Are we still keeping liquid sealents a secret from the road pro's?
Having a flat on a stretch of pave isn't bad luck, it's bad preparation.
Various flats affected the outcome of this weekend's Paris-Roubaix.
Most teams seemed to be running 24-25mm tires max (it's their party, so let them enjoy it), but with the current state of tire/tube sealent technology, unvoluntary flats really should be something of the past.
With each pro's bike at 6801g, surely there no big deal in shifting some of that weight towards tire sealents? Waiting for a wheel takes more time can wodka glass worth of sealent inside your tubes. Let along if you crash because of the flat.
Have we been riding for about a century on pneumatic tires only to still have flats?
In MTB racing, flats are getting pretty rare. And they've even quit using tubes. Just the lightest tires they can get from their sponsors, and some sealent does the trick.
Sure, I have flats once in a while too. But when I do, usually it's my own fault, I was too lazy to administer sealent, or it's been more than a year ago.
With a professional mechanic to my disposal, I'd always have the very best of sealent in my tires to complement the type of race at hand.
When you race to win, you first prep your bike to finish, right? In Roubaix, you're definately not going to lose in the last meters from having 40g of sealent inside your tubes. We'd love bike performance to have such an effect, but really, try adding 400g of lead to your rear rim, and imagine 1/10th of that effect pulling you back. But really you sould carry out that test only while removing an equal amount from your bike. Pro bikes should easily hit 6.8kg, frames and groups losing weight every other year.
For the racers among you, what do you prefer?
Finishing without flats, or using a flat as an excuse to skip a crit lap, preferably mid-race?
There are of course no free laps in the Classics...
Having a flat on a stretch of pave isn't bad luck, it's bad preparation.
Various flats affected the outcome of this weekend's Paris-Roubaix.
Most teams seemed to be running 24-25mm tires max (it's their party, so let them enjoy it), but with the current state of tire/tube sealent technology, unvoluntary flats really should be something of the past.
With each pro's bike at 6801g, surely there no big deal in shifting some of that weight towards tire sealents? Waiting for a wheel takes more time can wodka glass worth of sealent inside your tubes. Let along if you crash because of the flat.
Have we been riding for about a century on pneumatic tires only to still have flats?
In MTB racing, flats are getting pretty rare. And they've even quit using tubes. Just the lightest tires they can get from their sponsors, and some sealent does the trick.
Sure, I have flats once in a while too. But when I do, usually it's my own fault, I was too lazy to administer sealent, or it's been more than a year ago.
With a professional mechanic to my disposal, I'd always have the very best of sealent in my tires to complement the type of race at hand.
When you race to win, you first prep your bike to finish, right? In Roubaix, you're definately not going to lose in the last meters from having 40g of sealent inside your tubes. We'd love bike performance to have such an effect, but really, try adding 400g of lead to your rear rim, and imagine 1/10th of that effect pulling you back. But really you sould carry out that test only while removing an equal amount from your bike. Pro bikes should easily hit 6.8kg, frames and groups losing weight every other year.
For the racers among you, what do you prefer?
Finishing without flats, or using a flat as an excuse to skip a crit lap, preferably mid-race?
There are of course no free laps in the Classics...