- Jun 28, 2009
- 568
- 0
- 0
What do you guys think and also what do you guys think is the right decision. I tend to believe they will let Lance keep the wins because it turns into a bigger sh*t storm than it already is if they don't
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Clemson Cycling said:What do you guys think and also what do you guys think is the right decision. I tend to believe they will let Lance keep the wins because it turns into a bigger sh*t storm than it already is if they don't
I think that will be the precedent for their reasoning for it at the end of the day as well. 7 wins with an asterisk. Also one would think the USA Cycling will cut ties with the USADA.sagard said:Riis might be a precedent. The races outside the statute of limitations he keeps, the later ones get handed down.
The NBA and WNBA do not use the USADA and they areCavalier said:They can't, if they do, they're not eligible for the Olympics.
Based on the reactions in the cycling community, it sounds like they are not ready to move on to a blank slate. At the end of the day there never will be a blank slate. This ruling is not going to change the way Team Sky or any other team approach things.Maxiton said:It's a sad thing to have the titles be vacant for seven straight years. Sad for Armstrong, sad for the race, sad for fans.
It's a sad testament to corruption and to a sad time when doping and payoffs at the highest levels got entirely out of hand. A sad testament to greed and stupidity - and there is plenty of both to go around.
But to leave the record as is, even with asterisks attached, would not be acceptable. Too much like a wink and a nod - we've seen too much of that. And to move the previous cheater out and his co-cheaters in, would essentially be sweeping dirt under the rug: just pretend nothing happened.
So the only option left is to leave the winner blank for all those years. And then make absolutely certain this never again has to be done.
Clemson Cycling said:What do you guys think and also what do you guys think is the right decision. I tend to believe they will let Lance keep the wins because it turns into a bigger sh*t storm than it already is if they don't
Maxiton said:It's a sad thing to have the titles be vacant for seven straight years. Sad for Armstrong, sad for the race, sad for fans.
MaxVO2 said:Nope, can't let that happen. That'll be step backwards. Riis got to keep his cos statute of limitations. And besides, this one's got way too much publicity.