- May 27, 2012
- 6,458
- 0
- 0
I always had respect for the guy as a rider, but this statement:
Seems legit...
Seems legit...

The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
ChewbaccaD said:I always had respect for the guy as a rider, but this statement:
Seems legit...
![]()
ElChingon said:How easily some posters are deceived.
Just reading his employment history should be enough for anyone (in the clinic) or are some still believing in Santa Claus
That being said at least Jaja raced year round and was an animator at the races and didn't just show up to train for le Tour. As for Doping, well he was the Number One ranked rider for repeated years against whom?
Dot, Dot, Dot, Dot, Dot, Dot....![]()
Dr. Maserati said:Irony is, ONCE is a charity for the blind.
Looking at that "attempt" at a confession, riding for Phonak would have made three out of three...Scott SoCal said:Too bad JaJa never raced for Phonak. Coulda had two out of three.
gooner said:This French Senate hearing is a joke.
Jalabert's testimony is released publicly and he does it tip-toeing around the questions.
Yet Didier Deschamps does his one behind closed doors and won't say if he was questioned about France's World Cup win in 1998. Obviously they don't want this to come out and are protecting this from being exposed to the public.
Scott SoCal said:Too bad JaJa never raced for Phonak. Coulda had two out of three.
Roude Leiw said:Does anyone know if he could do jail time in France if he confesses? French laws are quite tough on this but i do not know if he may be pinched retro-actively? If that is the case, this would explain the tip toeing around the matter
gooner said:This French Senate hearing is a joke.
Jalabert's testimony is released publicly and he does it tip-toeing around the questions.
Yet Didier Deschamps does his one behind closed doors and won't say if he was questioned about France's World Cup win in 1998. Obviously they don't want this to come out and are protecting this from being exposed to the public.
Le breton said:Come on, you can't be serious. How could he be condemned under a law that didn't exist at the time?
He has said repeatedly that he does not want his image to be tarnished in the eyes of his children.
Le breton said:Too early to tell if the hearings are a joke. Or the joke was on Philippe Gaumont!
The only way they could get Deschamps to agree to testify was behind closed doors.
Zam_Olyas said:Aspiring pro-cyclist should have children as soon as they reach 18, then they will never dope.![]()
Le breton said:Come on, you can't be serious. How could he be condemned under a law that didn't exist at the time?
He has said repeatedly that he does not want his image to be tarnished in the eyes of his children.