• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Giro d'Italia Giro d'Italia 2025 Route: Speculation, Rumours and Announcements

Page 19 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I worry that the Aosta stage is too similar to the Finestre stage and anyone who wants to try something will just wait until the finestre and an intresting combo of climbs will be wasted. Also San Valentino looks very similar to grand colombier which isn't usually the best climb for a summit finish, hopefully the difficult stage and santa barbara as a penultimate climb might make it more interesting. I would prefer san valentino from avio before a finish up La polsa which would probably be paid for by the same town so definitely doable
The Santa Barbara-San Valentino combo is rather suitable for a something like 130-140 km mountain stage, and the Mortirolo - Bormio stage should rather have been a tappone. Otherwise the mountain stages seems fairly good. Add the sterrato stage, and we're in for one of the best GC routes the later years.
 
There are some nice looking stages, but I'm sorry but the Bormio stage is horrible given the possibilities in the area. It will be 3 times in a row they are using the easy side of the Mortirolo.
Agreed. If there are stages, climbs and areas I want to see in the Giro the coming years, that is on the top of the list. A proper tappone including at least Tonale, Gavia, Mortirolo from Mazzo and finish in Aprica. The other stages I would most like to see is a tappone with Fedaia used the "correct" way, that is as the penultimate climb. And not the least a proper murito stage in Marche, same type as the use sometimes in TA.
 
Last edited:
Since someone talked about Fedaia being passed the right way, is the Serrai closed forever to bike racing? Was it reconstructed as a walkway instead of the road that was there before?
I think most (all?) is fixed. But the width of the track is very slim.
It may work as a final climb in a hard stage but you can't have cars on this part of the climb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
I think most (all?) is fixed. But the width of the track is very slim.
It may work as a final climb in a hard stage but you can't have cars on this part of the climb.

But I believe it was reconstructed as in the image below. Don't think a peloton will go through there. Maybe a MTT, but I don't put my hopes high.

1722437694506_I_serrai_di_Sottoguda.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
I like a lot of it, the Grappa stage is gonna be wasted though with this final climb. I think the bormio stage could work with the steep eastern side but I think the number of stages where the final hard climb is far from the finish is a big risk. Like, I always wanted to see Tze Core into Joux but with another 17km to go after that this might just be a snoozefest. With the same final climb in the Grappa stage as 2017 plus maybe a finish on Col de Joux itself or something like that, it would look extremely great.
 
I think this Giro route is shaping up depending on racing. so that everybody loves the route if the racing is great and everybody hates it if the racing is bad.

Stage 19 is great but might be wasted because of Finestre being the next day. I like the pacing of the big MTF, Bormio stage and (I guess) flat stage 18 after that. Although I think that Bormio stage might be a waste by the way it looks without a hard Mortirolo.

Personally I think this is high risk-high reward kind of route and doesn't guarantee anything but it has the potential for a lot of great stages depending on GC situation throughout the race.
I like that risk so I praise the route.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JReed27
I think this Giro route is shaping up depending on racing. so that everybody loves the route if the racing is great and everybody hates it if the racing
I think people on here will agree that the 2012 Giro was one of, if not the worst edition of the race. But the route itself actually had some awesomely designed stages, which would be praised on this forum, but were passively raced.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
Afaik both climbs have very sketchy descents and Vegni isn't the guy to take that risk, without massive sponsors in the area
For the southern descent of Fauniera, is the problem mostly the state of the road near the top or the nature of the descent the two places where cars can only go one way? I can see why it might be complicated with cars, but other than that it looks fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
For the southern descent of Fauniera, is the problem mostly the state of the road near the top or the nature of the descent the two places where cars can only go one way? I can see why it might be complicated with cars, but other than that it looks fine.
yeah I think the width of the road is the main problem there. There are also quite a few dangerous sections that would need concrete safety measures, and since we are talking about a very long descent, I can imagine the costs would be high.
I'm sure that none of that would be a dealbreaker with the right offer, but as I said there are no sponsors in the area and I doubt the villages there can pay enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pastronef
I hope that when the deal with Rome is finished, Torino will pay for the Giro to finish there and that the penultimate stage will be in southern Piemonte (like in 2016, but with no visit to France). That should be a way to channel some funds in that direction, and then we might not have such a long drought afterwards again.

Do you think it was the city of Cuneo only who bid for a Fauniera stage a few years ago?
 
  • Like
Reactions: pastronef
I hope that when the deal with Rome is finished, Torino will pay for the Giro to finish there and that the penultimate stage will be in southern Piemonte (like in 2016, but with no visit to France). That should be a way to channel some funds in that direction, and then we might not have such a long drought afterwards again.

Do you think it was the city of Cuneo only who bid for a Fauniera stage a few years ago?
I think so, yes. Maybe the province, but pretty sure not the region.
 

Latest posts