• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Pressure on UCI mounting

Apr 16, 2009
394
0
0
The pressure on the UCI is mounting, including from corporates. See the letter by the Skins Chairman published in today's Sydney Morning Herald.

An Open Letter to Mr. Pat McQuaid, President UCI from Jaimie Fuller, Chairman SKINS
Mr. President,

As the Chairman of SKINS, a global high performance sports brand originating in Australia, and a commercial partner to
Cycling Australia, Bike NZ, Rabobank Professional Cycling teams, Team Lotto Belisol and Team NetApp, plus the anti-doping
organisation, Bike Pure, I am writing this open letter to urge immediate action to prevent the irreparable implosion and
collapse of world cycling.

The Lance Armstrong scandal has exposed the sport to an embarrassing level of global disrepute. In short, world cycling is
a mess and as President of the UCI, you and those of your colleagues charged with its executive management, must act now
to restore confidence in world cycling or withdraw from office.

Currently, my company, SKINS remains a commercial partner to a discredited sport and has invested considerable amounts
of time and money to develop the sport of Cycling and it is the responsibility of the UCI to act appropriately in support of
SKINS and the other commercial stakeholders and sponsors around the world. As President, you must move immediately
to repair damage that, if left to suffer further inertia from the highest office, will be impossible to rectify.

As the Chairman of an active performance cycling industry participant, I demand that your response to USADA's comprehensive
report on Lance Armstrong's activities includes a transparent and credible reparation programme. You must act as your position
demands, or step aside. Tell the world what you intend to do or allow others with energy and fortitude to lead the sport through
its current crisis.

The USADA dossier includes supporting evidence from a long list of professional athletes, medics and support staff that is
so deeply damaging to the sport's reputation that the current inertia from those at its heart would be laughable if it was not
so potentially dangerous. Your reflection of a 21-day period to present a response to USADA's report is simply unacceptable.
Every day that Mr. Armstrong refuses to respond to the serious and comprehensive evidence USADA has presented, damages
the sport you govern and likely strengthens public perception of irreparable harm. In the last 48 hours, a series of sponsors
have ended their associations with Mr. Armstrong but the silence from him remains deafening. The evidence suggests that
denial from Mr. Armstrong would now appear illogical but turning away without any explanation shows a complete lack of
respect for a sport that has provided Mr. Armstrong with so much - however it was achieved. The UCI and you as President,
must use this process as a platform for redemption and change.

The UCI itself currently stands at the precipice of universal disgrace. It is an organisation that bizarrely accepted a generous
personal donation from Mr. Armstrong ten years ago to 'develop the sport' and you will be aware there is mounting speculation
as to the motivation for such benevolence. The phrase ‘conflict of interest’ immediately springs to mind. The UCI must therefore
clarify its independence beyond all doubt and persuade your erstwhile benefactor to confront these allegations publicly. This must
be done now to prevent further damage to the sport's withering credibility and lasting reputation.

I condemn Lance Armstrong for any drug-related misdemeanors, but equally, I praise the philanthropic brilliance he has shown
to make such an impact in the fight against cancer. Such work, of course, could not have been achieved without success as
a professional cyclist and I firmly believe that a public response by him on the evidence delivered in the USADA report is vital
if long-term redemption is to be achieved for all parties. Evasion and delay is not only unsatisfactory, it is morally reprehensible.

Allegations of UCI complicity are also gaining dangerous momentum with accusations not only that senior officials knew
what was going on but also failed to act in the wider interest. One recent media report provides evidence of a statement
given under oath, which alleges a payment of $500,000 into a bank account that belonged to your colleague, Mr. Hein
Verbruggen, during his period as president. The 2006 deposition claimed the payment was made to ensure that a positive
drugs test on Mr. Armstrong was covered up. Mr. Verbruggen, who is now of course Honorary President, has also been
ridiculed for apparently suggesting Lance "never used doping." I understand Mr. Verbruggen has since denied making the
comment, but a pattern of critical doubt is emerging about the overall credibility of the UCI and its most senior officers and
seriously questions the culture within the UCI. The UCI has a responsibility to pro-actively defend sport rather than overtly
or covertly defend Lance Armstrong. If those charged with upholding or repairing the dignity of the UCI cannot present credible
and transparent answers to critical questions with a clear conscience, there is only one option.

The British cyclist, David Millar confessed to his misdemeanors and is now an active anti-doping campaigner. The American
athlete Marion Jones continued to deny the use of performance enhancing drugs and ended up in jail. I implore you to either
ensure that Lance Armstrong confronts the allegations of being a 'serial drugs cheat' in order to start the process of restoring
confidence in the great sport of Cycling, or resign your position to allow others to steer the recovery path at this crucial time.

Yours sincerely,
Jaimie Fuller, Chairman
SKINS International Trading AG

The letter can be found from the link below.

http://www.skins.net/en-AU/index.aspx
 
Jul 8, 2009
187
0
0
I don't disagree that there is some pressure mounting, but how much dollars does SKINS put into ProTour and Continental teams and races? I'm asking because I don't know the answer, and that's what would determine if this really constitutes additional pressure on the UCI.
 
Oct 8, 2012
237
1
0
You want pressure? Check this out. The premiere sports TV channel in the world is calling out the UCI's credibility.

ESPN video about possible collusion between drug testers USPS cyclists. Fast forward to about the 2 min mark. The UCI's entire credibility is at stake.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OLXzOO473Z8
 
Oct 8, 2012
237
1
0
purcell said:
I take it you live in the US?


Oops. Sorry. I was a bit naive in forgetting that many other forum users here aren't in the US like me. ESPN is the biggest sports channel in all of North America, including US, Canada, and Mexico. If I am not mistaken Eurosport is the biggest in Europe, and SBS the biggest in Australia.

Hopefully, that video will load for you guys outside of N. America. It is quite good and worth a couple minutes of watching.
 
Every day that Mr. Armstrong refuses to respond to the serious and comprehensive evidence USADA has presented, damages the sport you govern and likely strengthens public perception of irreparable harm. In the last 48 hours, a series of sponsors have ended their associations with Mr. Armstrong but the silence from him remains deafening. The evidence suggests that denial from Mr. Armstrong would now appear illogical but turning away without any explanation shows a complete lack of respect for a sport that has provided Mr. Armstrong with so much - however it was achieved. The UCI and you as President, must use this process as a platform for redemption and change.


+1
 
Oct 8, 2012
237
1
0
70kmph said:
Every day that Mr. Armstrong refuses to respond to the serious and comprehensive evidence USADA has presented, damages the sport you govern and likely strengthens public perception of irreparable harm. In the last 48 hours, a series of sponsors have ended their associations with Mr. Armstrong but the silence from him remains deafening. The evidence suggests that denial from Mr. Armstrong would now appear illogical but turning away without any explanation shows a complete lack of respect for a sport that has provided Mr. Armstrong with so much - however it was achieved. The UCI and you as President, must use this process as a platform for redemption and change.


+1



Armstrong is beyond redemption. Even Nike knew that or they would've stayed with him.
 
Aug 27, 2012
1,436
0
0
And here a really great article in a leading dutch newspaper "Volkskrant". By a journalism student for C***st sake. Good on her. Press google translate, you'll get the drift.

http://www.volkskrant.nl/vk/nl/3184...ldig-aan-dopingschandaal-rond-Armstrong.dhtml

Covers the Sysmex payment, the 2001 postive cover up, Kimmage case, lack of trust in UCI, WADA, IOC, Pound statement, Jacksche and Landis whistleblowing, and IOC & WADA ethical codes that UCI has signed up to.

Pressure mounting all right...
 
Tinman said:
And here a really great article in a leading dutch newspaper "Volkskrant". By a journalism student for C***st sake. Good on her. Press google translate, you'll get the drift.

Covers the Sysmex payment, the 2001 postive cover up, Kimmage case, lack of trust in UCI, WADA, IOC, Pound statement, Jacksche and Landis whistleblowing, and IOC & WADA ethical codes that UCI has signed up to.

Pressure mounting all right...

What pressure? Pressure that they might need to change the upholstery on the board room chairs. Pressure that they might need some new art work in the hallways.

The UCI don't face pressure. From whom? From where?
 
biker jk said:
The pressure on the UCI is mounting, including from corporates. See the letter by the Skins Chairman published in today's Sydney Morning Herald.

An Open Letter to Mr. Pat McQuaid, President UCI from Jaimie Fuller, Chairman SKINS
Mr. President,

... the current inertia from those at its heart would be laughable if it was not so potentially dangerous.

...


Yours sincerely,
Jaimie Fuller, Chairman
SKINS International Trading AG

The letter can be found from the link below.

http://www.skins.net/en-AU/index.aspx

More comparison to clowns and Gaddafi?

Does he know that Hein has promised to sue anyone that says that?

Dave.
 
Sep 4, 2012
250
0
9,030
thehog said:
The UCI don't face pressure. From whom? From where?

Yes, just like the IOC, FIFA and other sports bodies there's not many ways to pressurize top management of the UCI, even with damning newspaper items and even with evidence of fraud.

I wonder though what the response would be if there is further loss of top sponsors like Rabobank?
 
Apr 26, 2011
20
0
0
Tinman said:
And here a really great article in a leading dutch newspaper "Volkskrant". By a journalism student for C***st sake. Good on her. Press google translate, you'll get the drift.

One of the best, to-the-point articles I've read.
 
Cramps said:
Yes, just like the IOC, FIFA and other sports bodies there's not many ways to pressurize top management of the UCI, even with damning newspaper items and even with evidence of fraud.

I wonder though what the response would be if there is further loss of top sponsors like Rabobank?

Rabobank is a major loss. Rabobank do much more than sponsor the Pro team. Their investment is huge. They are involved ground up and through women's teams and cyclocross.

Rabobank are blaming the UCI and rightfully so. The Barredo case is indictitive of this. They allowed Rabo to hire him and then they begin a case from 2 years ago. Rabo can see the Armstromg's profile and I'm sure it makes them wonder what's going on.

I think also the selective nature of team ProTour status and the obvious adulation of Sky are reason.

Alas I don't think the UCI cares. They're way too compromised on too many levels to truly make a change.
 
thehog said:
Rabobank is a major loss. Rabobank do much more than sponsor the Pro team. Their investment is huge. They are involved ground up and through women's teams and cyclocross.

Rabobank are blaming the UCI and rightfully so. The Barredo case is indictitive of this. They allowed Rabo to hire him and then they begin a case from 2 years ago. Rabo can see the Armstromg's profile and I'm sure it makes them wonder what's going on.

I think also the selective nature of team ProTour status and the obvious adulation of Sky are reason.

Alas I don't think the UCI cares. They're way too compromised on too many levels to truly make a change.

Rabobank stays committed to the development team and amateur races and teams though. They only stop sponsoring (officially, they will continue to pay for at least a year) the professional teams.
 
Jul 13, 2012
263
0
0
thehog said:
What pressure? Pressure that they might need to change the upholstery on the board room chairs. Pressure that they might need some new art work in the hallways.

The UCI don't face pressure. From whom? From where?

The only real 'pressure' they face is finacial, the Rabobank departure would if I had any role in the UCI, be a real warning sign, to even the most idiotic amongst them.
 
Arnout said:
Rabobank stays committed to the development team and amateur races and teams though. They only stop sponsoring (officially, they will continue to pay for at least a year) the professional teams.

Exactly my point. You have a sponsor who has a genuine interest in the sport ground up. They've received little support from the UCI. You have McQuaid fawning over Sky but they've have hardly put in the same commitment as Rabo have over a number of years.

The team will fold within one year. Just like T-Mobile/High Road.
 
Jul 13, 2012
263
0
0
thehog said:
Exactly my point. You have a sponsor who has a genuine interest in the sport ground up. They've received little support from the UCI. You have McQuaid fawning over Sky but they've have hardly put in the same commitment as Rabo have over a number of years.

The team will fold within one year. Just like T-Mobile/High Road.

been thinking the same for a while now, I can see Sky quietly slipping out of the limelight in order to keep Brads victory in tact. DB's hardly going to struggle for job offers is he, Cav's already seen the light.....
 
RichWalk said:
The only real 'pressure' they face is finacial, the Rabobank departure would if I had any role in the UCI, be a real warning sign, to even the most idiotic amongst them.

It should. It's painfully obvious to see from the USADA case the UCI are more concerned with "stepping around the blame" and not with a full investigation into what happened and why. Their goal in that case is avoiding being caught out and not with cleaning up the sport.
 
RichWalk said:
been thinking the same for a while now, I can see Sky quietly slipping out of the limelight in order to keep Brads victory in tact. DB's hardly going to struggle for job offers is he, Cav's already seen the light.....

They've been spooked. They cannot afford to be caught out. The USADA case was like looking into the future for them. If Armstrong can be brought down then anything can happen.

Off topic now but Porte will go soon. No way he'll stay. He has a future in the sport and he's caught up it very badly.

Sky's performances will be interesting next year. Cav would have been a real asset to them without their fuel injected GT riders.
 
Jul 13, 2012
263
0
0
thehog said:
They've been spooked. They cannot afford to be caught out. The USADA case was like looking into the future for them. If Armstrong can be brought down then anything can happen.

Off topic now but Porte will go soon. No way he'll stay. He has a future in the sport and he's caught up it very badly.

Sky's performances will be interesting next year. Cav would have been a real asset to them without their fuel injected GT riders.

+1, the teflon coating has gone in pro cycling. I may be wrong by assuming some intellect resides somewhere at the UCI but its interesting to see where they realign their allegances going forward.

Millar is getting a lot of grief (IMO much of it deserved) in his role as a 'born again cyclist' however I think his positioning and timing is very astute, he and JV could come out of this mess in a very strong position indeed.
 
Aug 27, 2012
1,436
0
0
thehog said:
Alas I don't think the UCI cares. They're way too compromised on too many levels to truly make a change.

I suspect the UCI is mostly a pretty good group of people. I suspect the problems would disappear very quickly if the 2 top guys were to move.

Up to the national feds now to have some behind the scene phone calls, get a majority together, press for an extraordinary meeting and move the sport forward. Enough is enough. Before the damage to sponsors becomes too great.
 
RichWalk said:
+1, the teflon coating has gone in pro cycling. I may be wrong by assuming some intellect resides somewhere at the UCI but its interesting to see where they realign their allegances going forward.

Millar is getting a lot of grief (IMO much of it deserved) in his role as a 'born again cyclist' however I think his positioning and timing is very astute, he and JV could come out of this mess in a very strong position indeed.

You only have to read the UCI statement to know what's going on. They're trying to blame the Barredo case on Rabo. They have little interest in their sponsors. So sad. And "high public interest in past doping" issues? It's the public?

The UCI acknowledges the decision of Rabobank to withdraw from cycling after 17 years of involvement with the sport as principal sponsor of one of the best known teams of the peloton.

In light of the difficult period, namely the high public interest in past doping issues and perhaps a more recent action taken by the UCI against a rider of the team, the UCI understands the context which has led to this decision being reached.
 
RichWalk said:
+1, the teflon coating has gone in pro cycling. I may be wrong by assuming some intellect resides somewhere at the UCI but its interesting to see where they realign their allegances going forward.

Millar is getting a lot of grief (IMO much of it deserved) in his role as a 'born again cyclist' however I think his positioning and timing is very astute, he and JV could come out of this mess in a very strong position indeed.

So far Radio Millar comes across as a hyena gnawing at the UCI carcass after other people delivered a serious (fatal?) blow.

And it's not like he is alone at that.

So **** him
 
Aug 25, 2012
51
0
0
Big Daddy said:
Oops. Sorry. I was a bit naive in forgetting that many other forum users here aren't in the US like me. ESPN is the biggest sports channel in all of North America, including US, Canada, and Mexico. If I am not mistaken Eurosport is the biggest in Europe, and SBS the biggest in Australia.

Hopefully, that video will load for you guys outside of N. America. It is quite good and worth a couple minutes of watching.

SBS's Mike Tomilaris gave a radio interview last week about the USADA report. He openly denounced Armstrong as a cheat and a liar. When the radio host commented on LAs charity work citing his personal donation of 6 mil to Livestrong, Tomilars questioned it. Said he didn't believe one word that came out of Armstrong as if to suggest that his lies stretch to all aspects of his character..not just cycling. It was music to my ears. Sorry I cannot find a link.