I always understood team rank in a stage race to be combined time of top three placed riders from the team. On Cyclingnews and on letour.fr, ALM is listed atop team rank despite three Astana riders in the top four! How can that be?
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
gianni p said:I always understood team rank in a stage race to be combined time of top three placed riders from the team. On Cyclingnews and on letour.fr, ALM is listed atop team rank despite three Astana riders in the top four! How can that be?
ilillillli said:not to be a jerk, but try checking a few threads before you start a new one... or even consult wikipedia before posting a question. not that it's not legitimate, but we covered this one literally yesterday: http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=2173
also, wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_Tour_de_France#Team_classification
welcome to the forums.
Dr. Maserati said:Ilillillli - I am so proud
And I second what you said - welcome to the forum!
gianni p said:I always understood team rank in a stage race to be combined time of top three placed riders from the team. On Cyclingnews and on letour.fr, ALM is listed atop team rank despite three Astana riders in the top four! How can that be?