Reading some of the SAS biographies recounting the selection process, it's pretty clear the first thing you need in the British special forces at least is phenomenal endurance. Don't know about the Americans, it seems they're more into weight lifting and getting huge than developing endurance.
In these first hand accounts (Andy McNab, Chris Ryan), potential recruits don't even get near any nifty new equipment until they have done an incredible amount of running and navigation - not to get them fit but to see who cannot hack the punishing schedule. There's no injury prevention or thought given to adequate sleep or rest, they are trying to see who breaks down physically or mentally and if you're not up to it then bye bye, and the vast majority of the work in the early section we would call endurance or ultra endurance work, running or tabbing all night long carrying a ridiculous amount of weight and navigating point to point with all timings being recorded.
I can't find the quote but I read a military dude mention something like - "the ethical considerations in sport do not apply in warfare, any advantage we can give our soldiers we embrace". Despite the cynicism here we know that two people at 60 hematocrit will not perform to the exact same level. Just like two amateurs both with 34 hematocrit might finish a bike race 20 minutes apart, just a like a male pro doped to the gills will ride a lot faster than a female pro doped to the gills. We can say illegal performance enhancement seems to give a percentage boost to whatever your clean capacities may be.
DO they drug test potential recruits? After all you want the talent there for them to boost your capacities as and when necessary. Or is it a case of as long as you get the job done without dropping dead that's good enough however you do it we don't care? Kind of the "show some initiative" attitude.
In these first hand accounts (Andy McNab, Chris Ryan), potential recruits don't even get near any nifty new equipment until they have done an incredible amount of running and navigation - not to get them fit but to see who cannot hack the punishing schedule. There's no injury prevention or thought given to adequate sleep or rest, they are trying to see who breaks down physically or mentally and if you're not up to it then bye bye, and the vast majority of the work in the early section we would call endurance or ultra endurance work, running or tabbing all night long carrying a ridiculous amount of weight and navigating point to point with all timings being recorded.
I can't find the quote but I read a military dude mention something like - "the ethical considerations in sport do not apply in warfare, any advantage we can give our soldiers we embrace". Despite the cynicism here we know that two people at 60 hematocrit will not perform to the exact same level. Just like two amateurs both with 34 hematocrit might finish a bike race 20 minutes apart, just a like a male pro doped to the gills will ride a lot faster than a female pro doped to the gills. We can say illegal performance enhancement seems to give a percentage boost to whatever your clean capacities may be.
DO they drug test potential recruits? After all you want the talent there for them to boost your capacities as and when necessary. Or is it a case of as long as you get the job done without dropping dead that's good enough however you do it we don't care? Kind of the "show some initiative" attitude.