Jonathan:
Just read your editorial on cyclingnews ("connecting the dots"). Apparently you are hurt by folks who have only incomplete information and thus make sometimes inappropriate leaps of logic and assumption. You express your frustration.
Fair enough. Let me propose a way to clear up all of this hurt and resentment:
1. Just tell us exactly what you've done (PED-wise) during your career.
2. Just tell us exactly what your current riders have done in the past.
3. Just tell us which of your guys talked to Kimmage, and what they said to "shock" him?
Would that be so difficult? We already have a decent picture of what has gone on. Anybody w/ some curiousity can read Kimmage's writings, Floyd's interviews, listen to audiotapes online, etc. But unless you just come out and BE HONEST with us, then yes OF COURSE we will only have a muddled picture of actual events, based on INCOMPLETE information.
You seem like a very intelligent guy. This cannot be too hard for you to grasp. We will look forward to your post in this regards.
PS: While I make this posting in complete sincerity, please don't insult us by suggesting that our reasoning skills are any less than the cycling media's "journalists who have researched the story". C'mon man. C'mon. The state-run media of most Arab dictatorships has more integrity.
Just read your editorial on cyclingnews ("connecting the dots"). Apparently you are hurt by folks who have only incomplete information and thus make sometimes inappropriate leaps of logic and assumption. You express your frustration.
Fair enough. Let me propose a way to clear up all of this hurt and resentment:
1. Just tell us exactly what you've done (PED-wise) during your career.
2. Just tell us exactly what your current riders have done in the past.
3. Just tell us which of your guys talked to Kimmage, and what they said to "shock" him?
Would that be so difficult? We already have a decent picture of what has gone on. Anybody w/ some curiousity can read Kimmage's writings, Floyd's interviews, listen to audiotapes online, etc. But unless you just come out and BE HONEST with us, then yes OF COURSE we will only have a muddled picture of actual events, based on INCOMPLETE information.
You seem like a very intelligent guy. This cannot be too hard for you to grasp. We will look forward to your post in this regards.
PS: While I make this posting in complete sincerity, please don't insult us by suggesting that our reasoning skills are any less than the cycling media's "journalists who have researched the story". C'mon man. C'mon. The state-run media of most Arab dictatorships has more integrity.