JMBeaushrimp said:
The Masters aren't going anywhere in the sport. They won't end up representing their country at the Olys or the Worlds (apart from the 'Geritol Games' that have popped up recently, including their own WCs). They aren't going to be signing with pro teams and continuing the legacy and history of the sport. They are only racing for themselves and. as the geriatric parasites they are, do nothing but suck resources out of competitive sport.
Every dollar that a Masters' team gets from a sponsor is a dollar that should go to young riders. Why? Because that is the group that will build the sport.
To have a bunch of past-their-prime has-beens duking it out to make themselves feel important is a bit of a sad spectacle. To be honest, I still do it. But any prize money or gifts I've won I give back to the organiser with the caveat that it goes to the top Junior. I really don't need a few euros or a pair of new tires, but I'm pretty sure that some racer kid would.
Rather than getting GL involved, how about this - rather than the yellow army of lancefans, I'd like to see a world-wide network of clubs that provide gear available to motivated kids who want to race. It's really only a rich-kid sport in north america, spread the wealth! H*ll, you could have everything painted yellow if you wanted, even put your dark prince's moniker on it if you'd like.
i'm not of masters age yet but i think everyone has a right to participate and has their own reasons for doing so. some of those reasons are quite admirable. there's really nothing wrong with middle age and older adults cultivating their fitness and testing themselves against one another. sometimes the payoff is little more than feeling a sense of accomplishment, actually i'd say that most of the time that's really all it is. characterizing them as "geriatric parasites" is WAAAAYYY off base. to go further, it's unfair to tax them for wanting to do so because
you've decided for everyone that junior racing and youth development for the sake of medal counts are of greatest importance. not to mention that cycling success at the world class level you mention pretty much means your pushing those young people into a dope-fueled rat race. you're sounding just as over-competitive as the personalities you're trying to avoid. here's how it should look...
i'd like to see more people on bikes, period. i'd gladly trade every last one of my countries' olympic/WC medals in the next twenty years if we could double the number of people (of all ages) who regularly ride bikes in my (or anyone else's) country. he11, forget about double, how about a 30% increase? yep, i'd take that.
i agree that bike racing should be more accessible to young people in financial need but it's also important for young people to have examples of adults participating in healthy, clean, fair, competition and to demonstrate an appropriate sportsmanlike attitude toward sporting successes, failures, and other athletes. it's a value judgment and a balancing act but i think EVERYONE has a right to compete and NO ONE has a right to make you to fund someone else's development. at the end of the day many people in a position to do so can, should, and will help. popularizing the sport also means there's plenty more yuppies casting off lightly used race wheels to poor young prodigies too.
lastly, i certainly don't think of anyone at any level of participation as a "parasite". they, like you, are all potential allies.