Sammy could ride with Contador after 2012. That raises some serious $$$ issues. I think Saxo will need additional funding. What about the other riders like Nieve? Anton?
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Moose McKnuckles said:Sammy could ride with Contador after 2012. That raises some serious $$$ issues. I think Saxo will need additional funding. What about the other riders like Nieve? Anton?
The Hitch said:Euskaltel can survive on Anton and Nieve, and maybe on Landa in the future, but my heart would cry a little if Samuel Sanchez left.
craig1985 said:I'm confident that Euskaltel will still sponsor the team. TBH I don't think it will make difference if they do drop down to Pro Continental level, they are still good enough to get a WC for the Tour, Vuelta, Pays Basque etc., but don't have to races like Ghent Wevelgem, RVV, TDU, Beijing, the two races in Canada, which either don't suit them or put a big strain on their resources since they always have such a smaller squad.
Libertine Seguros said:Euskaltel will probably keep some money in, they're likely angling for somebody else to pick up the slack, somebody like Iberdrola, Naturgas Energia (they actually have connections to Fundación Euskadi too) or even Petronor (though I suspect they get all the exposure they need from Athletic) to help them out.
If they did break up, well, Movistar are Mikel Nieve's local team, since he's from Leitza.
Parrulo said:am i the only 1 that thinks that the only problem here is the WT itself? *hint: i am being rhetoricali know every1 thinks this way*
can we please go back to the good'ol days when the organizers had the teams they wanted and the teams that wanted to be there, in their own races?. . .
boardhanger said:I believe E.E has failed to adapt to the current UCI global calendar. Fact. They've showed no interest towards the early spring classics.....focused soley on GrandTours and hilly races in Spain. There is an attitude towards developing 'Basque' riders 'only' up untill recently....None of these 'ideals' have helped the teams cause. Cycling is now an international brand either grow with it, or stay stagnent and put your energies into a niche (advertising) market. This is what E.E has always done more or less.
ramjambunath said:To be fair, Euskaltel wouldn't be a great team without their Basque identity and definitely would lose lots of sponsorship value and essentially the team's identity if the drop their Basque-ness (similar to Athletic Bilbao).
boardhanger said:I believe E.E has failed to adapt to the current UCI global calendar. Fact. They've showed no interest towards the early spring classics.....focused soley on GrandTours and hilly races in Spain. There is an attitude towards developing 'Basque' riders 'only' up untill recently....None of these 'ideals' have helped the teams cause. Cycling is now an international brand either grow with it, or stay stagnent and put your energies into a niche (advertising) market. This is what E.E has always done more or less.
hfer07 said:I respectfully disagree-there is no indication of lacking world status because of the absence of riders "suitable" to be competitive in the classics-they're happy to concede the spot to any team interested in participating in those races - they're "forced" to do so by the Pat's "World Tour travesty"-but it does not mean they're not worthy of their current status. I actually support their effort & hope many teams will be created by local & national pride with their respective financial backing-as Sky is to English cycling, Movistar to Spain, OPL-QS is to Belgium & so on--
so basically the core of E-E current issues aren't about "international" diversity within the team- its all about the almighty money & how to continue the sponsorship during tough economical times where the backers are looking to save/cut expenses as much as possible......
boardhanger said:I believe E.E has failed to adapt to the current UCI global calendar. Fact. They've showed no interest towards the early spring classics.....focused soley on GrandTours and hilly races in Spain. There is an attitude towards developing 'Basque' riders 'only' up untill recently....None of these 'ideals' have helped the teams cause. Cycling is now an international brand either grow with it, or stay stagnent and put your energies into a niche (advertising) market. This is what E.E has always done more or less.
craig1985 said:There was an article in Pro Cycling Magazine a few months back and they interviewed a few people (journalists IIRC) and the collective view that there is no chance in hell that EE will ever fold as it will bevery bad PR for politicians. I'll try and find the article as that is all that I can remember.
Interestingly enough Juan Manuel Gárate (who is from Irun) was offered the chance to ride for EE and he refused and is actually opposed to the whole concept of hiring Basques-only.