fatsprintking said:
So aren't you just reinforcing that cars always have right of way and creating a drama for he next rider that that driver feels will defer to them. I understand what you are saying and agree that we should always make the assumption that we have not been seen, but I personally think you have to encourage all road users to stick to the rules. Being cautious at intersecting and always vigilant to the need to take evasive action is different to just letting the car have right of way simply because they are a car.
I find the confusion caused by the vague communication of "eye contact" to be unreliable and unsafe. If I make eye contact, how does this translate into a clear understanding of what will happen next? They could simply be thinking, "oh, great that bike rider has seen me so will defer to the might of my massive SUV".
Don't get me wrong, I'll take the right of way of it is mine, but I will always make the same assumption that the driver will try to kill me and therefore I will have an escape route planned. For example, if a car arrives at a stop sign on the side road (and rolls through of course - they
always do), I won't waste my time making eye contact, but will ride with the assumption that they have NOT seen me and will pull out into my path. I'll quickly check behind, ready to swerve, cover my brakes, slow if I need to. I'll only give way to avoid a collision if that's the last resort. Eye contact doesn't give me any assurance that the car driver will yield.