Giro d'Italia Giro d'Italia 2026, Stage 2: Burgas (Бургас) - Veliko Tarnovo (Велико Търново), 221.0k

Sep 20, 2017
13,654
25,666
28,180
After the easy opener, play time ends here with a long, deceptively tricky mid-mountain stage.

Map and profile

ieWEakDDQVJWr3WEcdrP_140426-011845.jpg


f8wxyIBSBa47kTTS7PLN_140426-011714.jpg


The route

Zero transfer for the riders on this first overnight, which they would probably have appreciated more if it hadn’t meant that all 221 kilometres to the finish will be covered by bike. The first half of the stage is very easy, heading westward through the flatlands of the Upper Thracian Plain (Горнотракийска низина). 100 kilometres into the stage, the route reaches the intermediate sprint in Sliven (Сливен), the first real city reached when travelling inland from Burgas. It is situated at the foot of the Balkan mountains, which have lended their name to the entire peninsula. If you think that’s confusing, you’re not the only one: in Slavic languages, the range is nowadays usually referred to Стара планина (Stara Planina, literally ‘Old Mountain’).

In any case, the route turns north here to cross the mountain range. We are still in its lower eastern part here and the road used is the main one, so it doesn’t get too challenging, but even so these are the first climbs worthy of the name encountered in this race. The climbing is split into two, starting with the Byala pass (прохода Бяла), which is mostly at 5-6% but with a third quarter that is mostly false flat bringing the overall statistics down to 7.7k at 4.6%. After a short descent, it is followed by the Vratnik pass (Вратник), from its easier southern side, which is officially 9.1k at 4.4% but 4.1k at 5.9% excluding the categorised false flat at the start.

A sweeping descent takes us into the northern foothills of the Balkan Mountains, which form the backdrop of the remainder of the stage. The roads are mostly rolling for the next 60 kilometres, as far as the bonus sprint just outside of Lyaskovets (Лясковец). On the other side of this village, it’s time to start climbing up to the Lyaskovets monastery (Лясковски манастир). The official statistics (3.9k at 6.8%) don’t sound that intimidating, but when you realise that once again, RCS have included false flat at the start and end in those figures and that the main body of the climb is 2.5k at 8.9%, it becomes clear that this is a pretty stingy mid-mountain climb. There is an error in the profile below, as this is in fact a cat. 3 and not a cat. 4.

OQPsoFsmdHzqqEZ5GQDL_140426-012057.jpg


Finish

After the KOM, there are 10.6 kilometres left to race, and the riders start by heading downhill, partially via the highway, until 4.0k to go. The route then briefly follows the Yantra (Янтра) river, but the centre of town is above the valley and that’s where we’re headed. After a 250-metre cobbled section that ends at 2.1k from the line, the road starts to rise. I believe the official profile is a little bit off, as the steeper section definitely doesn’t last until the flamme rouge and the flamme rouge is also a bit lower than 194 metres – 850 metres at 5%, ending at 1.1k to go, is probably closer to the truth. There is another 250-metre cobbled section midway up this little kicker, but here the profile is also a bit off as the cobbled section is where the gradient temporarily levels off (they pass through a square here). The final kilometre is rolling.

eTHrkkxoETnBJ4uYtTui_140426-012032.jpg


jcqFjF1eTt9zm1S1F00J_140426-011946.jpg


Veliko Tarnovo is situated in a particularly narrow and winding part of the Yantra valley, with not one, but two easily defensible hills overlooking the river. As such, the site was settled as early as the 6th millennium BC. Both hills were possibly abandoned during the Roman period. The southern of the two, Tsarevets (Царевец), was certainly refortified by the Byzantines in the late 5th century, then destroyed and refounded as Tarnovgrad in the 6th century during the Slavic invasions. This name was eventually shortened to Tarnovo, with Veliko (meaning Great) being an epithet added during the communist era.

Over the next centuries, Tarnovo gradually developed into a town of decent size, but it only really rose to importance when it was a centre of the Bulgarian uprising in 1185. This uprising was successful, leading to independence from the Byzantine Empire and the establishment of the aforementioned Second Bulgarian Empire. Tarnovo became its capital, and rapidly developed into the political, economic and cultural centre of Bulgaria. During this period, the population peaked somewhere between 10000 and 20000 inhabitants. However, as discussed previously, this Empire was not to last, and when the Ottomans invaded, they inevitably came for Tarnovo. After a three-month siege in 1393, the city fell, and with that the back of the empire was broken. The old city was at least partially burned and destroyed. It is not clear to me whether the existing site was abandoned immediately, but certainly the city centre is located further west nowadays, with the two hills on which the capital had been located now archaeological sites surrounded by fortifications mostly reconstructed in the 20th century.

Tarnovo retained a special place in the Bulgarian psyche, being the location of multiple brief uprisings during the centuries of Ottoman rule. This helps explain why the Ottomans had little interest in the town, and it never recovered the importance it had had before the conquest. Even so, its cultural significance endured to an extent that it was selected as the temporary capital after the establishment of the modern Bulgarian state in 1878. The new constitution, which remained in place until the communist takeover, was ratified here the year after, upon which the capital was transferred to Sofia, which by now had far eclipsed Tarnovo. In 1908, the declaration of independence was officially proclaimed here, in the old home of the tsars, something that definitely wasn’t related to the reigning Prince Ferdinand now being elevated to tsardom.

Another effect of independence was that archaeological excavation of the medieval city commenced, albeit haltingly at first. Both excavation and the city in general were greatly disrupted by the 1913 earthquake, which damaged the majority of the city. Sources conflict on the number of deaths – I have seen figures between 20 and the low hundreds quoted. This came amidst rapid population growth – the town had stood at around 5000 inhabitants at the time of independence, a number that had more than doubled by the time of the earthquake and eventually stabilised at just below 70000 in the late communist period. Modern-day Veliko Tarnovo still retains a significant industrial presence, but has also increasingly developed into a tourist destination.

wPT03vp.jpeg

Veliko Tarnovo as seen from the old fortress (picture by Pudelek at Wikimedia Commons)

What to expect?

The stage reminds me quite a bit of the opening stage of the 2023 Tour. Just like that day, the most likely scenario is the GC riders coming out to play.
 
Last edited:
Feb 20, 2012
56,631
48,389
28,180
It's easier than Pike, but I very much agree with the comparison. That one also has this false flat downhill. It's definitely harder than San Vito 2 years ago, and slightly easier than Bologna in the TdF 2 years ago.

But with the climb being pretty narrow and the field not being great here, I can see Vingegaard just ripping it already and see what the damage is. He did try to win a similar stage in the Vuelta last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Apr 30, 2011
50,632
33,180
28,180
I'm a bit surprised by the bookmaker odds. I don't see the sprinters with any chance here. Looks like some GC action to me.
i think the odds are unsurprising and fairly well priced

there are no strong favourites and both morgado and strong could plausibly make a reduced group

if i were to place some fantasy dollars on a winner at current odds , id go with v$ne or sheffield as outsiders and some on strong as the favourite
 

Rou

Mar 20, 2024
2,662
3,396
10,180
Bookmakers follow betting action, and a lot of betting is people who don't analyse a parcour deeper than most media expecting a reduced bunch sprint.
A reduced bunch sprint is the most likely scenario and the bookies are doing the logical thing.
Corbin Strong is quite good a climber for a sprinter.
Based on Vingegaard's behaviour they are not expecting him to launch tomorrow.
I also don't expect him to move before Blockhaus.
 
May 6, 2021
15,354
27,715
23,180
Someone is getting caught out here, Christen the most likely to attack.

Gall only loses time when you don't expect it, I fully expect him to be up there with Vingegaard and the others on the punch looking top-shelf, to lure us all into thinking he's really worked on his positioning problems. The time-loss will come when you've forgotten it as a possibility.

Sky should set a false pace at the base on the front as to nurse a nervous week 1 Arensman up the climb. The 2020 Mont Aigoual strategy.

Pray for Derek Gee.
 
Feb 20, 2012
56,631
48,389
28,180
I think every close parallel to this sort of finish in GTs in recent years has either been a breakaway win, a GC battle, or both. And a breakaway should be extremely unlikely
 
Aug 29, 2009
8,969
8,694
23,180
I think every close parallel to this sort of finish in GTs in recent years has either been a breakaway win, a GC battle, or both.
The Nice stage of the covid Tour had quite a large group coming in together, but Quatre Chemins from that side is a bit easier, of course.

Still, I think guys like Strong, Silva, maybe Vendrame, may be able to more or less stay in contention, unless Vingegaard plans to set a statement.
 
May 9, 2010
11,178
2,724
28,180
i think the odds are unsurprising and fairly well priced

there are no strong favourites and both morgado and strong could plausibly make a reduced group

if i were to place some fantasy dollars on a winner at current odds , id go with v$ne or sheffield as outsiders and some on strong as the favourite
They're better adjusted now, but initially Magnier was priced at 15, Andresen at 10 etc., which I found odd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Sep 4, 2017
3,889
4,601
19,180
UAE should be interested in trying to light it up after the red bull kilometre. Christen and Morgado both have the punch to create separation. Ciccone and Pellizzari should be keen to mix it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Apr 30, 2011
50,632
33,180
28,180
They're better adjusted now, but initially Magnier was priced at 15, Andresen at 10 etc., which I found odd.
ah

when i checked , strong and morgado were weak favourites at 8 and i think vingegaard was in a large group of riders at 12 or 15
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Jun 30, 2022
8,589
12,254
17,180
It‘ll be rainy in Bulgaria tomorrow (or today in Bulgarian time). The weather should be at its worst in the second half but before the finish, but it‘s hard to predict.
 
Feb 20, 2012
56,631
48,389
28,180
The Nice stage of the covid Tour had quite a large group coming in together, but Quatre Chemins from that side is a bit easier, of course.

Still, I think guys like Strong, Silva, maybe Vendrame, may be able to more or less stay in contention, unless Vingegaard plans to set a statement.

I think that San Luca and cote de Pike in the TdF (and even Vuelta last year) are enough indicators that a hard 6 minute climb cresting at around 10 minutes from the finish is enough to spark GC action.

I feel like the only way it will be a reduced sprint if nobody seriously tries it and they just let a sprinters team set the pace, but I find that hard to imagine.
 
Last edited:
Mar 8, 2024
1,896
2,952
9,180
Me and Giulio down by the school yard ...Im going for him
Btw I noticed he is 31 ??? WTF ??? when did this happen
How do riders get old so quickly



Talking of which pity Pozzo is not in this race ...could have got himself a result in this field
 
Sep 2, 2011
2,467
671
13,680
Yeah Ciccone looks good for this.
Also another Giulio is ready.

The stage looks funny in the last part. Hope for some nice skirmish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Didinho