Lance v. Lemond - Lemond comes clean?

Jul 15, 2010
44
0
0
“We will have the opportunity to tell the truth to the authorities, and Greg LeMond will tell the truth about 1989 I hope,” - Lance
http://velonews.competitor.com/2010/07/news/greg-lemond-says-proble-could-end-lance-armstrong_129823

I love it! Lance fighting fire with fire! I have never really been a fan of Lance but the more LeMond talks, the more I want him to go away! Whatever Lances failings are - Greg is proving to be among the most bitter people I have ever heard. He has little room for anyone on the stage except himself... I reflect back to how he chased down his own teammate down, Jonathan Boyer in the 1982 Worlds. Thats seems to sum up what Greg is all about - Greg.
 
TahoeNL said:
“We will have the opportunity to tell the truth to the authorities, and Greg LeMond will tell the truth about 1989 I hope,” - Lance
http://velonews.competitor.com/2010/07/news/greg-lemond-says-proble-could-end-lance-armstrong_129823

I love it! Lance fighting fire with fire! I have never really been a fan of Lance but the more LeMond talks, the more I want him to go away! Whatever Lances failings are - Greg is proving to be among the most bitter people I have ever heard. He has little room for anyone on the stage except himself... I reflect back to how he chased down his own teammate down, Jonathan Boyer in the 1982 Worlds. Thats seems to sum up what Greg is all about - Greg.

Lance paid you to write that. :cool:
 
Jul 22, 2009
3,355
1
0
This is not going to end well. To the original poster: LeMond > Armstrong, around these parts. No matter what really happened to what and when.
 
scribe said:
This is not going to end well. To the original poster: LeMond > Armstrong, around these parts. No matter what really happened to what and when.

What happened? You have evidence Lemond doped? You'd be the first. Please, break the story!

The OP's agenda is clear. It is simply the next wave of the defense. What a sick joke Armstrong is.
 
Jul 22, 2009
3,355
1
0
red_flanders said:
What happened? You have evidence Lemond doped? You'd be the first. Please, break the story!

What happened? LeMond is the greatest American cyclist ever. (that felt good to get that off my chest)
 
red_flanders said:
What happened? You have evidence Lemond doped? You'd be the first. Please, break the story!

The OP's agenda is clear. It is simply the next wave of the defense. What a sick joke Armstrong is.

my sources told me Lequipe are preparing an article about Lemond and his doping tendencies





i made that up :(
 
Apr 19, 2009
278
0
0
TahoeNL said:
“We will have the opportunity to tell the truth to the authorities, and Greg LeMond will tell the truth about 1989 I hope,” - Lance
http://velonews.competitor.com/2010/07/news/greg-lemond-says-proble-could-end-lance-armstrong_129823

I love it! Lance fighting fire with fire! I have never really been a fan of Lance but the more LeMond talks, the more I want him to go away! Whatever Lances failings are - Greg is proving to be among the most bitter people I have ever heard. He has little room for anyone on the stage except himself... I reflect back to how he chased down his own teammate down, Jonathan Boyer in the 1982 Worlds. Thats seems to sum up what Greg is all about - Greg.

hahahahahahaha
best troll post ever.

:D
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
5
0
lemond was never doped for christ sake. epo didn't start until 1992. and that was exactly when lemond and the colombians started to seriously fade away in the peloton and nobody's like ugrumov, bobrik and riis started to become climbers.
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Ryo Hazuki said:
lemond was never doped for christ sake. epo didn't start until 1992. and that was exactly when lemond and the colombians started to seriously fade away in the peloton and nobody's like ugrumov, bobrik and riis started to become climbers.

Cause only people who use EPO are doping right?

I'm not saying Lemond doped, and I never will say it because there's simple no proof, but just because EPO wasn't used in his time doesn't mean he didn't take other doping products.
 
Ryo Hazuki said:
lemond was never doped for christ sake. epo didn't start until 1992. and that was exactly when lemond and the colombians started to seriously fade away in the peloton and nobody's like ugrumov, bobrik and riis started to become climbers.

epo yes,doping dates back to ??? (insert your thoughts),fausto coppi admited doping so its more like and old habit isnt it
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
5
0
El Pistolero said:
Cause only people who use EPO are doping right?

I'm not saying Lemond doped, and I never will say it because there's simple no proof, but just because EPO wasn't used in his time doesn't mean he didn't take other doping products.


who cares seriously the only doping that matters is epo. just look at the ridiculous change in the cycling landscape around 1992 when epo was introduced. this was before the 50% hematocrite rule so guys like riis rode with blood thicker than jelly.
 
Aug 16, 2009
181
0
0
El Pistolero said:
Cause only people who use EPO are doping right?

I'm not saying Lemond doped, and I never will say it because there's simple no proof, but just because EPO wasn't used in his time doesn't mean he didn't take other doping products.

+1.....umm blood transfusions are at the heart of the Flandis investigation too for example, and there are many others.
 
May 15, 2010
833
0
0
scribe said:
This is not going to end well. To the original poster: LeMond > Armstrong, around these parts. No matter what really happened to what and when.

Then tell us your perspective.
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
5
0
saganftw said:
epo yes,doping dates back to ??? (insert your thoughts),fausto coppi admited doping so its more like and old habit isnt it

yeah he used amphetamines. good luck racing harder from that.
 
Jul 18, 2010
254
0
0
El Pistolero said:
Cause only people who use EPO are doping right?

I'm not saying Lemond doped, and I never will say it because there's simple no proof, but just because EPO wasn't used in his time doesn't mean he didn't take other doping products.
But he inconveniently stopped using "them" as EPO use was rising, therefore ruining the end of his career?
Dumb, dumb Lemond :p
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
5
0
altark123 said:
+1.....umm blood transfusions are at the heart of the Flandis investigation too for example, and there are many others.

you do know that bloodtransfusions before even the 90s was like playing with your life right?? ever wondered why no cyclist ever or any sportsman was ever caught or admitted to doing that previous to the 2000s??

and besides if lemond was doped in the 80s then why didn't he go with the new doping epo in early 90s?? because he wanted to suck??
 
nia O'Malley said:
But he inconveniently stopped using "them" as EPO use was rising, therefore ruining the end of his career?
Dumb, dumb Lemond :p
To be fair, the perceived health risk of using EPO was high when it was first introduced. A rider could be willing to take some PEDs but shy away from EPO due to health concerns.
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Ryo Hazuki said:
you do know that bloodtransfusions before even the 90s was like playing with your life right?? ever wondered why no cyclist ever or any sportsman was ever caught or admitted to doing that previous to the 2000s??

and besides if lemond was doped in the 80s then why didn't he go with the new doping epo in early 90s?? because he wanted to suck??


Or he was simply too old to even compete on an equal basis even with EPO? And that hunting accident probably did some permanent harm as well, although that's just my assumption.

Look at the story of Tom Simpson. They doped with all kinds of stuff and it did help them ride better.
 
May 13, 2009
3,093
3
0
Oboy, this thread is a train wreck in the making.

Seriously guys, LA is simply loosing his cool. That's all.
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
5
0
hrotha said:
To be fair, the perceived health risk of using EPO was high when it was first introduced. A rider could be willing to take some PEDs but shy away from EPO due to health concerns.

and how many riders exactly died or got seriously injured around 1992 from these risks??