- May 28, 2012
- 2,779
- 0
- 0
You might see this and think it's a bad joke, but these two things are potential performance enhancers, and could in fact be dirt cheap and improved replacements of altitude training and EPO.(Source)
Subject 1: Carbon monoxide
Mostly known as a cause of death for residents of badly ventilated houses with low-quality central heating. However, in sub-lethal concentrations its effects are potentially a stronger equivalent of altitude training, as it makes your blood less effective in diffusing O2 into your bloodstream.
In short, if a pro would sleep in a carbon monoxide tent he'll improve his red blood cell count in no time, without the costs of altitude training. The closer the concentration of CO to the lethal level, the more effect it'll have.(NOTE: don't try this at home)
Subject 2: Smoke
Although serfla(who I haven't seen here in a long time) mentioned this theory before, I thought it needed some more time. It seems he was somewhat right after all. Smoking has about the same effects as subj. 1, except the way it works. Smoke partly inhibits the lung function, and as such it blocks the pathway for the gas exchange in your alveoli. It doesn't have the potential of carbon dioxide, but it's still a possibility.
Well, what do you think?
Subject 1: Carbon monoxide
Mostly known as a cause of death for residents of badly ventilated houses with low-quality central heating. However, in sub-lethal concentrations its effects are potentially a stronger equivalent of altitude training, as it makes your blood less effective in diffusing O2 into your bloodstream.
In short, if a pro would sleep in a carbon monoxide tent he'll improve his red blood cell count in no time, without the costs of altitude training. The closer the concentration of CO to the lethal level, the more effect it'll have.(NOTE: don't try this at home)
Subject 2: Smoke
Although serfla(who I haven't seen here in a long time) mentioned this theory before, I thought it needed some more time. It seems he was somewhat right after all. Smoking has about the same effects as subj. 1, except the way it works. Smoke partly inhibits the lung function, and as such it blocks the pathway for the gas exchange in your alveoli. It doesn't have the potential of carbon dioxide, but it's still a possibility.
Well, what do you think?