when they show slow mo replays during the actually races !?! even Jo Rowsell was getting annoyed with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Axel Hangleck
theyre not helping themselves by not having comms on site in the velodrome for the awkward to read off the pictures alone races, especially as the director from the road race seems to have taken over with their same choice of barmy picture selection, and inevitably misses a chunk of the important bits, especially when they show slow mo replays during the actually races !?! even Jo Rowsell was getting annoyed with that.

I really don't understand this policy anymore; I could during Covid, but it's nonsensical. Rob Hatch is in Mallorca, whilst the others are in London - completely missing all the atmosphere, etc
It was the same for the Downhill, Ric & Neil in a London studio for a home Worlds, when Fort Bill has one of the best atmospheres in MTB......I'm guessing the same will happen for the XC races.
Meanwhile, the BBC/world feed had people actually at the venues......
 
I really don't understand this policy anymore; I could during Covid, but it's nonsensical. Rob Hatch is in Mallorca, whilst the others are in London - completely missing all the atmosphere, etc
It was the same for the Downhill, Ric & Neil in a London studio for a home Worlds, when Fort Bill has one of the best atmospheres in MTB......I'm guessing the same will happen for the XC races.
Meanwhile, the BBC/world feed had people actually at the venues......
The last 3 years have shown that they can do good coverage without traveling to the races, and it also probably saves them a lot of money and hassle, just doing it from the studio.
Also, these broadcasters like to go on about climate change ect, I think not having entire broadcasting teams travel with all their equipment around France would probably be a good idea..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaptain Kool
The last 3 years have shown that they can do good coverage without traveling to the races, and it also probably saves them a lot of money and hassle, just doing it from the studio.
Also, these broadcasters like to go on about climate change ect, I think not having entire broadcasting teams travel with all their equipment around France would probably be a good idea..

There's a blend to be had for sure of onsite vs remote due to costs, and likely space considerations at venues with the worlds media in attendance.

But you will fundamentally struggle to commentate on things like a points race or madison in the velodrome remotely, because you can't see all the action unfolding or who the commissaires are signalling at,even more so when the TV director suddenly decides they need to get artistic or can't decide which bit of the race or crowd to focus on.

They were calling riders gaining laps when the bunch had just split in two, they missed actual riders going for laps, so they became "sneak" attacks, the picture changed to replays or showing a retiree from one race and we missed 2 or 3 laps so had no idea what was happening when the pictures returned to the race.

Consequently they called the race for bronze in the womens point race completely wrong, and so claimed Uchino had snuck into 3rd place, when in fact she was leading the sprint for the line. You'd have seen that move happen in the velodrome and knew Evans and Raaijmakers weren't in the right position to counter and were going to lose their medal chances half a lap before it happened.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
There's a blend to be had for sure of onsite vs remote due to costs, and likely space considerations at venues with the worlds media in attendance.

But you will fundamentally struggle to commentate on things like a points race or madison in the velodrome remotely, because you can't see all the action unfolding or who the commissaires are signalling at,even more so when the TV director suddenly decides they need to get artistic or can't decide which bit of the race or crowd to focus on.

They were calling riders gaining laps when the bunch had just split in two, they missed actual riders going for laps, so they became "sneak" attacks, the picture changed to replays or showing a retiree from one race and we missed 2 or 3 laps so had no idea what was happening when the pictures returned to the race.

Consequently they called the race for bronze in the womens point race completely wrong, and so claimed Uchino had snuck into 3rd place, when in fact she was leading the sprint for the line. You'd have seen that move happen in the velodrome and knew Evans and Raaijmakers weren't in the right position to counter and were going to lose their medal chances half a lap before it happened.
Your probably right, I was thinking more about the road racing coverage. The madison for example is hard enough to understand in general let alone on a TV in a studio!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
There's a blend to be had for sure of onsite vs remote due to costs, and likely space considerations at venues with the worlds media in attendance.

But you will fundamentally struggle to commentate on things like a points race or madison in the velodrome remotely, because you can't see all the action unfolding or who the commissaires are signalling at,even more so when the TV director suddenly decides they need to get artistic or can't decide which bit of the race or crowd to focus on.

They were calling riders gaining laps when the bunch had just split in two, they missed actual riders going for laps, so they became "sneak" attacks, the picture changed to replays or showing a retiree from one race and we missed 2 or 3 laps so had no idea what was happening when the pictures returned to the race.

Consequently they called the race for bronze in the womens point race completely wrong, and so claimed Uchino had snuck into 3rd place, when in fact she was leading the sprint for the line. You'd have seen that move happen in the velodrome and knew Evans and Raaijmakers weren't in the right position to counter and were going to lose their medal chances half a lap before it happened.
Was it CK doing the commentary?