Red Rick
Moderator
Does he blame his bike every time he loses?You can call him Max Perstappen.
Does he blame his bike every time he loses?You can call him Max Perstappen.
Does he blame his bike every time he loses?
Its why I cant stand Formula1 is as big as it is.No.
I would suggest that equipment has more importance in Formula 1 than in cycling, though.
Its why I cant stand Formula1 is as big as it is.
Glad I'm not the only one who hates it!Its why I cant stand Formula1 is as big as it is.
Good news and great to hear, Vader time!Milan Vader is going home and continuing to rehab from there
View: https://www.instagram.com/p/Cc8eWQXMBqP/?utm_source=ig_embed&ig_rid=a0cfaf90-5963-4226-894f-9094f6e6e46b
I make here a question already made in a Giro thread, maybe here is the right place..
The way every year Jumbo visma approach the Giro is really shameful.
All the historical teams (Quick Step, Movistar, Lotto etc.) have an history of 25/30 stage wins in the Giro.
Jumbo Visma only 9 !! (but they have 1 GC win)
In the last year the bring literally ALL the best riders at Le Tour.
What can be the reason ???
I think in the netherlands there is interest for the Giro (the starting in Amsterdam 2010 and the enthusiasm for Tom win in 2017 were incredible)
Some Dutch here have an explanation ?
Other examples: Van der Poel is at the Giro. One among Mike Teunissen or Wout Van Aert could have been at Giro too (maybe only for the first 7-10 days when there are many stage thay could have won and then retire to prepare the Tour)
Sepp Kuss could have been a good leader, maybe best than Foss.
They prefer to bring in italy not their second line, but their third line !
I make here a question already made in a Giro thread, maybe here is the right place..
The way every year Jumbo visma approach the Giro is really shameful.
All the historical teams (Quick Step, Movistar, Lotto etc.) have an history of 25/30 stage wins in the Giro.
Jumbo Visma only 9 !! (but they have 1 GC win)
In the last year the bring literally ALL the best riders at Le Tour.
What can be the reason ???
I think in the netherlands there is interest for the Giro (the starting in Amsterdam 2010 and the enthusiasm for Tom win in 2017 were incredible)
Some Dutch here have an explanation ?
Other examples: Van der Poel is at the Giro. One among Mike Teunissen or Wout Van Aert could have been at Giro too (maybe only for the first 7-10 days when there are many stage thay could have won and then retire to prepare the Tour)
Sepp Kuss could have been a good leader, maybe best than Foss.
They prefer to bring in italy not their second line, but their third line !
Well obviously the Tour is more important for Jumbo and it’s predecessors, but that is the case for most teams.thank you for your answers, however it seems to me there's a more deep reason. As I wrote JV is the only "historical" team with a poor Giro tradition.
Except Menchov win and Roglic podium they never keep the Giro on focus (kru year wa a surprise)
I don't have explanations
Speaking for the Dutch many of us are big July tardsthank you for your answers, however it seems to me there's a more deep reason. As I wrote JV is the only "historical" team with a poor Giro tradition.
Except Menchov win and Roglic podium they never keep the Giro on focus (kru year wa a surprise)
I don't have explanations
Sponsor value of the Tour is tenfold of that of the Giro/Vuelta. Tour de France attracts much more people than other races. It's an event, not a cycling race.Speaking for the Dutch many of us are big July tards
Going mainstream ruins everythingSponsor value of the Tour is tenfold of that of the Giro/Vuelta. Tour de France attracts much more people than other races. It's an event, not a cycling race.
Speaking for the Dutch many of us are big July tards