Guess we are well and truly *** thenResolve of the UCI versus those who seek an unfair advantage.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Guess we are well and truly *** thenResolve of the UCI versus those who seek an unfair advantage.
That was as much for tactical reasons as was to suck up to the French media. Johan Bruyneel still talks that kind of tactics on his podcast. Additionally, it did not endear LA much to anybody as it seems.Its called politics, history shows that's not the case, Lance Armstrong would regularly 'gift' the yellow jersey and stages away, often to French riders to get on side with the French media. UAE don't very often let brakes get away, overtime this will frustrate other teams, and they will suffer from their greed. Look what happend to Pantani in the 1999 Giro when he got greedy and took the piss out of his rivals or when Armstrong got greedy and made a comeback. History shows greedy riders get punished.
The thing is, I believe, that even if Pog is cheating he would not consider it as cheating. We have heard that many people who confessed said that they kinda knew it was wrong but that everybody was doing it (obviously they would say this rather than plainly "yes I wanted to dope to be better) and therefore what they were doing is really just playing on a level field. Additionally, if one trains all the time and puts as much work in being the best as the top riders (Pog included) there is no way one should be thinking of giving away a victory other than to a teammate.I would argue the way to do that (certainly if you're cheating) involves considering how much you can get away with.
Because it can't be hidden and nothing posted here says they exist. It is only possible with UCI collusion. It would already be tried in Formula 1 if it was technically feasible.
Nah…. It’s just that Cummings is a useless DS and he pointed it out. I am guessing he’s said worse in private and the rumour is that he told them that he is leavingReturning to that discussion. Did you see that Pidcock was deselected by "management decision" and not based on performance. Recalling that he seems to by a spunky outspoken kid, would you not say that my original hypothesis may not have been all that wrong after all. Say, during a pre-race team meeting, discussing tactics for Lombardia, he blurbs something like "good luck trying to follow an e-bike". And, for the team management that was already filled in on the rules of the game for this year, that's a bit too much to allow. Thus, "deselection by management decision."
Not difficult or expensive to pull every single bike apart before and after every race/stage?Inspection. Bikes can be pulled apart. Bottom brackets, seat tubes, wheels. hubs. Not difficult or expensive to police.
. Formula 1 is highly regulated including restricting the use of supplementary electric motors to recycle otherwise wasted energy (how much power the motors provide). F1 is also way more technical and complicated than bicycles - including any with possible motors. If you can't hide motors in F1 I can't see how its possible to hide motors on bikes checked by trained UCI mechanics. And as I mentioned even with reduced budgets recently, F1 money dwarfs what UAE would be willing to spend. Only collusion (corruption) allows for this. Not saying that isn't possible.Yeah, just imagine if they were to start using motors in F1...
No. Very simple for trained mechanics. And they don't pull apart every bike - only the stage winners. Pretty sure those are the race regs now?Not difficult or expensive to pull every single bike apart before and after every race/stage?
Don't quote me on this but what they are supposed to be doing is to X-Ray the stage/race winner's bike using a big portable X-Ray machine along with 4/5 other bikes from the top ten.No. Very simple for trained mechanics. And they don't pull apart every bike - only the stage winners. Pretty sure those are the race regs now?
I think the UCI has been checking for motors for a few years now. And not just X-Ray machines or thermal detectors but physically pulling apart the race winners bike after each stage. If this is right, then Pog's bike should have been inspected for every one of the 6 stages he won at the Tour. I still think blood manipulation, collusion or combination of both are more likely than motors.Don't quote me on this but what they are supposed to be doing is to X-Ray the stage/race winner's bike using a big portable X-Ray machine along with 4/5 other bikes from the top ten.
But said X-Ray machine needs a truck to transport/house so I am not sure whether it's used outside of Grand Tours, Monuments etc.
They also have the ipads and I've heard that they have thermal cameras in the comissaire's car(s) that they make random checks with.
Now whether or not they are doing what they claim to be doing is a different matter, the last article I'd found on this was from 2018 (I think it was cycling weekly or bikeradar) but I can't be asked to look for it now. It's something though that a semi-competent and somewhat curious journalist could easily find out. And that is why I am sceptical (though a lot more receptive) regarding motor doping, you have all kinds of people that have access to bikes before stages, from journalists to youtubers and pocasters, all it takes is someone who knows what to look for and have the means to look for it and you'll be on youtube...
I don't think motor doping is being used by Pogacar . Its a bit like suggesting that Elvis is still alive and the moon landings were staged as the flag was fluttering. For one thing UCI would have no reason to be in collusion with UAE nor would they want to. I am not that cynical. And I cant see Pog doing it anyway as it is too riskyDo you guys think that motor doping is actually being used? I just refuse to believe it.
In theory yes, but in practical testing, it is more complicated. The only reason the Clear, a friggin steroid, became testable was because a syringe was mailed in with the substance and Caitlin developed a test. So, not all new things are actually identifiable and therefore testable.I also don't buy the some new substance meme. Any new substance is in theory detectable. Even if the substance itself has left the bloodstream or urine usually there are markers which can detected. Remember Contador got nailed for having a minute proportion of clenbuturol in his blood. Blood manipulation via autologous infusion is always harder to nail which is why the passport was developed to check against a rider's biological baseline.
Interesting. I should know this but is there more rigorous testing and/or testing by a different organization at the Olympics?I don't think motor doping is being used by Pogacar . Its a bit like suggesting that Elvis is still alive and the moon landings were staged as the flag was fluttering. For one thing UCI would have no reason to be in collusion with UAE nor would they want to. I am not that cynical. And I cant see Pog doing it anyway as it is too risky
When we talk about doping I dont believe we are talking about doing something that is from the current banned list of PEDs or anything that is a mechanical advantage
However I do believe that Pog has this year been riding with an advantage, that is new , that the others have not yet caught up with and though probably not illegal (yet) is morally questionable. I think he and UAE can wholeheartedly say and think that they are clean as their advantage cannot be pointed to as such/illegal by anyone from the UCI
What can it be ? I dont know but you would have to be as blind as a bat not to see his improvement since last year and his miraculous ability to never get tired are not normal. Top riders are on their hands and knees after races and he is still jumping up and down and is never ever tired. On rest days he doesn't even have to rest.
This whole zone 2 and more sugar explanations is so ridiculous. A human body gets tired esp after racing 2 GTs. He does not seem to recognise that alot of how he behaves makes it all more questionable though the comms on ES would have you believe its all down to his physiology
In the 2023 Tour when he bonked and said he was 'dead' was like some turning point for him . I think he knew then he was going to do anything to not be there again in that position. Pogacar has a massive ego that he camouflages very well but he hates being beaten.
I also think his decision to not go to the Olympics now looks very shady when in his form he could have been walking away with Olympic gold and its hard to believe he did not want a chance at that achievement
Not an achievement of Merkx ? Would have elevated Pog's year and palmares into the stratosphere.
Unless the others get on the programme or UAE/Pog are sanctioned for whatever they are up to we are going to see alot of Pog domination.Oh well it just means I wont be watching much cycling in 2025. I love the sport for the unpredictability and tactics , none of which are on display in the world of domination. Its just so unexciting
In theory yes, but in practical testing, it is more complicated. The only reason the Clear, a friggin steroid, became testable was because a syringe was mailed in with the substance and Caitlin developed a test. So, not all new things are actually identifiable and therefore testable.
If you think I am claiming this because I am Vingegaard fan you are absolutely wrong.yet you have no problem watching Jonas win, interesting
Ik heb dezelfde coach als Pogacar, maar als ik die vergelijk met m’n coach bij Alpecin-Deceuninck, dan ben ik daar niet beter van geworden. Het is ook geen hogere wiskunde natuurlijk.
Totally agree. A good, nuanced analysis.Its my opinion that everyone has every right to question anything in cycling when one considers cycling history. And especially when someone commits himself to the likes of Matxin and Giannetti.
I do not know if Pogacar is doping, like all of us don't. But I am not convinced he's clean 100%. And for me the main reason is his team, Matxin and Giannetti, this will never change for me as long as he rides for those two. I do not understand why these two are even allowed to be there. And secondly I do not understand why a person like Giannetti gets a podium in media without any critical question, at least he gets that type of positive attention in the Dutch media.
That you don't like people here expressing their doubts, in whatever way, albeit some people do it in words no thought of so well. But is that really a problem? I am happy there is this community here where this is possible.
I have been reading this forum for years but never ever making an account or replying. Only now I have done so since I do think whatever is happening in cycling right now is worrysome, if, and its a very big if, pogacar is a doper, it will be bad for the sport to say the least. And every race since the giro I am more and more thinking this may be a possibility.
Apart from Matxin and Giannetti there is one thing I can not understand completely. The way Pogacar has been able to have peak performances in march, april, may, july, september and october. Sure bigger rest/training periods where there in June and August. But I have never ever seen pro cyclists succeed in having so many peak moments in a year, his little one off during the tour this year most likely was due to his confidence and not eating enough. Anyway, I always thought this to be physically impossible. Sure I considered it possible for someone to win all through the year... but with the amazing dominance like we have seen? With the freshness and composure displayed? I can not explain it. And please don't come with the childish GOAT terms... I want to see competition, I absolutely do not care about any type of GOAT.
But in the end, if he's clean and just that good it's not Pogacars fault and I can understand it's annoying that several cycling followers doubt him if he is clean. But hey, that also comes with being the absolute best in the display he puts out there...
You can say the same about Messi and some random guy from Barcelona, who wasn't even able to get into main lineup most of the time.Regarding Pogacar's new training, interesting tidbit of a rider that is leaving and has the same trainer as Pogacar:
Sjoerd Bax verlaat Pogacar en UAE met dubbel gevoel: 'Soms het idee dat ik sterker was dan m’n ploeggenoten'
Sjoerd Bax heeft zich twee seizoenen uitstekend vermwww.indeleiderstrui.nl
Translation: I have the same trainer as Pogacar, but if I compare it to my trainer at Alpecin I haven't gotten any better. It's not complex math of course.
In short: He doesn't see a difference to his training at Alpecin-Deceuninck and it has not gotten him better compared to then. Obvious that there is no secret training sauce at UAE (as sport science is evolution, not revolution) which explains the huge step forwards.
That's not the point of the post quoted in your reply. If the reason for Pog's exceptional results was the training regime of UAE or moving from San Millan to Sola then the benefit would apply to every rider in the team, which is not the case here, therefore the argument is that it is not the training that is special but what is done outside of training that makes the difference.You can say the same about Messi and some random guy from Barcelona, who wasn't even able to get into main lineup most of the time.
Yes, you have the same team and coach but it's not what separates the GOAT and some mediocre athletes.
And I'm not saying Pog is clean, just the perspective is very wrong.
You can say the same about Messi and some random guy from Barcelona, who wasn't even able to get into main lineup most of the time.
Yes, you have the same team and coach but it's not what separates the GOAT and some mediocre athletes.
And I'm not saying Pog is clean, just the perspective is very wrong.
You can say the same about Messi and some random guy from Barcelona, who wasn't even able to get into main lineup most of the time.
Yes, you have the same team and coach but it's not what separates the GOAT and some mediocre athletes.
And I'm not saying Pog is clean, just the perspective is very wrong.
Yup. This should have been the baseline expectation to anyone who has ridden themselves and/or know the basic principles of training. Especially at the pro levels of loading, the secret really is that there is no secret. A good coach will ensure the athletes absorb as much as they can without digging a hole. It's as much art as science for sure.Regarding Pogacar's new training, interesting tidbit of a rider that is leaving and has the same trainer as Pogacar:
Sjoerd Bax verlaat Pogacar en UAE met dubbel gevoel: 'Soms het idee dat ik sterker was dan m’n ploeggenoten'
Sjoerd Bax heeft zich twee seizoenen uitstekend vermwww.indeleiderstrui.nl
Translation: I have the same trainer as Pogacar, but if I compare it to my trainer at Alpecin I haven't gotten any better. It's not complex math of course.
In short: He doesn't see a difference to his training at Alpecin-Deceuninck and it has not gotten him better compared to then. Obvious that there is no secret training sauce at UAE (as sport science is evolution, not revolution) which explains the huge step forwards.
UAE doesn't like the Olympics. Except for Ayuso and Politt, none of the UAE TdF team was at the Olympics. Of the UAE riders featuring in the top25 performances of 2024 according to Watts2win (Pogacar, Yates, Almeida, Torres and Ulissi), none of them was at the Olympics.P.S. I am not sure about Olympic testing but I was of the opinion that it was as advanced as you could get plus tries to be in line with emerging science. I imagine it is along way in front of the UCI
They dont select the riders for the Olympics.UAE doesn't like the Olympics. Except for Ayuso and Politt, none of the UAE TdF team was at the Olympics. Of the UAE riders featuring in the top25 performances of 2024 according to Watts2win (Pogacar, Yates, Almeida, Torres and Ulissi), none of them was at the Olympics.