Remco was an absolute alien. No possible arguments.
And now he’s not.
Third at LBL outsprinting all the also-rans. Reminds me of LeMond’s last gasp finishing 8 secs behind Indurain in the first (70+ km!!) ITT in the 1991 TDF before becoming pack fodder for the rest of his career.
Very reminiscent of early EPO days.
I really don't see the the Lemond - Remco comparison as a fitting one, or persuasive in arguing your point.
Remco has been very unlucky with numerous crashes for many years - that shows in his development imo.
While Pogacar has basically always been superior GC and climbing wise. They arguably should be more evenly matched in one-days than they are.
This can be explained by several factors:
- Remco injuries
- Difference in team support and equipment (in race)
- Difference in team support and prep (out of race)
- Innate difference in the key race winning trait (explosiveness on climbs)
- Tactical astuteness (Pogacar is 10x smarter than Remco in races)
- Difference in PED's or banned methods?
Don't see why it has to be the latter or why that is the most likely option for their difference in level. I still think Remco can grow to another level if he gets a long clean run without crashes, setback etc.