The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
RHRH19861986 said:Maybe we could use a classification for doping positives: we compare riders who tested positive to cases from the past. Relevant are age, status, substance, public image of the rider, and things like these.
I think Houanard is same category as Thomas Frei or Denis Galimzyanov.
Just read on CN´s article it comes to a time where Ag2R is searching new spot on WorldTour for 2013, so this makes this case clearly a political one. Two possible things, IMHO:
1. another contenting team for this spot is behind it, to get Ag2R from this possible place
2. UCI is behind it, to get a reason to give Ag2R´s spot to a team they prefer
They just ban the small one´s, to celebrate their "strong fight on doping". Houanard, the evil of cycling, so clear. What a piece of ****.
Might be Lavenu´s first real positive since a long time, Mancebo was Fuentes case, can´t remember the last real positive; now that Vino has left, no more protection for Lavenu, maybe??
Just speculating.
Leave Houanard alone, he´ll get his 50.000 a year, and just does his job in this rotten sport. Bad day for cycling, no doubt about that.
sniper said:Cycling is definitely cleaning up.
Except for a few rotten apples, such as the 133rd overall of the Vuelta 2011.
gthx_gthx_ said:Somehow i feel sorry for him. Looks as though he may have done it to survive in this sport. He hasn't stolen any win.
And there must be much much much worse than him in the peloton.
But those are the rules. They almost apply to everybody.
WildspokeJoe said:How is it a bad day?
He cheated and got caught.
Your theory that the UCI caused the positive is ridiculous.
For the French teams, their main concern is an invite to the Tour
Just like Eurocar, if AG2R went to continental status they would get a wild card invite too.
If he's guilty, it's a great day for cycling.
thehog said:Poor guy. Didn’t know how to shoot straight and missed the vain. Schoolboy error.
RHRH19861986 said:I suppose 95 per cent of about 500 World Tour riders either at least dope occasionally, or permanently. Every about three or six months, they pull someone out due to a positive test. That´s OK.
The evil thing about this is that this positive guy is regarded as black sheep, someone who destroys this sport. There are people like Armstrong or Valverde, and there are people like Houanard. It´s obvious that there´s a difference between those two. The big ones get protected, they lie and only get banned if public pressure gets too big. The small ones have no one behind them, they are easy victims, just alibis for the statistics.
That´s what I don´t like about this system.
Riis and Bruyneel have won everything with their riders for about 10 yrs. No one (except Fuji Li with Clen) was caught. I suppose this teams, among others, are protected by UCI, but this is only what I suppose, I might be wrong.
RHRH19861986 said:.............
Leave Houanard alone, he´ll get his 50.000 a year, and just does his job in this rotten sport. Bad day for cycling, no doubt about that.
RHRH19861986 said:Wouldn´t have been necessary... EPO also (and mostly) is used subcutane.![]()
TomasC said:...that is, if you don't mind testing positive.
BroDeal said:I think it is interesting that French doping seems to be more common than it used to be. I suspect that when the ASO decided it would not fight doping anymore, there was a similar shift in the attitudes of French riders. Having few results is bad for business and threatens the long term health of a country's cycling.
It is hard to explain Voeckler's 2011 Tour performance.
That's my take on it too. It's not just Europcar, there's been several doping busts in the amateur ranks, and I vaguely remember reading about weird physiological values in the French peloton going up recently.BroDeal said:I think it is interesting that French doping seems to be more common than it used to be. I suspect that when the ASO decided it would not fight doping anymore, there was a similar shift in the attitudes of French riders. Having few results is bad for business and threatens the long term health of a country's cycling.
It is hard to explain Voeckler's 2011 Tour performance.
sniper said:my hope might be idle, but I am hoping/expecting the french reaction to houanard's positive to be different from the spanish reaction to aldirto's positive.
sniper said:Cycling is definitely cleaning up.
Except for a few rotten apples, such as the 133rd overall of the Vuelta 2011.
The cryptic on that one around Christmas mi hombre amado.The Hitch said:Besides its far easier to defend someone when they test + for nandrolone than eop.