• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Mc Quaid to retire before Contador's CAS hearing ?

May 26, 2009
460
0
0
WHEN will we see an end to this sorry series of delays that Shame the Sporting community !

Reached the point that i don't care if he is Innocent or Guilty BUT i do want to see ACTION when there is a case to answer !

Doubt that Alberto and i will meet before November but ANYONE deserves better treatment than this !

Mc Quaid and the UCIless gang need to look in the mirror and ask themselves IF ANYONE has any respect for them or anything they stand for since the announcement of "Contadorgate "!
 
Aug 4, 2009
1,056
1
0
Keep putting it off and it will run out of statute. Lawyers will argue now it has been too long since it happened and too much water under the bridge,
 
Feb 14, 2010
245
0
0
Ah darn!

I thought the OP was announcing McQ's retirement before this fall.
Soooo disappointed to find the different interpretation.
 
Mar 31, 2010
82
0
0
skippy said:
WHEN will we see an end to this sorry series of delays that Shame the Sporting community !

Reached the point that i don't care if he is Innocent or Guilty BUT i do want to see ACTION when there is a case to answer !

Doubt that Alberto and i will meet before November but ANYONE deserves better treatment than this !

Mc Quaid and the UCIless gang need to look in the mirror and ask themselves IF ANYONE has any respect for them or anything they stand for since the announcement of "Contadorgate "!

this is exactly what they have been trying to accomplish by dragging it out so long. Now no one cares whether he's guilty or innocent. They just want it to be over. You got played.
 
Mar 10, 2009
140
0
0
WADA did request this delay not Contador, however the way it's going, Contador himself will have retired before the hearing:mad:

I think that Contador has had bad advice on this, apart from in Spain, he seems to have lost a lot of public support and respect, certainly he seems to have been booed even more that Armstrong was.
 
Feb 14, 2010
2,202
0
0
...has allowed a request for a second exchange of written submissions between the parties as well as for a new procedural calendar. Such request was formulated by WADA with the unanimous agreement of the three other parties.

The second round of written submissions will allow the parties to complete their evidence and arguments relating to some specific scientific issues.

http://www.tas-cas.org/en/infogenerales.asp/4-3-4704-1092-4-1-1/5-0-1092-15-1-1/

I'm disappointed with the delay as well, but there's a lot going on behind the scenes. The day after the June scheduled hearing dates, it was announced that the five Mexican Gold Cup soccer players tested positive for Clenbuterol. WADA's handling of that could have an affect on the CAS decision. One of the players had a level 84 times as high as Contador's, and unlike Alberto, didn't have a test the previous day showing a zero amount.

There's also the non-case of four other players from the same test date. They're said to have had 200 picograms, 30, 30 and 30. WADA's largest Lab at UCLA was able to identify the amounts, but even though everyone claims there's no minimum threshold, the labs are allowed to totally ignore 200 picograms or less. Most labs can't even detect that small an amount, but UCLA decided in all four cases not to issue Adverse Analytical Findings. Mexico doesn't have a WADA lab, so maybe UCLA sees a lot of these in Mexican samples? Anyway, the cycling world was up in arms over Contador being allowed to compete based on 50 picograms. These four players were on the squad that won the Gold Cup.

WADA still claims to be studying info from the Mexican Federation before deciding what to do. The samples of the four who were never officially named went to Montreal and Cologne for whatever. But the clock on the thirty days to decide about an appeal has been running for a couple of weeks. If WADA does nothing, acknowledging that 200 picograms isn't even worth pursuing, and that nine soccer players eating contaminated meat is plausible, it has to help Contador's case. I followed the Mexican soccer thing in Google News every day, and I have no doubt that if WADA files an appeal, the soccer folks will ask to have it expedited. They were able to go from announced positive to Final Resolution in a month.

If I remember correctly, it was within a day or two after the Mexican announcement that a WADA member at an event in Italy said that they were going to suggest a minimum threshold for Clenbuterol, to be discussed at a July meeting. WADA put the kibosh on him and said the wouldn't be discussing Clenbuterol with the media again any time soon. But the meeting to decide about the 2012 list and regulations is in September.

So, there's a lot of WADA decisions about Clenbuterol going on before November. Since they're finally being forced to see the light on the Clenbuterol contamination issue, and the godawful law called Strict Liability, the "specific scientific issues" could be about something else. There was talk in June that they were adding in the plasticizer issue. If that's the case, and the test isn't even approved yet, there's obviously not a lot of studies available to use for defense.

Contador has some really solid lawyers.
 
Aug 9, 2010
448
0
0
ozerulz said:
this is exactly what they have been trying to accomplish by dragging it out so long. Now no one cares whether he's guilty or innocent. They just want it to be over. You got played.
Newsflash - what anyone here thinks is completely irrelevant and I doubt that anyone from Contador down gives a toss about playing you. Contador's case will be considered by CAS, not a scratch jury of internerds.
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
wiggins was just as unhappy with the delay as with contador's presence in the tour.

in no uncertain terms he said if not for contador, voeckler would have podiumed.
 
May 13, 2009
692
1
0
theswordsman said:
http://www.tas-cas.org/en/infogenerales.asp/4-3-4704-1092-4-1-1/5-0-1092-15-1-1/

I'm disappointed with the delay as well, but there's a lot going on behind the scenes. The day after the June scheduled hearing dates, it was announced that the five Mexican Gold Cup soccer players tested positive for Clenbuterol. WADA's handling of that could have an affect on the CAS decision. One of the players had a level 84 times as high as Contador's, and unlike Alberto, didn't have a test the previous day showing a zero amount.

There's also the non-case of four other players from the same test date. They're said to have had 200 picograms, 30, 30 and 30. WADA's largest Lab at UCLA was able to identify the amounts, but even though everyone claims there's no minimum threshold, the labs are allowed to totally ignore 200 picograms or less.

Contador has some really solid lawyers.

Very good solid post.

Ands I don't think Contador is making or losing any friends for that matter.

French boos?? those are the same guys that booed Armstrong, Pantani, Indurain, etc. Who cares about the French :p