This is a bad example because his poor record in championships is exactly why LeBron is not in the goat convo. He's more like the Valverde of hoopers.
-
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Anyone who thinks mou was not sent by pog is kind of foolish i guess
No. This one is better.
Tadej Pogacar: "I can see your ass."
Remco Evenepoel: "I would like to see more of yours and not from 500 meters away."
Jonas on Remcos wheel, "Remco, when will you attack?".
Remco, "I'm attacking"
Jonas, "I'll show you how to attack, see you at the finish line"
Remco having a Pidcok moment.
Last edited:
No need to worry for the next couple of years, he's signed up for military service.
At least he is bad at something
I don't think that kind of haircut (or its severity) is flattering on anyone, where's a helmet when you need it?
View: https://x.com/CyclingUpToDat3/status/1856676225764208677?t=7D2ctira7NrnxqcvozbPAQ&s=19
Eddy dont fall for this trap🤣
Eddy dont fall for this trap🤣
PSA for any young lads out there, you aren't meant to turn up a the hairdressers 5 minutes before it closes, please make sure the barber is using scissors and clippers, rather than a knife and fork.
He said that he will probably ride 2 GT's next year and then maybe one or possibly no GT at all as he "doesn't like to be away from home".
Or so I read at least.
Its ironic how people consider merckx a goat and armstrong a froud when both actually got caught doping multiple times in their career with only the later getting the stick for his behavior to cover up his sh**😖 If it wasn't for his bad attitudes towards some riders we would've still considered him the greatest GT rider with 7 consecutive tdf wins🤭. Even if i'm a die hard pogi fan i wouldn't even mention his name amongst the best if he got caught doping 3 times as merckx was.
Pogacar succeeded in some races because other riders chose not to take him on directly. Not all events but the Giro was a sad promenade behind him. The Tour was a closer reality for about 2 weeks and then everyone settled into their petty fights for the lower placings. So, yes; if they do that in 2025 the results could be the same.
They will all start out healthy save for the unknowns of Vindegaard's recovery to form. That could take some time and, if it does Visma will need to be realistic and pick a #1 rider that they'll give full support.
To be fair, though, 'doping before 1989' =/= 'doping after 1989'.
Amphetamines etc. vs. blood doping.
Even Coppi and Ferdi Kübler were, admittedly, taking 'The Bomb'.
"Too bad that" Coppi's bomb was most likely closer to caffeine than to EPO, and not for a lack of trying (to make it more potent).
Also I personally think of Lance as a 7 TdF winner. Even more so given that the wins of Mr60%, Jan, Pantani and such, weren't scraped off, and those 7 weren't given to anyone else either (and we all know why).
Though, yeah, especially during 1990-2010 (or at least till 2008) you must consider all results as having an asterisk*.
Last edited:
Wait... what?
1) Vingo is fine.
It's not like what happened to him was the same as Egan Bernal, who 12 months later was still struggling to stay with the "mid" group.
Jonas might've not been 100% but in 2024 he was the only one able to follow Pog on the 'San Luca', he won a stage, and ended the GT at second place.
2)Let's assume for the moment Vingegaard will only be at "90%" at the next Tour:
who else could Visma pick as a #1 TdF rider?
Outbid Redbull and offer Remco 13 million per year, betting on him improving a ton uphill?
I don't get it.
Is this now the doping forum? Because it will just spiral into an abyss of conspiracy and innuendo. I am not naive to where we have been and what could be going on, but I find forum threads about what anonymous randos think riders might be doing based on whatever to be uninteresting at best.
Vingegaard will be better than ever. My question is how much can Pogacar improve? If he improves, no one will give him a fight.
There should be a limit up to where Pogacar and Vingegaard (and Evenepoel for that matter) improve. I find it hard to believe that Pogacar can improve any further (without visiting different part of the forum) and Vingegaard being 28 should be close to his limit as well.
There are always outliers. Nobody knows when Pogacar will reach his physiological peak.
Another outlier was Valverde. AV’s career longevity was off the charts. Turned pro very young and was competitive well into his late 30s. But AV was only a 2nd tier Grand Tour contender.
Another example I can think of is Cadel Evans. Cadel won the Tour at 34 but apparently his best numbers were in 2007, aged 30.
No idea when Pogacar will begin to decline but my guess would be after he turns 30.
Last edited:
TRENDING THREADS
-
Teams & Riders The Remco Evenepoel is the next Eddy Merckx thread- Started by DNP-Old
- Replies: 29K
-
Teams & Riders The Great Big Cycling Transfers, Extensions, and Rumours Thread- Started by RedheadDane
- Replies: 11K
-
Teams & Riders Alberto Contador Discussion Thread- Started by LaFlorecita
- Replies: 51K
-
Teams & Riders Tadej Pogačar discussion thread- Started by Lequack
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Teams & Riders Everybody needs a little bit of Roglstomp in their lives- Started by johnymax
- Replies: 19K
-
Teams & Riders Chris Froome Discussion Thread.- Started by Miburo
- Replies: 21K
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
RedheadDane's Cycling Christmas Calendar - 4th Edition- Latest: Armchair Cyclist
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram