• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Stepping into a little bit of a hornets nest here are some thoughts

OK, Nike have backed Justin

Paula has become upset about this, she has Nike backing

Paula may have had some suspicious blood values in the past, this does not in itself proove doping but does raise suspicions.

Nike have a track record of having backed some high profile guys that have in different ways fallen from grace, Oscar, Lance and Tiger spring to mind.

Nike may or may not use sweat shops
 
May 19, 2010
1,899
0
0
Nike probably found that having their brand associated with Armstrong, Tiger etc. etc. didn't harm it. So why not Gatlin too? Just do it, be a bad boy.

The logical thing for Radcliffe to do would be to say goodbye to Nike.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
2
0
i still wanna know why Paula was on RaceRadio's list. I am yet to hear a valid explanation
 
Re:

The frustrating thing with Nike is that they aren't just a malicious corporation, but that they really do make great products. They are the biggest funders of T&F, which is as a minor sport relies heavily on the such a few companies.

It's the invisible hand that slaps Nike on the wrist over their choices.

If Nike were a single person, I would say "Shame on you" but it is obviously something so much bigger: the collection of what people value in sports. It would fall on deaf ears to say "Shame on you all." The best I can do is try to make clean sports and good ethics more fulling to those people than whatever they're getting now.

Unfortunately, it's easier to do that in a pair of Nikes than Hoka One-Ones...
 
del1962 said:
Stepping into a little bit of a hornets nest here are some thoughts

OK, Nike have backed Justin. Paula has become upset about this, she has Nike backing. Paula may have had some suspicious blood values in the past, this does not in itself proove doping but does raise suspicions.

Nike have a track record of having backed some high profile guys that have in different ways fallen from grace, Oscar, Lance and Tiger spring to mind.Nike may or may not use sweat shops

IMO the problem is Phil Knight. He comes across as the proverbial good guy, but he seems oblivious to the rot in the kinds of sports Nike sponsors - track and field and cycling. He grew up in a pretty wealthy family, but that is not to deny his smarts and business acumen. He is the 43rd wealthiest man in the world with a net worth of about $23 billion. He has a reputation for philanthropy, but it is all to the University of Oregon athletics or Stanford Business School. He gave a $100 million to Oregon U's cancer program (kudos) and $100 million to Oregon athletics - both of which renamed their programs after Knight (ego satisfaction).

He gave $68 for a fancy athlete facility described as a 145,000 square-foot gridiron football facility. Knight's personal locker in the team's locker room displays the title "Uncle Phil", and other features include a gym with Brazilian hardwood floors, Apple iPhone chargers in each of the player's lockers, various auditoriums and meeting rooms, a games room for the players that includes flat-screen televisions and table football machines, and a cafeteria. All of the usual toys for the hard working and deprived athlete!!!!

But he just does not seem to be able to judge people's character very well i.e. Oscar (murder), Lance (serial cheat and perjury), Tiger (serial cheat), Michael Jordan (serial cheat), Joe Paterno (blind eye to sexual abuse), Marion Jones (perjury), and Michael Vick (dog fighting). And by not dropping these character-challenged athletes it appears Nike was condoning their behaviour. He specifically defended Tiger Woods and Lance Armstrong when the truth hit the fan. Cheating tends to be ignored by Nike and more particularly Knight.

Many refer to Knight's athletes as the "Shoebox of Shame" and not without good cause.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Phil Knight oblivious to doping....yeah sure. 43rd wealthiest man in the world thinks athletes play fair! What kind of stupid thinking is that!
 
Re:

Benotti69 said:
Phil Knight oblivious to doping....yeah sure. 43rd wealthiest man in the world thinks athletes play fair! What kind of stupid thinking is that!

I think you misunderstood what I am saying. I did not say he was not oblivious to doping. What I did say was he was a bad judge of character about people who were later shown to have doped and then he ignored it or specifically supported the athletes such as LA and TW. Please get what I said straight.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Re: Re:

RobbieCanuck said:
Benotti69 said:
Phil Knight oblivious to doping....yeah sure. 43rd wealthiest man in the world thinks athletes play fair! What kind of stupid thinking is that!

I think you misunderstood what I am saying. I did not say he was not oblivious to doping. What I did say was he was a bad judge of character about people who were later shown to have doped and then he ignored it or specifically supported the athletes such as LA and TW. Please get what I said straight.

He is the 43rd richest man in the world and you want me to think he has a bad judge of character. Can you name a top clean athlete for nike to sponsor that would make them billions? All publicity is good publicity for these guys.

Puhleeeasee.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
2
0
Re: Re:

RobbieCanuck said:
Benotti69 said:
Phil Knight oblivious to doping....yeah sure. 43rd wealthiest man in the world thinks athletes play fair! What kind of stupid thinking is that!

I think you misunderstood what I am saying. I did not say he was not oblivious to doping. What I did say was he was a bad judge of character about people who were later shown to have doped and then he ignored it or specifically supported the athletes such as LA and TW. Please get what I said straight.

double negatives, pleonasm, abiguity, or incoheren(cy)

nike DO sport. They know athletes win medals and get on the dias because of PEDs, because when the entire pool is on PEDs, you dont compete clean. And the winner most certainly, is gonna be the last person to compete clean.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
2
0
Re: Re:

More Strides than Rides said:
The frustrating thing with Nike is that they aren't just a malicious corporation, but that they really do make great products. They are the biggest funders of T&F, which is as a minor sport relies heavily on the such a few companies.

It's the invisible hand that slaps Nike on the wrist over their choices.

If Nike were a single person, I would say "Shame on you" but it is obviously something so much bigger: the collection of what people value in sports. It would fall on deaf ears to say "Shame on you all." The best I can do is try to make clean sports and good ethics more fulling to those people than whatever they're getting now.

Unfortunately, it's easier to do that in a pair of Nikes than Hoka One-Ones...

In about 1980, the surfing industry got behind a new International tournment competition, the ASP, and it was underwritten by companies like Quicksilver, Rip Curl, Billabong.

guess why? Marketing. it was pump-priming their economy and the pool of future consumers.

see: Olympics. Olympics in the pinnacle on Nike's marketing spend. It aint Lebron or Jordan or Woods or Kobe Bryant.

now for you to assert this is a philanthropic endeavour is frankly risible.
 
Re: Re:

Benotti69 said:
RobbieCanuck said:
Benotti69 said:
Phil Knight oblivious to doping....yeah sure. 43rd wealthiest man in the world thinks athletes play fair! What kind of stupid thinking is that!

I think you misunderstood what I am saying. I did not say he was not oblivious to doping. What I did say was he was a bad judge of character about people who were later shown to have doped and then he ignored it or specifically supported the athletes such as LA and TW. Please get what I said straight.

He is the 43rd richest man in the world and you want me to think he has a bad judge of character. Can you name a top clean athlete for nike to sponsor that would make them billions? All publicity is good publicity for these guys.

Puhleeeasee.

Benotti. Being the 43rd richest man in the World does not make one a good judge of character.

A top clean athlete would be Sara Hughes of Canada, Michael Phelps or Aaron Rogers, or Sydney Crosby, or Stephan Curry, or Lionel Messi or Milos Raconic, or Eugenie Bouchard - there are a slew of them out there.

You see I do not share your ingrained bias that every top athlete dopes. With respect, you are so jaundiced you tend to see dopers in every nook and cranny of sport. Have a little faith in mankind.

I don't deny that bad guys create publicity for Nike, but is it good publicity? That is up for debate. For example, Michael Jordan was a serial cheat on his wife. Unlike Tiger it did not get the publicity. Air Jordans long after
Jordan retired from basketball earned Nike something like $2.5 billion in sales in 2012. Why? Because they were cool shoes, they became a fad and kids could not get enough of them. They all wanted to "Be like Mike" In fact in some inner city "gang neighbourhoods" in the States some kids literally killed just to get a pair of Air Jordans.

Now you may say that proves your theory and it does. But what does that say about Knight?

I don't see that kind of publicity as showing Nike or Knight in a very favourable light. What really annoyed me was his defence of Armstrong when the evidence was so clear that for so long he was doping (Just like Verbruggen and McQuaid). Knight tried to protect Armstrong, because Armstrong was his cash cow rather than coming out and saying Armstrong is a cheat, serial liar and a fraudster and we don't want him representing Nike. THAT would have taken character by Knight.

Puhleeeasee what?
 
Re:

blackcat said:
Robbie is to the Canucks
what the cyclingnewsfora Empire Crew are to... well, the Empire.

Just another jaded cynic aren't you. All you can spout is rhetoric. You are unable to produce one iota of evidence as to why these athletes aren't clean.

If you are going to make the absurd insinuation about these athletes, and defaming them in the process, then show us the evidence. The world has long lived on the principle that he who alleges must prove. In other words put up or shut up. There is a word for people who say nasty things about other people behind their back, that they cannot prove and use the cloak of anonymity to do so - coward.
 
Nov 23, 2013
366
0
0
Since when is bad publicity really bad publicity? Its about one thing....making money selling stuff. Anyone who expects Phil Knight to give a rats a$$ about how that money gets made just isn't paying attention. How many billionaires do we believe became billiionaires through honesty and morality?
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Re: Re:

RobbieCanuck said:
Benotti69 said:
RobbieCanuck said:
Benotti69 said:
Phil Knight oblivious to doping....yeah sure. 43rd wealthiest man in the world thinks athletes play fair! What kind of stupid thinking is that!

I think you misunderstood what I am saying. I did not say he was not oblivious to doping. What I did say was he was a bad judge of character about people who were later shown to have doped and then he ignored it or specifically supported the athletes such as LA and TW. Please get what I said straight.

He is the 43rd richest man in the world and you want me to think he has a bad judge of character. Can you name a top clean athlete for nike to sponsor that would make them billions? All publicity is good publicity for these guys.

Puhleeeasee.

Benotti. Being the 43rd richest man in the World does not make one a good judge of character.

A top clean athlete would be Sara Hughes of Canada, Michael Phelps or Aaron Rogers, or Sydney Crosby, or Stephan Curry, or Lionel Messi or Milos Raconic, or Eugenie Bouchard - there are a slew of them out there.

You see I do not share your ingrained bias that every top athlete dopes. With respect, you are so jaundiced you tend to see dopers in every nook and cranny of sport. Have a little faith in mankind.

I don't deny that bad guys create publicity for Nike, but is it good publicity? That is up for debate. For example, Michael Jordan was a serial cheat on his wife. Unlike Tiger it did not get the publicity. Air Jordans long after
Jordan retired from basketball earned Nike something like $2.5 billion in sales in 2012. Why? Because they were cool shoes, they became a fad and kids could not get enough of them. They all wanted to "Be like Mike" In fact in some inner city "gang neighbourhoods" in the States some kids literally killed just to get a pair of Air Jordans.

Now you may say that proves your theory and it does. But what does that say about Knight?

I don't see that kind of publicity as showing Nike or Knight in a very favourable light. What really annoyed me was his defence of Armstrong when the evidence was so clear that for so long he was doping (Just like Verbruggen and McQuaid). Knight tried to protect Armstrong, because Armstrong was his cash cow rather than coming out and saying Armstrong is a cheat, serial liar and a fraudster and we don't want him representing Nike. THAT would have taken character by Knight.

Puhleeeasee what?

Being the 43rd richest man in the world means one does know how to judge character. Are they going to selling sporting gear or not? Good or bad athlete character doesn't come into it and i bet Knight doesn't give a rats pi$$ whether any of them are good, bad or indifferent people as long as it sells.

I bet Woods still makes Nike $$$$$$s.

Armstrong was a small fish in Nike's stable. They could easily afford to lose him. Losing a Jordan or Woods is different.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
2
0
Re:

Energy Starr said:
Since when is bad publicity really bad publicity? Its about one thing....making money selling stuff. Anyone who expects Phil Knight to give a rats a$$ about how that money gets made just isn't paying attention. How many billionaires do we believe became billiionaires through honesty and morality?

some of the tech guys lucked out in the economy that values their contribution. But this is more about survivor fallacy, and sampling, like Warren Buffet. There is always gonna be someone that is bang on and selects correctly, even with talent.but others had equivalent talent, and they were not the random in this survivor fallacy.

it is when you abnegate cache to those billionaires, both kinds. that is the error. lets not worry how much Phi Knight gave Oregon for their football program. or Stanford Business School.
 
Re: Re:

blackcat said:
More Strides than Rides said:
The frustrating thing with Nike is that they aren't just a malicious corporation, but that they really do make great products. They are the biggest funders of T&F, which is as a minor sport relies heavily on the such a few companies.

It's the invisible hand that slaps Nike on the wrist over their choices.

If Nike were a single person, I would say "Shame on you" but it is obviously something so much bigger: the collection of what people value in sports. It would fall on deaf ears to say "Shame on you all." The best I can do is try to make clean sports and good ethics more fulling to those people than whatever they're getting now.

Unfortunately, it's easier to do that in a pair of Nikes than Hoka One-Ones...

In about 1980, the surfing industry got behind a new International tournment competition, the ASP, and it was underwritten by companies like Quicksilver, Rip Curl, Billabong.

guess why? Marketing. it was pump-priming their economy and the pool of future consumers.

see: Olympics. Olympics in the pinnacle on Nike's marketing spend. It aint Lebron or Jordan or Woods or Kobe Bryant.

now for you to assert this is a philanthropic endeavour is frankly risible.

I was answering a question nobody asked, "What can be done about it?"

Yes. I agree. They are making tons from sports, knowing that they can be the most powerful entity. My frustration, expressed in the post, was that their presence is too big to do anything about.
 
Re: Re:

RobbieCanuck said:
Benotti. Being the 43rd richest man in the World does not make one a good judge of character.

A top clean athlete would be Sara Hughes of Canada, Michael Phelps or Aaron Rogers, or Sydney Crosby, or Stephan Curry, or Lionel Messi or Milos Raconic, or Eugenie Bouchard - there are a slew of them out there.

You see I do not share your ingrained bias that every top athlete dopes. With respect, you are so jaundiced you tend to see dopers in every nook and cranny of sport. Have a little faith in mankind.

I don't deny that bad guys create publicity for Nike, but is it good publicity? That is up for debate. For example, Michael Jordan was a serial cheat on his wife. Unlike Tiger it did not get the publicity. Air Jordans long after
Jordan retired from basketball earned Nike something like $2.5 billion in sales in 2012. Why? Because they were cool shoes, they became a fad and kids could not get enough of them. They all wanted to "Be like Mike" In fact in some inner city "gang neighbourhoods" in the States some kids literally killed just to get a pair of Air Jordans.

Now you may say that proves your theory and it does. But what does that say about Knight?

I don't see that kind of publicity as showing Nike or Knight in a very favourable light. What really annoyed me was his defence of Armstrong when the evidence was so clear that for so long he was doping (Just like Verbruggen and McQuaid). Knight tried to protect Armstrong, because Armstrong was his cash cow rather than coming out and saying Armstrong is a cheat, serial liar and a fraudster and we don't want him representing Nike. THAT would have taken character by Knight.

Puhleeeasee what?
Lionel Messi was filled with HGH to make him big enough to play the game and plays for a team which used to use Fuentes. His history has been picked apart a few times. He's not a good example to pick.
 
From http://www.letsrun.com/news/2015/08/police-report-nike-global-director-of-athletics-john-capriotti-threatened-to-kill-brooks-beasts-head-coach-and-former-nike-employee-danny-mackey-at-2015-usas/

By Jonathan Gault
August 13, 2015

Editor’s note: This article contains strong language.

Shortly after 10:35 a.m. on Sunday, June 28, Kara Goucher walked off the Hayward Field track. She had just finished 18th out of 20 runners in the women’s 5,000-meter final at the 2015 USATF Championships, but as she entered the media tent behind Hayward’s east grandstand, a swarm of reporters quickly enveloped the 36-year-old. Sporting a pink Oiselle kit with sunglasses pushed back to the top of her head, Goucher spoke passionately to the assembled scrum, discussing her role in the drug accusations against her former coach Alberto Salazar.

Five minutes and twenty seconds into her interview, a British journalist asked Goucher a question.

“Steve Magness said that Alberto has threatened him in the past. Has he or anyone else threatened you since this has all…”

“No,” Goucher replied. “But people have been threatened at this meet.”

***
The police report *Full Report Here

The police report
*Full Police Report Here

LetsRun.com can now confirm that Goucher was correct. Last Tuesday, LetsRun.com acquired a police report from the University of Oregon Police Department detailing an incident that took place on the first night of USAs. The report, supported by multiple eyewitnesses, explains that Nike global director of athletics John Capriotti aggressively confronted and threatened to kill Brooks Beasts head coach Danny Mackey on the night of Thursday, June 25.

What follows is an account of the night’s events according to the police report filed by Mackey. LetsRun.com spoke to Mackey and three other witnesses (we reached out to everyone named in the police report but not everyone responded), and all three supported Mackey’s version of events. Though not all witnesses could confirm the specifics of everything that was said between the two men, all agree that Capriotti initiated the confrontation and that he threatened Mackey, with one of the three specifically recalling that Capriotti threatened to kill Mackey.

Around 7 p.m. that night, shortly after Mackey’s Brooks athlete Dorian Ulrey finished his heat of the 1500 meters, Mackey escorted Ulrey to the medical tent at Hayward Field, located on the same set of turf athletic fields as the media tent in which Goucher would make her statement three days later. The two men sat down in the tent.

Unbeknownst to them, a hurricane was headed their way.

Will Leer, a Nike-sponsored athlete, had just finished his heat of the 1500 as well and was walking from the media tent back toward the athlete warmup area when “Cap[riotti] blew right by me charging across the infield,” Leer said. “I’m like, ‘That was weird, you don’t usually see those guys back here.’ And in quick succession, [fellow Nike employees] Llewellyn Starks and Ben Cesar were sort of hot on his heels trying to catch him… They all had serious look on their face. Serious and sort of troubled.”
Danny Mackey photo source: brooksrunning.com

Danny Mackey
photo source: brooksrunning.com

“I thought it was a bit strange because you rarely see [Capriotti] in that area,” said a second witness. “I can’t remember seeing him in that area before. I could kind of tell just by body language he was kind of on a mission.”

A fourth Nike employee, Robert Lotwis, trailed behind.

As Capriotti entered the medical tent, he made a beeline for Mackey and grabbed Mackey’s right arm, almost pulling the coach out of his chair.

“We gotta talk right now,” Capriotti told Mackey, according to the police report (Editor’s note: All quotes between Mackey and Capriotti below come from the police report filed by Mackey).

Mackey was talking to Ulrey and asked Capriotti to wait a minute.

Capriotti poked Mackey in the chest, hard, with two fingers. By this point, Starks had caught up to Capriotti and was standing directly in front of Mackey, staring at him wordlessly.

Mackey said Capriotti asked him to go outside. Mackey told him to relax.

Then, according to Mackey, Capriotti took a knee, and with his nose touching Mackey’s right ear, whispered, “You know what you fuckin’ did. I’m gonna fuckin’ kill you.”
Mackey Police 3

“I’m gonna fuckin’ kill you.”
*Full Police Report Here

Mackey got up but Starks did not budge, and the two men stood chest-to-chest.

Mackey was confused. “I don’t know what you are talking about John,” he said. “You are going to kill me? For what?”

Capriotti proceeded to berate Mackey.

To this point, the two men had not raised their voice to avoid creating a stir. Angered by Capriotti’s comments, Mackey spoke to him, louder than before.

“Outside?” Mackey said. “You are going to fight me for what? You need to relax. Leave.”

Capriotti took a step toward Mackey and poked him again, harder this time.

Mackey claims that Capriotti told him that Mackey brought up Capriotti’s name in a meeting. Mackey, again, told Capriotti that he didn’t know what he was talking about.

Capriotti then, according to the police report, “made some statements eluding (sic) to Mackey being involved in the doping scandal that was reported just before the championships began.” Mackey responded by yelling, and a crowd of over 20 people began to form around the two.

The two men shouted at each other for several minutes, as Capriotti continued to berate Mackey.

“It was just an overwhelmingly bad situation,” Leer said. “In the case of this interaction, there was someone who was definitely in the wrong and then there was someone who was being attacked.”

Eventually, Starks stepped between the two and told Capriotti, “We gotta get outta here.” The men exited the tent. Mackey has not spoken to them since.

Both Mackey and Capriotti were at the Flotrack Throwdown in Portland on August 9. Mackey said that he saw Capriotti at the meet from a distance and that Capriotti motioned for him to come over but that the two did not speak.

***

In his role as global director of athletics, Capriotti determines where Nike’s sponsorship dollars go in the world of track and field. He has final say on Nike’s sponsorship negotiations with athlete agents, USATF and professional track meets. The VIP area overlooking the 1500-meter start at Hayward Field, where many Nike executives and their guests sit during the Olympic Trials and USATF Championships, is named “Cap’s Corner” after Capriotti.
"Cap's Corner"

“Cap’s Corner”

“I would say it’s safe to say John Capriotti’s the most powerful figure in the sport,” said a witness to the incident at USAs.

To this day, Mackey does not understand why Capriotti confronted him.

“He brought up an agent’s name when he was yelling at me,” said Mackey. “I asked that agent, ‘Did I ever bring John’s name up or Nike?’ and he said no.”

At the time, both Nike and Brooks were recruiting the same female athlete, and several sources believe Mackey’s recruitment of the athlete was the source of Capriotti’s rage.

“I asked the athlete, who I assumed it was, and she doesn’t even know who John Capriotti is,” Mackey said. “I’m friends with Jerry Schumacher (coach of Nike’s Bowerman Track Club) and Mark Rowland (coach of Nike’s Oregon Track Club). When I go to Beijing, I’ll be hanging out with Jerry. I actually really like Nike and have a lot of respect for them. I would never negatively recruit anyway, it’s just not my style.”

Mackey did not want to name the agent or the athlete to avoid involving them in the story and possibly drawing the wrath of Capriotti and Nike.

Another possibility is that Capriotti may have been under stress following the doping allegations against Salazar and the NOP. Mackey worked in Nike’s sports research lab as a researcher from 2007 to 2010. When asked whether he came across data involving Salazar or the Nike Oregon Project, Mackey said “no comment.”

The three witnesses LetsRun.com spoke to said that the episode in the medical tent was far from an ordinary occurrence.

“I’ve been to a lot of meets. A lot…I probably do 15-20 jobs a year where I’m working with elite athletes in the sport and I’ve never seen anything like that,” said a witness. “To me, track and field feels like a bubble…If I reacted like that to someone I work with or a competitor, I would lose my job.”

Leer characterized the whole episode as unprofessional, particularly because of where the incident took place. Leer was upset and disappointed after failing to make the 1500 final and said there is no reason Capriotti should have confronted Mackey in the medical tent, in the presence of athletes who were either preparing for or just finishing up competition.

“If they had a grievance, I’d like to think it would be taken care of in a fashion other than good old-fashioned bully tactics and more professionally,” Leer said. “What struck me and left a sour taste in my mouth was seeing this take place in the athlete warmup area. There’s a thousand different ways in which you tell someone you don’t like what they’re doing. And this just seemed like the least professional and least productive manner of getting this done.”

Mackey did not run into Capriotti again at the championships and said that he didn’t have any difficulties for the rest of the meet, though he did fear for his safety based on Capriotti’s threats.

“It was a distraction,” Mackey said. “It’s just such a negative thing out of nowhere. It didn’t affect my effectiveness coaching, but me personally, yeah, [it affected me].”

***

Not all of Mackey’s athletes knew about the incident at USAs, and not wanting to turn it into a bigger distraction than it already was, Mackey waited until the championships were over to say anything to the police. On July 1, he spoke to UOPD officer John Loos and gave a brief description of events. Loos offered Mackey two options: he could file a police report to make note of the incident, or he could pursue criminal charges (which would also require filing a police report). Mackey initially declined to file any report, but after speaking to his employers at Brooks and some friends within the sport, Mackey concluded that because there had been so many witnesses and Brooks already knew about the incident, it made sense to file a police report. He stopped short of pursuing criminal charges, however, and elected to delay filing the report until July 18, the day after the Monaco Diamond League meet.

“Monaco is a Nike meet,” Mackey said. “I was going to be travelling by myself in Europe so I was a little bit worried about my safety.

“Once I made a decision, I was like, ‘Look I’m just gonna go for the lesser of it because I didn’t want to antagonize — even though I have every right to do that — I didn’t want to provoke Capriotti more. Because if I file a criminal charge, I have to go to Oregon, go through the court system. I don’t have the bandwidth to really handle that and be a one-man show with my athletes [that I coach].”

This is not the first time Capriotti has threatened someone within the sport, according to our sources. Every source interviewed for this story stated that they had either been threatened by Capriotti themselves or heard of others being threatened, but several of the sources chose to remain anonymous and not share specific anecdotes out of fear of what Capriotti could do to their careers.

“I’ve heard so many accounts of athletes, agents and meet directors getting treated like absolute dogshit,” said a source who works in the running industry with elite athletes. “I kind of wish all the agents would band together and say something…but because of the stranglehold he has on people’s paychecks, people won’t talk.”

“[Capriotti’s behavior at USAs] was not safe and it’s not smart,” said another source who works with athletes sponsored by shoe companies other than Nike. “He’s done this to a lot of people and everyone’s scared to say anything.”

“Someone who used to work at Nike kind of came up with the analogy that they operate like the mafia,” said a third source who has dealt with Nike in the past. “They will use any kind of pressure they can to get what they want. I’m not saying it’s anything illegal but using any kind of leverage they have.”

Indeed, Nike pours more money into the sport than anyone else. In Oregon alone, Nike sponsors three high-profile teams — the Nike Oregon Project, Bowerman Track Club and the Oregon Track Club. Nike also has a sponsorship deal that pays USATF approximately $20 million per year through 2040 for the right to produce the Team USA jersey.

“I would say that whoever is in [Capriotti’s office] is a very, very powerful figure in track and field because they control so many dollars in the sport,” said Nick Symmonds, who is sponsored by Brooks (and was sponsored by Nike for eight years). “Having that kind of control is powerful. I don’t know what [Capriotti] was referring to when he makes threats. I’m not sure why he does that or what background he has to be able to do that, but Nike’s a powerful corporation. Very powerful.”

“There’s a few others that work under Cap that behave similarly and it seems like that’s the corporate mentality. I don’t know that the bullying is unique to John Capriotti.”

In April 2006, Justin Gatlin failed a doping test at the Kansas Relays, testing positive for “testosterone or its precursors.” Gatlin’s coach at the time, Trevor Graham, claimed that Gatlin had been sabotaged by masseur Chris Whetstine. Two months later, at the USATF Outdoor Championships in Indianapolis, Whetstine went to the hospital with a broken nose, a dislocated thumb, a sprained ankle and a concussion. Whetstine said that Llewellyn Starks beat him up on the night of June 22, 2006, and sued both Starks and Nike for $3.9 million for the debilitating injuries he suffered that night. The two parties settled the lawsuit in 2009. Details of the settlement were not disclosed.

“I respect that they want to protect their athletes but [the Capriotti-Mackey incident] didn’t seem to me to be a case of protecting their athletes, this seemed to be a case of ego-driven chauvinism and proving manliness,” said a witness. “I still can’t really understand why someone would say things like this and act that way publicly. There were hundreds of people around.

“But in the world of track and field … who’s gonna levy any sanctions or get that person in trouble? Well there isn’t anyone bigger [than Nike] and they write all the checks for USATF. They can … do whatever they want. (T)he bigger issue that I see is … they’ve gained so much power. And at some point … [there] needs to be checks and balances — something that takes that power away and makes them a little more accountable for how they operate.”

LetsRun.com put in multiple interview requests for Capriotti, Starks, Cesar and Lotwis through Nike media, who declined to make any of them available for an interview.

police3.png
 
Feb 24, 2015
103
0
0
Re:

neineinei said:
Nike probably found that having their brand associated with Armstrong, Tiger etc. etc. didn't harm it. So why not Gatlin too? Just do it, be a bad boy.

The logical thing for Radcliffe to do would be to say goodbye to Nike.

Gatlin is great for Nike, a bit of a bad boy for the younger kids buying Nike, as well as showing the 30-something customers they can still kick the asses of the young guns :p
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
2
0
Re: Re:

Nellyspania said:
Gatlin is great for Nike, a bit of a bad boy for the younger kids buying Nike, as well as showing the 30-something customers they can still kick the asses of the young guns :p

the marketing wont work that way, if his Q rating depreciates and doping becomes a prominent and headline issue, he costs more sales than he makes. Atm, his doping profile is insignificant, and the corporate media protects the companies that buy their advertising. All Gatlin has to do is win. The bad boy thing is not on the radar and if it was, it would be costing sales more than making sales and Nike would drop him like Lance