Correct me if I'm wrong, but did Martin just win a 34.5km race in 35:15?
That's pushing 59kph.
Wow.
That's pushing 59kph.
Wow.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Ibanez said:Correct me if I'm wrong, but did Martin just win a 34.5km race in 35:15?
That's pushing 59kph.
Wow.
Yeah right, Ullrich was much more of a climber than Tony Martin, finishing 2nd in the Tour at age 22. (Martin is 3 years older already)ErmOkk said:or they quickly changed it to make their new potential german hero less suspicious . He trully is a new Ullrich in my eyes, with that big body slamming huge amounts of power on his pedals, but probably never good enough to follow the true climbers .
joy118118 said:It is 34.5km. As long as the U23 TT. The U23 TT champion Kittel even finished in 36:41.
Zoncolan said:A powerful following wind?
@markene2: much stronger TT-er than Ullrich? Check out Ullrich's palmares.
ingsve said:It seems that the track was run both ways with a turning point so that doesn't explain it and neither does the theory that it was downhill either. The most logical explanation is that they got the distance wrong.
screaming fist said:Actually the distance was 30.4 km - source is a participant.
markene2 said:I always thought that Martin would be the new Ullrich. He is much stronger at the TT. And can of course improve the climbing. Just look at Wiggins. I hope we see a new Ullrich. With the same respect that he had, and the way he treated the other riders. Only time will tell!