The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
SeriousSam said:Haha those frenchies should train harder, start warming down and most importantly stop being so lazy. Sour grapes!
hrotha said:"Inhumane pace!" <- a gazillion riders manage to follow
Eh, does not compute.
pastronef said:hrotha said:"Inhumane pace!" <- a gazillion riders manage to follow
Eh, does not compute.
agree
what they say is they can't attack when that pace is so high
but yes, if it was inhuman, they would be left behind one by one. instead the group on Lacets, when Bardet attacked, was still quite big
adamfo said:Astana don't agree. On Sunday they sat on the front and upped the pace shelling people off the back.
kwikki said:Froome wasn't on his own when he attacked on the Ventoux. The top riders were with him. You'd expect top riders to be top riders, no?
By what means they got there is another question, but Froome, Porte and Mollema were on the same level on Ventoux. In fact, wasn't it Porte in front? He was when he hit the moto, otherwise we wouldn't have been treated to that shot of him looking like a foal chewing straw when he went down.
Fearless Greg Lemond said:True cycling fans love Team Time Trials, there was a time Garmin was very good at that discipline, Rolland should complain to his General Manager.
DFA123 said:It's no surprise that they can maintain a significantly higher power for 15 minutes each than other GC contenders can for an hour of climbing.
Point duly noted.Gaul 58 said:Fearless Greg Lemond said:True cycling fans love Team Time Trials, there was a time Garmin was very good at that discipline, Rolland should complain to his General Manager.
And some true cycling fans love echelons even more.
If you set a uniform salary cap then a top tier Italian based rider will pay roughly 40% taxes on his X-million euro contract it and in khazakstan it would be capped at 10% of his take home khazakstani tenge. A properly set up US based team could potentially get it down to 0%.Fergoose said:Leaders and domestiques are just titles. Should Porte have struggled in recent years to control an attack from the likes of Rolland just because he was a domestique? No.
Are the likes of Rolland superior riders to Poels, Henao and Landa? Nope.
Plus as a domestique you are backed by a teammate. If you burn up chasing down an attack you have backup. So you can expend way more energy in a short period of time than say Bardet could afford to when he attacked recently. If a leader on the attack blows up it'll ruin their tour.
Plus Poels seemed to be rested in the Pyrenees and now Landa and Henao seem to have been rested a little during the second week. In the last week the difference in energy levels between Sky's superdomestiques and rival team leaders is probably going to get even smaller.
Salary caps are the only answer to prevent the richest teams hoarding top talent and preventing us see the likes of Porte, Henao and Poels show what they could do on GC. A damn sight more than Rolland, that's for sure.
And Thomas last year was unreal. Altitude Boy, Poels and the Spaniards are good climbers. Poels might have improved slightly at Sky, but the others haven't changed much. Landa might even have regressed from his glowing Astana days.DFA123 said:The elephant in the room is still Froome. He's the guy who is putting these power outputs every day of every stage without any recovery. And, when his train is done, he is still able to attack or close gaps himself with apparent ease. When the climbing train are phoning in time trials and flat stages - Froome is finishing 2nd or going on the attack off the front. He'd win this race easily with or without the train.
Fergoose said:Salary caps are the only answer to prevent the richest teams hoarding top talent and preventing us see the likes of Porte, Henao and Poels show what they could do on GC. A damn sight more than Rolland, that's for sure.