Tapeworm said:
No... just, no.
I like the Vibrams, I use them for a bit of running to keep form and conditioning in the legs. But for cycling? Nope, different actions, different requirements. Wouldn't want to crash in them either.
Yeah, the crashing is scary with Vibrams. For this reason I won't wear them on my mountain bike, too many roots, rocks, and just scary stuff to bang your foot against. On the road it would be nasty, but no more nasty maybe than any other body part.
Tinman said:
cycling shoe soles need to be very stiff for optimal power transfer - its the large upper leg muscle groups that do most of the cycling work. Which is why all good cycling shoes are made with carbon fibre soles.
But they do strengthen the muscles in your feet, ankles, and calves. And also help you to feel better and work better the overall motion. Well, at least that is my experience.
And, if as you suggest the overall aim is to have more power transfer, then I would think relying only on the soles of the cycling shoes can be improved upon.
I'm talking about training here, not racing.