• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Tadej Pogacar and Mauro Giannetti

Page 259 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Unlike Armstrong, Froome, Contador during previous eras when the speculation was accompanied by enough anecdotal evidence to draw your own conclusions if you were bothered or cared enough about doping.

Which just shows how well UAE and Pog have played this from a PR perspective.
Nah I don't think that's UAE, the same can be said about all their competitors. It's been the rule for many years. We're almost completely in the dark largely because that's how things work in the current era. It's something for the State of the Peloton thread, not about Pogačar or UAE specifically.
 
Nah I don't think that's UAE, the same can be said about all their competitors. It's been the rule for many years. We're almost completely in the dark largely because that's how things work in the current era. It's something for the State of the Peloton thread, not about Pogačar or UAE specifically.
I agree that it's certainly not specific to UAE and I'd say that Jumbo and Sky before them were indeed much more PR conscious in trying to force a certain narrative upon the public. To some extent the other teams have to hail Pogs brilliance or at worst ignore it because they are all inter linked and are eating from the same pie.

Jumbo for instance aren't going to complain publicly about Pogacars performances when they have produced the only rider who could live with him in the last 4 seasons. If he was dirty then what would that say about Vingegaard. The only response will be to try and figure out a new and better way of competing with him.

Even the riders much lower down the food chain benefit from the money that UAE and Pogacar help to generate. Those with the strongest principles will simply exit the sport.
 
Even the riders much lower down the food chain benefit from the money that UAE and Pogacar help to generate. Those with the strongest principles will simply exit the sport.
Also the variable that some doctors/DS probably refuses to do the heavier programs. I still haphazard that Ineos right now falls into that category. It doesn't mean they're clean, just that they don't go all out on the new/heavier things.

But yeah others are definitely phased out.
 
well there was weird heated discussion between Pog's tech and commissaire who wanted to take Pog's bike when he was celebrating with Urska - it was just a brief moment of drone/heli shot but it did seemed weird. but can't see it possible that the uci will be so stupid to not check the bike he actually rode. that would be next level stupidity or ridiculous level of corruption.
Three crank arms on Pog's bike should have been a dead giveaway, frankly.
 
well there was weird heated discussion between Pog's tech and commissaire who wanted to take Pog's bike when he was celebrating with Urska - it was just a brief moment of drone/heli shot but it did seemed weird. but can't see it possible that the uci will be so stupid to not check the bike he actually rode. that would be next level stupidity or ridiculous level of corruption.
Do we have any video available?
 
  • Like
Reactions: noob and CJCycling
Are you Cycling Highlights testing out the script for your next video?
Close. Actually, I am Tom D. from this picture.

EiTDO0PWoAkAuV2
 
  • Wow
Reactions: noob
I read that but if this is done consistently it's bound to raise some eyebrows and at the very least some protests from other teams.
This was likely just a glitch in the system. As one member has already pointed out, the current s***-show is not simply the crooks from UAE against others eager to expose them. It's more "global" than that. For example, the journalists not even mentioning any suspicions has been rightly noted here on numerous occasions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gratemans
From the Guardian.



This is both a celebration of Pogacar, as well as raising the question of doping. But rather than confront the question Jonathan Lieuw dismisses it for aesthetic reasons.

"None of it has ever remotely interested me, and not out of an indifference to science or sporting morality"

No but see that's exactly what it is Jonathan. He might express it with the kind of faux-magniloquence you see a lot in the guardian, but he's effectively admitting to a dereliction of duty. I can completely understand weary fans like us taking the 'pro wrestling' approach to the sport, I know loads on here do. For one who is meant to be a journalist, admitting that he takes a completely amoral stance towards these matters in the name of enjoyment completely reduces his role to no more than that of a cheerleader. They should be sceptical, they should question and probe, but there are very few journalists left in cycling, it's easier to just write wordy think-pieces from an ivory tower.

[[content deleted]]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"None of it has ever remotely interested me, and not out of an indifference to science or sporting morality"

No but see that's exactly what it is Jonathan. He might express it with the kind of faux-magniloquence you see a lot in the guardian, but he's effectively admitting to a dereliction of duty. I can completely understand weary fans like us taking the 'pro wrestling' approach to the sport, I know loads on here do. For one who is meant to be a journalist, admitting that he takes a completely amoral stance towards these matters in the name of enjoyment completely reduces his role to no more than that of a cheerleader. They should be sceptical, they should question and probe, but there are very few journalists left in cycling, it's easier to just write wordy think-pieces from an ivory tower.

Video isn't meant to be a political statement, more a comment on the nature of journalism in England;

It's a general issue in cycling journalism. A lot of the journalists buddy up with the riders, they keep in touch privately and maintain an almost friend-like relationship that makes it borderline impossible for the journalists to start asking uncomfortable and unpleasant questions.
 
what? FORGIVEN? who are we to forgive a rider or not?
I've come to learn that athletes INSIDE the sport do not think like us, do not behave like WE want them to, do not weight their priorities like we do. "he'd have left UAE". that's veeery delusional. really. pro cycling is not fair, is not good vs bad. it a pro sport without the nuance we'd wish as fans. we can imagine, paint a rider as we wish, but it's a cut-throat sport and they ALL know what they are doing
He'd care if he was clean.
 
It's a general issue in cycling journalism. A lot of the journalists buddy up with the riders, they keep in touch privately and maintain an almost friend-like relationship that makes it borderline impossible for the journalists to start asking uncomfortable and unpleasant questions.
Journalism has been dead in the west for a long time IMO, the truth isn't what's most important for them..
 
I agree that it's certainly not specific to UAE and I'd say that Jumbo and Sky before them were indeed much more PR conscious in trying to force a certain narrative upon the public. To some extent the other teams have to hail Pogs brilliance or at worst ignore it because they are all inter linked and are eating from the same pie.

Jumbo for instance aren't going to complain publicly about Pogacars performances when they have produced the only rider who could live with him in the last 4 seasons. If he was dirty then what would that say about Vingegaard. The only response will be to try and figure out a new and better way of competing with him.

Even the riders much lower down the food chain benefit from the money that UAE and Pogacar help to generate. Those with the strongest principles will simply exit the sport.
Same as it ever was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CJCycling and noob
once again (I already asked before) where does the NEED to believe of some come from? many watch the races without needing to believe in this or that view. they just watch it. is the small-world-view of the aura around an athlete so important to some?
example: Pog gave that bottle to the kid. fine, great gesture, very photographic. if I was a Pog fan that would give me joy expecially because the anti-Pog fans would hate that picture (look at that he acts this way they are scamming us with the good boy stuff)

but I have no dog in the fight with Pog. so I look at that pic as a thing that happened, in a Giro I didn't enjoy that much. but i didn't hate it nor him.

I think the desire to believe involves a small part of the fans, and all the others that want them to "open their eyes" are just wasting their time arguing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noob
For me it's not about the "cleanliness", but who is behind the operation and where does the money come from. Don't get me wrong, everywhere the corporate world has a million skeletons in the closet. So it's not about morality in the strictest sense, but when something goes beyond all decency. When the quantity of money and special interests allow something so surreal and thus so farcical to get passed off as legitimate sport, despite the talent, the hegemony becomes intolerable. Too much is too much, in other words. Let the arms race continue and pretend as if it's not happening. Are you not entertained?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Cassirer and noob
Sivakov doing +500 watts (7.4 watt/kg) for almost 10 minutes while drafting in Pogacar's wheel :dizzy: Are we sure that a motor in Pogacar's bike can't be part of the explanation? A rich team with access to official control equipement (x-ray, tablets...) and a lab to test the e-bike in all possible conditions could find ways to hide the motor, battery and gears.