The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Well, we are including the other classics. Those for sure lower the score. they were just bad. The other ones were a 2. So we have 5 for the Ardennes and 2 for PR, TdF and MSR that makes the average a 3.5. If we put more weight on the monuments then is a 3.Red Rick banned???? was he a moderator in here. No lost love here!
LOL.
5.
Fleche and Amstel Ok.
Liege. Bad
I won't. that's how I know they were bad. I usually repeat the races that I consider good. I have had no interest in watching these races. I only went to watch the Fleche again just because of the epic conditions. The other ones were just plain bad. We were robbed of the great duels this year. It is nobody's fault, but it is what it is.Come on folks, we will watch these races next season. And complain again how boring it was, you know it.
Come on folks, we will watch these races next season. And complain again how boring it was, you know it.
In fairness, Liege hasn't been one of the best races for like a decade+. But other than that, I totally agree.Why would we necessarily complain again? I rarely rate things particularly low but when you have the four usually best races completely bereft of suspense, it's not a good classics season. And a cold FW will not be able to save that.