The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
RedheadDane said:Me too.
Now I don't think many people would like to wear what has become "his" number and later on it will be a great way of remembering him.
So, does that mean that a team instead of being 101-109 will be 100-107 + 109. Putting in #100 instead of #108?
i believe this is just for the Giro d'Italia (which has a nine man team), correct me if i'm wrong?Libertine Seguros said:The Vuelta a Colombia often has 10-man teams and they run from 1-10. I think the organisers will trust the viewers to be able to tell a Leopard jersey from a Liquigas jersey when looking at who has a 110 prefix.
thirteen said:i believe this is just for the Giro d'Italia (which has a nine man team), correct me if i'm wrong?
beautiful gesture, imo.
my bad... you confused me by bringing up another race,.. past my bedtime, i guess. thank you for clarifying.Libertine Seguros said:It is just for the Giro, but because there was discussion of whether they'd shift numbers down (100-107, 109) or up (101-107, 109-110), I thought it worth pointing out that in one of very few races where the "0 or 10" number is a factor, they shift up.
thirteen said:as a way of memorial, i prefer 101-107 and then 109. it makes the absence of 108 that much more stark.
thirteen said:as a way of memorial, i prefer 101-107 and then 109. it makes the absence of 108 that much more stark.
you even saw it along the road today and, i imagine, will throughout the race.hrotha said:It's a nice gesture, but I don't think I'd have gone for it. I mean, in cycling rider numbers are just numbers, they don't hold any particular significance as they change from one race to the next. The fans however have made extensive use of the number 108 in their homage to Weylandts, so I guess it's justified.
i told you it's past my bedtimeTeamSkyFans said:The third option is just skipping 101-109 completely and save confusion
But that is only 8 numbers.
The point is, will 108 be replaced by 100, or 110 (or the entire sequence removed).
IT wouldnt really be fair to make one team only enter 8 riders each year.
TeamSkyFans said:The third option is just skipping 101-109 completely and save confusion
thirteen said:i told you it's past my bedtime
100-108 and 109.
(i'll correct my post and go to sleep)
hrotha said:It's a nice gesture, but I don't think I'd have gone for it. I mean, in cycling rider numbers are just numbers, they don't hold any particular significance as they change from one race to the next. The fans however have made extensive use of the number 108 in their homage to Weylandts, so I guess it's justified.
TeamSkyFans said:While im pleased to see the number retired in remembrance, I would like to see Stage 3 dedicated to him in the future, and if the number retiring is at the expense of any permanent tribute I think i would prefer the latter.
Dedicating stage 3 has a touch of remembrance about it, whereas retiring the number has a hint of "avoiding superstition" about it.
Pleased they have done it (although yet to see official confirmation), but would still hope that something is done regarding Stage 3 being a permanent memorial.
pmcg76 said:They have special awards named after riders for different things, isnt there an award for the first rider over the highest point of the Giro or at least there used to be, Cima Coppi I think it was.
I think many races have specials prizes like this so maybe stage 3 winners should receive a prize dedicated to the memory of Wouter.
ansimi said:I'm on board for the annual WW memorial stage 3. It would be a sprint stage and they could find some way to make it fun and respectful.
I agree. As I said in another thread, make stage 3 the memorial. After all, he won it. Call it the Wouter Weylandt "If you dont ride strong, I'll kick your ass" Memorial Stage.hrotha said:It's a nice gesture, but I don't think I'd have gone for it. I mean, in cycling rider numbers are just numbers, they don't hold any particular significance as they change from one race to the next.
hrotha said:It's a nice gesture, but I don't think I'd have gone for it. I mean, in cycling rider numbers are just numbers, they don't hold any particular significance as they change from one race to the next. The fans however have made extensive use of the number 108 in their homage to Weylandts, so I guess it's justified.
benpounder said:I agree. As I said in another thread, make stage 3 the memorial. After all, he won it. Call it the Wouter Weylandt "If you dont ride strong, I'll kick your ass" Memorial Stage.
orbis_25 said:It's true that in most circumstances a rider's race number bears no lasting importance (apart from possibly number 1). This is a different situation, though. I can't recall any time before when a rider's number has been adopted by the larger cycling family like Wouter's has. Number 108 has transcended the boundaries of the Giro and has become Wouter's number. We all know what 108 refers to, what it means, and while that may only last until the next race, this recognition still elevates Woulter's number to a higher importance than your general race number. Retiring it is quite fitting, really. In other sports, numbers will be retired after they become associated with a certain individual. While Wouter had very little time with 108, that does little to change the fact that cycling has made it his.