Giro d'Italia Giro d'Italia 2026, Stage 6: Paestum – Naples (Napoli), 142.0k

Sep 20, 2017
13,654
25,669
28,180
A sprint stage into Naples? Bet you didn’t see that one coming.

Map and profile

Fy9VjSwDjcSNZxc6SuqE_270426-101912.jpg


lTtfgmeY4piaEie6ITCI_270426-101916.jpg


Start

An overnight transfer has brought the riders back to the Tyrrhenian coast and into Campania. Unusually, the start is not in a currently inhabited place, but rather in an important archaeological site even by Italian standards: Paestum. Founded in the late 7th century BC as Poseidonia, this is one of the best-preserved colonies of Magna Graecia, the part of southern Italy colonised by the Ancient Greeks, and among the most archaeologically significant Ancient Greek temple complexes in general. It reached its apex in the 6th and 5th centuries BC, during which the three temples that earned it a spot on the UNESCO World Heritage List were constructed. Despite the name of the town, none of these temples were actually dedicated to Poseidon: two were part of a sanctuary to Hera, the third was devoted to Athena.

In the late 5th century BC, the entirety of the Greek world was weakened by the Peloponnesian War. It is during this time that the native Lucanians gained control of Poseidonia, which was then renamed Paistom (later Latinised to Paestum). The town loses some of its importance at this point, although as I will discuss momentarily, its decline was mainly precipitated by geological conditions. Paestum now became a culturally and ethnically mixed town, with the main surviving elements of this era being the painted tombs. Given the predisposition of the Lucanians and the Greeks alike towards the Romans, it should not come as a surprise that the town fought against Rome during the Pyrrhic War. After the Romans won this war, they incorporated Paestum in 273 BC. A significant part of the original town was razed at this point, thus in terms of quantity, most of the remains at Paestum are Roman.

While Paestum would be a staunch Roman ally from this point onward, its splendour was significantly reduced compared to the Greek period. This was partially because trade routes had already started to shift away from the town, but especially because the once fertile floodplain in which it was located slowly turned into a swamp. The archaeological evidence shows significant effort to raise the buildings and drain the site, but this only delayed the inevitable. As early as the beginning of the era, Strabo describes the town as having become ‘unhealthy’ due to the gradual swamping of the land (although it should be noted that other Roman writers of this era mention that it was notable for its roses at this time). Eventually, the rise of the water table forced the abandonment of more and more parts of the town, a process hastened by the onset of malarial conditions and the general decline of the Roman Empire. Paestum would be abandoned completely in (probably) the 9th century, possibly due to an Arab raid.

Because the area had become quite inhospitable due to the lack of drainage, it remained forgotten for close to a millennium before being rediscovered in the 18th century. Much of the three great temples had survived, but proper excavations did not start until the early 20th century and continue into the present day. These activities were made possible in part by the drainage of the marshy floodplain from the 1850s onwards. By the time of the Second World War, the area was quite accessible, and the Allies selected the nearby beaches as one of their landing sites. There seems to have been a mutual understanding with the Nazis not to bomb the temples, and thus they were used as a base by the US Army.

vdTp5as.jpeg


(picture by Bruno Rijsman at Flickr, reuploaded to Wikimedia Commons)

The route

The stage starts by heading up the mostly unexposed coastal road into the city of Salerno, the second-largest in Campania. This is an important city in its own right, having reached 50000 inhabitants in the 11th century and served as the de facto capital of the liberated part of Italy in 1944, but for tourists it is perhaps more notable as the gateway to the Amalfi Coast (Costiera amalfitana). Given that the shortest route between start and finish is less than 100 kilometres, you would think that there would be ample time to visit one of the most scenic places in the country, right? Think again. We are heading directly north, to allow for a loop through the (ahem) slightly less visually appealing suburbs of Naples later on in the stage. This does entail tackling the day’s sole KOM, to Cava de’ Tirreni. As you can see, it’s very easy.

cava-de-tirreni-salerno.png


The remaining 100 kilometres are entirely within the wider urban area of Naples. After a trek through its southeastern portion, we reach Nola, Emperor Augustus’ place of death. Here, midway through the stage, we join the route of the 2025 stage, and though we take an alternative road here and there, the vast majority of the second half of the stage entails the retreading of last year’s footsteps. Once again, we pass through the triangle of death (Triangolo della morte), home to Europe’s largest illegal waste dump courtesy of the mafia and a lack of effective government. The situation in terms of contamination and related disease and mortality is so severe that last year, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the Italian state has violated the rights of 2.9 million people living in or close to the triangle.

On a happier note, we also have an intermediate sprint in Brusciano, which hosted the bonus sprint last year. Said bonus sprint is another 25 kilometres down the road this time. After that, it’s the same route on highways around the airport towards Naples proper.

Finish

To quote from the roadbook (I can’t believe that they thought it was a good idea to write this):

the last 70 km are played out entirely on city roads, passing through several urban areas (where traffic obstacles and street fur niture will be the main impediments, as usual)

Apparently RCS decided that just repeating last year’s route (which was already rather chaotic courtesy of the rain) wasn’t hectic enough, and that they really needed a much more technical final kilometre. If you rewatch the finish of last year’s stage, you will see that there was a left-hander onto urban cobbles at 2.4k to go. That left-hander is still there, only this time it comes at 650 metres from the line. The 70-degree right-hander that comes 250 metres after this was also used last year, but this time, it is followed immediately by a 110-degree right-hander. The final 350 metres are straight, with the cobbles giving way to paving slabs at the last.

The 4% gradient on the profile below is slightly overstated (a 500-meter section with about 16 metres of elevation gain averages only 3.2% - going by Campania’s topographic maps, the 4% is accurate for the 200 metres after the final corner, which places the 300 metres before it at 2.5%). In any case, the final 150 metres are almost flat. The roads are wide, which combined with the uphill makes things less dramatic than they seem from the map, but it’s still more technical than average – and, lest we forget, these are roads that will turn into an ice rink if there’s any meaningful rain.

r8W0CXeBdVG18adPBgDs_140426-031212.jpg


q6f01gYxwBYoqOjykRc9_270426-094030.jpg


Naples is hosting the race for the fifth year in a row, and while I found new things to write about last year, I’m kind of out of ideas at this point. So enjoy another self-quote:

And this is where we talk about Napoli, again – it’s the fourth stage finish here in as many years. This is all the more remarkable because, after 41 appearances between the first-ever Giro in 1909 and 1969, there had only been four further visits in the 53 editions between then and the current run. But of course, there is far more to Neapolitan history than the Giro to say the least, starting with its original name from which that adjective is derived: Neapolis. As the name suggests, its foundation in the late 6th century BC was by the Greeks, and it soon rose to be the most important Greek colony on the Tyrrhenian Sea. The decision to ally with the Samnites in the Samnite Wars cost it its independence in 325 BC, but the Romans allowed it a great deal of autonomy for centuries and its Greek character endured well into the imperial period. By this time, it had already become the most important city in historically prosperous Campania following Capua’s ill-fated decision to ally with Carthage in the Second Punic War.

As elsewhere, the decline and fall of the Western Roman Empire led to difficult times (although Napoli never relinquished its status as one of the leading cities in Italy), with the city notably being successfully besieged three times (twice by the Byzantines, once by the Ostrogoths) during the Byzantine conquest of Italy in the mid-6th century. The Byzantines held onto Napoli as the Lombards erased most of their gains in the early 7th century, but as the early Arab conquests threatened the empire’s survival for most of the rest of the century they were forced to grant many of their Italian possessions autonomy (Venice is the other notable example). Napoli was therefore made a duchy in 661 and soon became de facto independent. This independence lasted until 1137, when the duchy was forced to submit to the Norman Kingdom of Sicily. Now I won’t bother you with all the subsequent ruling dynasties here, but I am obliged to point out that one of its rulers in this era was the fabled Frederick II, who founded its university – the oldest state university in the world – in 1224.

Upon the Sicilian Vespers towards the end of that century, the Kingdom of Sicily was split in two and Napoli became the seat of what has become known as the Kingdom of Napoli, comprising everything we think of today as mainland Southern Italy. The Kingdom fell to the Spanish in the 15th century, and after a brief French occupation was integrated into the Spanish Empire in 1504. From then, Napoli was governed by viceroys, and they would steer the city to its greatest heights. By the next turn of the century, Napoli was the second-largest city in Europe. However, the Spanish Empire had started to overextend itself in its endless wars, and subsequent heavy taxation burdened the city to the point of a ten-month insurrection in 1647, and after a plague epidemic in 1656 killed half the population, the golden age was definitively over.

By this time, both the Spanish Empire and its ruling Habsburg branch were in severe decline, and the Kingdom was under Austrian control for two decades upon the subsequent War of the Spanish Succession. Spain reclaimed the Kingdom in 1734, but now installed a cadet branch of its new Bourbon rulers and gradually both kingdoms grew apart. Napoli would never control more territory than it did after the fall of Napoleon and the subsequent reunification with Sicily, but that was the first and only aspect in which this final pre-unification era represented a peak. Otherwise, the Bourbons generally mismanaged the kingdom and presided over stagnation and widespread poverty. By the time of annexation by the nascent Italian state in 1861, Napoli was still the most populous city in Italy, but deeply underdeveloped and impoverished compared to the cities to its north. Sanitation was poor even by 19th-century standards, and attempts to remedy this after unification were stifled even then by the camorra (the Neapolitan mafia). It’s fair to say that things haven’t changed much since then. Napoli remains the leading city in Southern Italy in all aspects, but when you’ve spent centuries as one of the world’s leading cities in terms of architecture and yet the most notable additions to the urban fabric in more recent times are illegal constructions and waste dumping sites, things can and should be so much better. Despite all this, its inextricable ties to the opera, the baroque and Diego Maradona, as well as its status as the birthplace of pizza, mean its cultural influence endures.

eV5wumG.jpeg


The finish is on the Piazza del Plebiscito (picture by Sergey Ashmarin at Panoramio, reuploaded to Wikimedia Commons)

What to expect?

With the possible exception of Groenewegen, a slightly uphill finish suits all the big-name sprinters in the race just fine. The real question is who will still be in position after the double right-hander.
 
Mar 31, 2015
11,049
6,141
28,180
please tell me that it will be dry
Yellow warning for thunderstorms.

I think the finish is fine if dry and crazy if wet. I wonder if the organisers change it on the go if it does rain. You can't get to the square without the route they've taken and they're obviously doing it for the image of someone sprinting in front of the Royal Palace and Basilica, but maybe they move the finish back 1km?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Feb 20, 2012
56,636
48,395
28,180
Yellow warning for thunderstorms.

I think the finish is fine if dry and crazy if wet. I wonder if the organisers change it on the go if it does rain. You can't get to the square without the route they've taken and they're obviously doing it for the image of someone sprinting in front of the Royal Palace and Basilica, but maybe they move the finish back 1km?
Just neutralize GC times and let them sprint
 
Aug 29, 2009
8,973
8,707
23,180
let's hope more people will be interested in the break, seeing how close it was in Bulgaria already. Ghebreigzabhier must certainly feel today's effort, and most doms of the other favorites aren't any good anyway.
 
Apr 30, 2011
50,640
33,192
28,180
it sounded like unibet believes strongly in groenewegens chance tomorrow in the interview with niklas larsen
 
Apr 8, 2023
6,603
7,518
17,180
The organizers would be wanting Italians winning, so we have Ganna for the ITT and Big Jonny Milan for the sprints. The Trek train seems to have gone off the rails a bit so be interesting to see how they do. Twisty technical finales often favour a lone guy who can duck and dive and follow others, so Milan will probably have to wait for his win.
A 2 man Polti break again probably as it's seems destined for a bunch sprint.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sciatic
Apr 13, 2021
8,990
22,508
18,180
What a fantastic stage design by the way. Brilliant way to show off southern Italy to the world. I particularly like the safety considerations as well.
 
May 10, 2015
15,051
14,350
28,180
good that lotto started the race with several ill riders

I dont really understand the fuss about this honestly. In hindsight shouldve took them out after stage 2 maybe (but also not that weird to hope a rest day would make things better), but they literally did not have a choice starting with them cause you need to start with 8 and they already have their substitues starting (like Giddings instead of Slock who was ill, even Menten was a sub for De Buyst). Another sub, Kockelmann, was also ill. It's just bad luck. Giddings is also not ill but crashed hard on stage 2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: search
Aug 29, 2009
8,973
8,707
23,180
I dont really understand the fuss about this honestly. In hindsight shouldve took them out after stage 2 maybe (but also not that weird to hope a rest day would make things better), but they literally did not have a choice starting with them cause you need to start with 8 and they already have their substitues starting (like Giddings instead of Slock who was ill, even Menten was a sub for De Buyst). Another sub, Kockelmann, was also ill. It's just bad luck. Giddings is also not ill but crashed hard on stage 2.
at least de Lie's also developed symptomps only on Tuesday, so likely within the 72 windows already, when the team (including up to 2 subs) is already finalised.

Still not perfect in general to have potentially sick riders in the bunch, but it always happens anyway, and I would think Visma isn't really talking about a stomach bug. Haven't noticed anything in that regard at least. Vingegaard was wearing a mask on the flight, so more likely protecting against respiratory tract infections etc
 
Apr 30, 2011
50,640
33,192
28,180
I dont really understand the fuss about this honestly. In hindsight shouldve took them out after stage 2 maybe (but also not that weird to hope a rest day would make things better), but they literally did not have a choice starting with them cause you need to start with 8 and they already have their substitues starting (like Giddings instead of Slock who was ill, even Menten was a sub for De Buyst). Another sub, Kockelmann, was also ill. It's just bad luck. Giddings is also not ill but crashed hard on stage 2.
i dont know what illness it is nor whether or not they are likely to pass it on , but i assume lotto knows if thats the case
 
May 5, 2010
54,077
32,253
28,180
i dont know what illness it is nor whether or not they are likely to pass it on , but i assume lotto knows if thats the case

Apparently it was a result of ingesting cow *** during FAC.
Which, I don't think should be something they're going to pass on.
 
Jun 20, 2015
16,153
6,707
28,180
Think Lotto had 6 of their Giro squad in the Fame Ardeche classic 6 days before the start of the Giro. I don't think it was good planning to have so many of their Giro riders in this race. I have no problems with one or two riders.
 
Aug 29, 2009
8,973
8,707
23,180
Apparently it was a result of ingesting cow *** during FAC.
Which, I don't think should be something they're going to pass on.
not "apprently", no. This was just a completely baseless guess of a sports director.

It may be the case, but there is no indication for it.