Anyone read Phil Gaimon's book Pro Cycling on $10 a Day?
Phil's always been pretty vocal about his views on doping/dopers and his book has some specific points he makes about guys like Lance and Mancebo. Phil's more subtle about guys like Freddy Rodriguez and defends the actions of Vaughters, Andreu, and Tom Danielson.
Phil writes about how he views Danielson and what Tom did to help get him a contract with Garmin. Also, Phil states that he'd be a hypocrite if he didn't explain why he views guys like Vaughters, Andreu, and Danielson differently than other dopers... It's obvious that Phil benefits from the relationships he's had with some past dopers. Some might indeed still call Phil a hypocrite for condemning some dopers but capitalizing on what other past dopers have been able to help him with.
Case in point, Tom Danielson's mentoring of Phil and his efforts to get Phil a contract with Garmin. Do you guys believe there's redemption for someone like Danielson for helping a vocal anti doping critic like Phil get to the world tour? Is Phil a pawn for Danielson? Are Phil's views on guys like Vaughters and Danielson too biased due to his riding for Garmin?
My own views are some what conflicted because I've always been pretty skeptical of any confessed doper who is still involved in the sport and because I'd really like to see Phil succeed at the world tour level.
Phil's always been pretty vocal about his views on doping/dopers and his book has some specific points he makes about guys like Lance and Mancebo. Phil's more subtle about guys like Freddy Rodriguez and defends the actions of Vaughters, Andreu, and Tom Danielson.
Phil writes about how he views Danielson and what Tom did to help get him a contract with Garmin. Also, Phil states that he'd be a hypocrite if he didn't explain why he views guys like Vaughters, Andreu, and Danielson differently than other dopers... It's obvious that Phil benefits from the relationships he's had with some past dopers. Some might indeed still call Phil a hypocrite for condemning some dopers but capitalizing on what other past dopers have been able to help him with.
Case in point, Tom Danielson's mentoring of Phil and his efforts to get Phil a contract with Garmin. Do you guys believe there's redemption for someone like Danielson for helping a vocal anti doping critic like Phil get to the world tour? Is Phil a pawn for Danielson? Are Phil's views on guys like Vaughters and Danielson too biased due to his riding for Garmin?
My own views are some what conflicted because I've always been pretty skeptical of any confessed doper who is still involved in the sport and because I'd really like to see Phil succeed at the world tour level.