This a thread for expert race analyses, thanks everyone
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
It needed some more inviting serious mountain stages, I'd say.7/10.
Basically a better version of the Tour - both started brilliantly and then tailed off in the second half, but the Vuelta petered out to a far lesser extent because the battle for KOM, white and podium places remained alive until the final weekend. Add in the lack of sprint stages and Roglic never having the stranglehold Pogacar did and the difference is clear. That being said, it needed stronger action/tension for the actual GC win to move into the 8 or above, which I did think was going to happen halfway into the race.
Needs to be swapped with the Giro which is clearly the third rate GT now going by startlists and excitement.I give it a 6, for effort. It was quite fun the first week when every DS was trying to out-dumb one another, but ultimately, it became a Vuelta as basically all other Vueltas. It was the best Grand Tour of the season, but that ultimately speaks volumes of how boring the other two were, because this one wasn't that spectacular either.
Something drastically needs to change about this race. Push it back to October, make it 18 days. The 2020 edition should be the standard. Having these guys ride in 48 degrees isn't doing the racing much good. Give me more altitude (Hello, Pico Veleta. Hello, Collado de Sahun), give me less Unipublic Unipuerto stages. _______/ is boring, it will always be boring.
La Vuelta, in the grand scheme of grand tours, no matter how good or bad the racing is, will always be a big nothing. It is time we treat it as such, by devaluating it a little. It is a place where riders come to salvage their season, but nobody is devastated if they do not win it. There is a reason the only two type of riders that make la Vuelta their major goal are Spaniards of PCT level and neopros.
Nah, the Giro is fine as the first GT of the year. It just needs to be pushed further up the calendar by a few weeks, which would significantly drop the chances of queen stages getting cancelled due to weather and/or rider protests.Needs to be swapped with the Giro which is clearly the third rate GT now going by startlists and excitement.
No one targets it anymore except one rider a year. Truly the forgotten race of the three. Time for the Veulta and its legendary 4 time winner to be moved to its rightful place. Maybe Remco could win a Giro if they move it to SeptemberNah, the Giro is fine as the first GT of the year. It just needs to be pushed further up the calendar by a few weeks, which would significantly drop the chances of queen stages getting cancelled due to weather and/or rider protests.
At this point how can you say that WVA failing to fulfill his potential is anything but WVA being WVA?2 points for the O'Connor raid.
2 points for the Yates / Carapaz madness on stage 9.
1 point for Kung finally winning a GT ITT.
1 point for Roglic cementing his legacy.
1 point for UAE turning it around after Almeida went home.
1 point for Castrillo proving to be the new cagnaccio.
1 point for North Spain scenery.
1 point for WVA being WVA until...
- 2 points for WVA crashing out and ending his season.
- 1 point for the Cattaneo fiasco.
Overall a solid 7.
Riders targeting la Vuelta: Skjelmose.No one targets it anymore except one rider a year. Truly the forgotten race of the three. Time for the Veulta and its legendary 4 time winner to be moved to its rightful place. Maybe Remco could win a Giro if they move it to September