Follow all the latest news and results from the Tour de Romandie 2022!
Giro d'Italia is fast approaching - Check out the Cycling News Giro d’Italia 2022 preview!
Let’s see if the new Spanish teams, neither of which have existed long enough to do anything of note, both win stages or manage anything beforehand like winning a stage of Suisse. My guess is neither will, certainly they wont both do so. I can understand the urge to help Spanish domestic cycling infrastructure start to improve again after the doldrums years, but let’s not pretend that this kind of decision is being made on quality grounds. If these teams weren’t based in a country with a GT neither of them would even make a shortlist of possible invites, certainly not before they’ve even raced. Particularly not the Basques. Then again Cofidis would no way get a second GT invite if they weren't buying it.MADRAZO said:As long as there are no serious difference in the level of the wild card candidates from Spain and other candidates like Aqua Blue Sport, Manzana, Nippo, CCC, Gasprom and so on, it makes sence that the Vuelta picks the spanish teams. Despite their stagewin last year Aqua Blue Sport is still a very mediocre team and both new spanish procontinental teams should be able to do as well as them.
??? Both teams have a well-established history. The Euskadi-Murias team is in its fourth year, Burgos is active since 2008. They are anything but new.Zinoviev Letter said:Let’s see if the new Spanish teams, neither of which have existed long enough to do anything of note, both win stages or manage anything beforehand like winning a stage of Suisse. My guess is neither will, certainly they wont both do so. I can understand the urge to help Spanish domestic cycling infrastructure start to improve again after the doldrums years, but let’s not pretend that this kind of decision is being made on quality grounds. If these teams weren’t based in a country with a GT neither of them would even make a shortlist of possible invites, certainly not before they’ve even raced. Particularly not the Basques. Then again Cofidis would no way get a second GT invite if they weren't buying it.MADRAZO said:As long as there are no serious difference in the level of the wild card candidates from Spain and other candidates like Aqua Blue Sport, Manzana, Nippo, CCC, Gasprom and so on, it makes sence that the Vuelta picks the spanish teams. Despite their stagewin last year Aqua Blue Sport is still a very mediocre team and both new spanish procontinental teams should be able to do as well as them.
Surely they are not picked because they are the strongest candidates, but they are picked because they are not much behind the other candidates. There are not that big a difference. Both the spanish teams (especially Burgos) may lack some depht but can put together a decent 8-man teams that are not much worse than what the other teams can do. If there were a significant gap in the quality they would likely not have gotten the wild cards I would guess, but now when its fairly even then ofcourse the spanish race picks them instead of other very mediocre teams like Aqua Blue Sport.Zinoviev Letter said:Let’s see if the new Spanish teams, neither of which have existed long enough to do anything of note, both win stages or manage anything beforehand like winning a stage of Suisse. My guess is neither will, certainly they wont both do so. I can understand the urge to help Spanish domestic cycling infrastructure start to improve again after the doldrums years, but let’s not pretend that this kind of decision is being made on quality grounds. If these teams weren’t based in a country with a GT neither of them would even make a shortlist of possible invites, certainly not before they’ve even raced. Particularly not the Basques. Then again Cofidis would no way get a second GT invite if they weren't buying it.MADRAZO said:As long as there are no serious difference in the level of the wild card candidates from Spain and other candidates like Aqua Blue Sport, Manzana, Nippo, CCC, Gasprom and so on, it makes sence that the Vuelta picks the spanish teams. Despite their stagewin last year Aqua Blue Sport is still a very mediocre team and both new spanish procontinental teams should be able to do as well as them.
Not as pro teams.Bye Bye Bicycle said:??? Both teams have a well-established history. The Euskadi-Murias team is in its fourth year, Burgos is active since 2008. They are anything but new.Zinoviev Letter said:Let’s see if the new Spanish teams, neither of which have existed long enough to do anything of note, both win stages or manage anything beforehand like winning a stage of Suisse. My guess is neither will, certainly they wont both do so. I can understand the urge to help Spanish domestic cycling infrastructure start to improve again after the doldrums years, but let’s not pretend that this kind of decision is being made on quality grounds. If these teams weren’t based in a country with a GT neither of them would even make a shortlist of possible invites, certainly not before they’ve even raced. Particularly not the Basques. Then again Cofidis would no way get a second GT invite if they weren't buying it.MADRAZO said:As long as there are no serious difference in the level of the wild card candidates from Spain and other candidates like Aqua Blue Sport, Manzana, Nippo, CCC, Gasprom and so on, it makes sence that the Vuelta picks the spanish teams. Despite their stagewin last year Aqua Blue Sport is still a very mediocre team and both new spanish procontinental teams should be able to do as well as them.
They aren’t the strongest candidates or the sixth strongest candidates or probably the tenth strongest candidates. They are new pro teams, full of Conti level riders stepping up. They are in because Unipublic wants to help Spanish domestic cycling recover from the carnage of the last few years. That’s a perfectly reasonable goal, certainly one that can be defended on its own terms. But don’t pretend to yourself or others that they are in for any other reason or that sporting considerations played any role in the choice. That’s just delusion.MADRAZO said:Surely they are not picked because they are the strongest candidates, but they are picked because they are not much behind the other candidates. There are not that big a difference. Both the spanish teams (especially Burgos) may lack some depht but can put together a decent 8-man teams that are not much worse than what the other teams can do. If there were a significant gap in the quality they would likely not have gotten the wild cards I would guess, but now when its fairly even then ofcourse the spanish race picks them instead of other very mediocre teams like Aqua Blue Sport.Zinoviev Letter said:Let’s see if the new Spanish teams, neither of which have existed long enough to do anything of note, both win stages or manage anything beforehand like winning a stage of Suisse. My guess is neither will, certainly they wont both do so. I can understand the urge to help Spanish domestic cycling infrastructure start to improve again after the doldrums years, but let’s not pretend that this kind of decision is being made on quality grounds. If these teams weren’t based in a country with a GT neither of them would even make a shortlist of possible invites, certainly not before they’ve even raced. Particularly not the Basques. Then again Cofidis would no way get a second GT invite if they weren't buying it.MADRAZO said:As long as there are no serious difference in the level of the wild card candidates from Spain and other candidates like Aqua Blue Sport, Manzana, Nippo, CCC, Gasprom and so on, it makes sence that the Vuelta picks the spanish teams. Despite their stagewin last year Aqua Blue Sport is still a very mediocre team and both new spanish procontinental teams should be able to do as well as them.
Looks like you don’t like the Basque Squad? Because Burgos is way below on CQRanking. And when I say below I mean waaay below, 23 places down. Murias is on the same level as Caja Rural.Zinoviev Letter said:Let’s see if the new Spanish teams, neither of which have existed long enough to do anything of note, both win stages or manage anything beforehand like winning a stage of Suisse. My guess is neither will, certainly they wont both do so. I can understand the urge to help Spanish domestic cycling infrastructure start to improve again after the doldrums years, but let’s not pretend that this kind of decision is being made on quality grounds. If these teams weren’t based in a country with a GT neither of them would even make a shortlist of possible invites, certainly not before they’ve even raced. Particularly not the Basques. Then again Cofidis would no way get a second GT invite if they weren't buying it.MADRAZO said:As long as there are no serious difference in the level of the wild card candidates from Spain and other candidates like Aqua Blue Sport, Manzana, Nippo, CCC, Gasprom and so on, it makes sence that the Vuelta picks the spanish teams. Despite their stagewin last year Aqua Blue Sport is still a very mediocre team and both new spanish procontinental teams should be able to do as well as them.
I do like them. But not enough to delude myself that quality had anything to do with their selection. They are a team of 20, 17 of whom were riding at Conti level - or in quite a few cases below that - in 2017, with none of the other three riding in the WT. If they were based outside of Spain they wouldn't make a shortlist of ten teams. Neither would Burgos. I've no problem with people arguing that they should get invites for the good of Spanish cycling, but people arguing that quality had something to do with it are just nuts.AupaPyama said:Looks like you don’t like the Basque Squad? Because Burgos is way below on CQRanking. And when I say below I mean waaay below, 23 places down. Murias is on the same level as Caja Rural.Zinoviev Letter said:Let’s see if the new Spanish teams, neither of which have existed long enough to do anything of note, both win stages or manage anything beforehand like winning a stage of Suisse. My guess is neither will, certainly they wont both do so. I can understand the urge to help Spanish domestic cycling infrastructure start to improve again after the doldrums years, but let’s not pretend that this kind of decision is being made on quality grounds. If these teams weren’t based in a country with a GT neither of them would even make a shortlist of possible invites, certainly not before they’ve even raced. Particularly not the Basques. Then again Cofidis would no way get a second GT invite if they weren't buying it.MADRAZO said:As long as there are no serious difference in the level of the wild card candidates from Spain and other candidates like Aqua Blue Sport, Manzana, Nippo, CCC, Gasprom and so on, it makes sence that the Vuelta picks the spanish teams. Despite their stagewin last year Aqua Blue Sport is still a very mediocre team and both new spanish procontinental teams should be able to do as well as them.
I also think you underestimate Aberasturi; with a lot of wins last year and previous WT experience. With Sanz and Prades its A Nice train. Also very nice to see Bravo again.
Also Loubet had 2 wins in 2017 and Samitier and Barcelo are very talenten. Well deserved wild card I think.
Three nationality picks with 0 (zero) pro wins between them this season and one pay to play pick.FilipeFD said:confirmed as expected
Caja Rural
Cofidis
Burgos - BH
Euskadi - Murias
http://cyclingpub.com/article/3726/La+Vuelta+favours+Spanish+teams+in+Wildcards+election