This commentary by Paolo Bettini in today's Gazzetta dello Sport succinctly expresses why British cycling has its limits (though the imperious style of racing, which is effective at the Tour, but not elsewhere, especially in one-day races, began with US Postal) and why the romantic style of racing is unfortunately on the wane. It's also why, in the age of hyper-commercialization at the Tour, this style of racing is producing champions, who, without the numbers and the radio-link, tele-commanding of the team by the DS, don't know how to race their bikes like the champions of old.
Bettini: “I admire the British for what they have done in cycling, however, the races aren’t only watts and power outputs, but fantasy, resourcefulness, courage and opportunism. In bad weather they get lost, because they can’t rely upon a strategy of dictating the law based on the power outputs of their riders. It’s much simpler for them to manage a grand tour, dividing for example the climbs up into sectors among their various riders and use power numbers to make the selection. Cycling, though, is also something else.”
Bettini: “I admire the British for what they have done in cycling, however, the races aren’t only watts and power outputs, but fantasy, resourcefulness, courage and opportunism. In bad weather they get lost, because they can’t rely upon a strategy of dictating the law based on the power outputs of their riders. It’s much simpler for them to manage a grand tour, dividing for example the climbs up into sectors among their various riders and use power numbers to make the selection. Cycling, though, is also something else.”