It's every year the same but every year, I enjoy every bits of it. All he's said about present-day cycling are things I already thought before reading him.
I understand that gloryhunters can't appreciate such comments, but he speaks the truth, period.
In the book dedicated to him Roger De Vlaeminck Top60 Mens & Renner (2007) he spoke openly about it, "everything so predictable" "only Valverde and Bettini can do everything", his hatred towards "shared leadership (in a team), absence from the most important classics", "specialization towards GT", "traditional route changes", etc.
Semi-classics were far longer in his days. And the radios? Of course, he hates 'em. In his days, riders made up their own tactics. His manager never got involved in it.
For Paris-Roubaix 2006: "Where are the Vinokourov, Popovych and Ullrich? Why aren't they there?"
About Hoste leaving out Gent Wevelgem before Paris-Roubaix, he also a legendary comment in Humo
Globalization? Of course he has something to say. "The field was also strong in my time. There were 30 good Belgians + the French, Dutch, Italians, the Pettersson bros or Ole Ritter. Nah, he who wins a big race today earns a million; therefore they don't train hard for a whole season." (De Grootste Wielerkampioenen - Aarsbergen & Nijssen; Dutch book)
The non-European were of course there in his days. But the Belgian standard was too high for them. Why should you be so jealous?
Australians? Don Allan, Gary Clively, Clyde Sefton, Graeme Gilmore
Norwegians? Knut Knudsen was a tremendous tt'er !!
Americans? He competed against Jon Boyer in his prime.
Eastern Europeans? Of course he competed against 'em. Amateur Cyclocross Worlds 1968. He was 20 while they were in their prime.
He's a true champion. Just face the truth.