You know what could be fun?
If instead of having a big fancy presentation, they just casually publish the road book.
If instead of having a big fancy presentation, they just casually publish the road book.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Yeah, but they want the media buzz, a "big" presentation with big names attending and everything.You know what could be fun?
If instead of having a big fancy presentation, they just casually publish the road book.
Just email it to Devil's Elbow who publishes it on CN so the gang gets to whine about it before all the lame ass journalists get their "very difficult route" chat gpt articles out.You know what could be fun?
If instead of having a big fancy presentation, they just casually publish the road book.
Just email it to Devil's Elbow who publishes it on CN so the gang gets to whine about it before all the lame ass journalists get their "very difficult route" chat gpt articles out.
Or the previous rumour about finishing in Torbole. Monte Fae followed by Barbara and then a descent finish to Torbole. That is a very nice combo of climbs.My golly
That's just such a poor choice of MTF.
Just finish in Mori after Santa Barbara and put like Bondone before SB and you have fairly simple, but very solid mountain stage.
Don't think San Valentino from Avio is worse unless you specifically think it's hard section is too early or Santa Barbara will go super fast in this format.My hope was Brentonico. Almost.
At least it's not San Valentino from the main side.
You're probably right about that. But that is still better than them pulling some opposite horseshite, like a stage after the Bormio stage, starting in Bormio, directly into Stelvio and then a loooooong valley before a MTF somewhere in the Merano area.I do think the race benefits from a Mtf the day before the Bormio stage.
As the only "big" MTF, it still is as good as such one gets (if from Mori), more or less. I doubt they'll do Bondone, and I can imagine that they'll go past Torbole, so my hope is Valbona and Bordala first.I do think the race benefits from a Mtf the day before the Bormio stage.
Too many construction works for the Olympics in Cortina atm (last time I counted 20 cranes) and the whole mess that is the construction of the bobsleight track, riding though Cortina and finishing up there is a mess/a logistic nightmare. Apparently they did a recon and said that it was not possible/realistic.This might be slightly offtopic but what happened to the early rumors with Col Druscie?
That aside there are a lot of things I like about the rumoured route. First week is more or less perfect but the second week could be better. Third week is very, very promising compared to recent years.
At least Vegni is encouraging long range attacks
A few intersting things from this post
Stage 15: Descending the north side of Grappa which leads to a slighlty longer (although hillier) valley road before an easy final climb compared to the 2017 finish. Only benefit would be that the run in after the final climb looks a bit more interesting
Stage 16: A really difficult selection of climbs before san valentino probably making it the queen stage
Stage 17: A shorter easier stage before the normal edolo side of the mortirolo than previously suggested. This information comes from the same article as the news about the stage 16 finish although that article had no mention of which side of the mortirolo was going to be used
It's not looking quite as good as I had hoped from some rumours but it's not bad. I don't think we will know what side of the mortirolo they are using until they route presentation but based on everything else I think it will be the easier side as they like to have 1 medium mountain stage for breakaways in the 3rd week a bit like the stage to sappada this yearAt least Vegni is encouraging long range attacks
All in all, it is pretty good, but still there are some annoying choices. Longer valley after Grappa. San Valentino and not Bormio as a queen stage. That combo of climbs in Aosta on a rather short stage and the day before Finestre. That combo should rather been saved for a proper tappone on a later occasion adding for example and at least Saint Panthaleon at first.A few intersting things from this post
Stage 15: Descending the north side of Grappa which leads to a slighlty longer (although hillier) valley road before an easy final climb compared to the 2017 finish. Only benefit would be that the run in after the final climb looks a bit more interesting
Stage 16: A really difficult selection of climbs before san valentino probably making it the queen stage
Stage 17: A shorter easier stage before the normal edolo side of the mortirolo than previously suggested. This information comes from the same article as the news about the stage 16 finish although that article had no mention of which side of the mortirolo was going to be used
I worry that the Aosta stage is too similar to the Finestre stage and anyone who wants to try something will just wait until the finestre and an intresting combo of climbs will be wasted. Also San Valentino looks very similar to grand colombier which isn't usually the best climb for a summit finish, hopefully the difficult stage and santa barbara as a penultimate climb might make it more interesting. I would prefer san valentino from avio before a finish up La polsa which would probably be paid for by the same town so definitely doableAll in all, it is pretty good, but still there are some annoying choices. Longer valley after Grappa. San Valentino and not Bormio as a queen stage. That combo of climbs in Aosta on a rather short stage and the day before Finestre. That combo should rather been saved for a proper tappone on a later occasion adding for example and at least Saint Panthaleon at first.
now THIS is a friggin route. doesn't even include the strade bianche stage.
View: https://x.com/LasterketaBurua/status/1853159359578358252
tbh they are both getting there information from the same articles as far as I can tell and just taking their own creative liberties on the exact route, I'd probably have more confidence in La Flamme Rouge purely because they said that the Bormio stage would be 150km when everyone thought it was starting in Riva del Garda so they seem to have a little bit more insider infoNow I'm confused. The post just before yours (citing La Flamme Rouge) doesn't have Joux mid-stage and yours have it. I certainly hope it's as your post says. And I hope for a hard side of Mortirolo.
That won't happen with the current rumours.And I hope for a hard side of Mortirolo.
Or not at all. Beginning of may next year: " surprise!"You know what could be fun?
If instead of having a big fancy presentation, they just casually publish the road book.