Oversimplified question about cycling (and perhaps sports generally) for you all:
.
A. Is the age of innocence over for good, with "unfair" enhancements perpetually steps ahead of detection? And the aftermath of an always as much about the speculation of cheating as about the events "on the field".
OR
B. Will we ever get to a point where cycling is generally, more often then not, trusted as s porting endeavor?
(Of course we know there was never much innocence. But we thought there was, and enjoyed sport in ignorant bliss)
.
(EDIT: DAMMIT, I PUT THIS IN THE WRONG FORUM. SHOULD BE CLINIC. MODS, PLEASE MOVE IT. THANK YOU.)
.
A. Is the age of innocence over for good, with "unfair" enhancements perpetually steps ahead of detection? And the aftermath of an always as much about the speculation of cheating as about the events "on the field".
OR
B. Will we ever get to a point where cycling is generally, more often then not, trusted as s porting endeavor?
(Of course we know there was never much innocence. But we thought there was, and enjoyed sport in ignorant bliss)
.
(EDIT: DAMMIT, I PUT THIS IN THE WRONG FORUM. SHOULD BE CLINIC. MODS, PLEASE MOVE IT. THANK YOU.)