• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

The 2025 CQ Ranking Manager Thread

Hi all, and welcome to the 2025 CQ Ranking Manager Game! This is the 15th edition of the game! Please see below for some history, basics, and more specific rules related to dates, dopers, etc.

History

The game was launched on December 8th 2010 by cyclingnews forum poster Hugo Koblet. His idea was to have a game where you build a cycling team from the website cqranking.com and its comprehensive numerical rankings of riders. What was originally meant to be a 25-team max competition that Hugo reserved the right to cancel if there was lack of interest became the most successful game in cyclingnews forum history, and expanded to velorooms forums (RIP) as well.

Hugo successfully ran the game for 3 years, and it bred various offshoots, such as a youth game, seasonal games (classics and GTs), emerging riders and riders in decline games. I took over organizing the main game for 2014 when Hugo got too busy, and have done so since then. See the second post in this thread for a roll of honour of yearly champions.


That is it for preamble. Let’s go through the more comprehensive set of rules:

Basics

The game is based on the point system developed by the website www.cqranking.com. Based on this system you will have to select a team of between 25 and 33 riders whose combined value doesn’t exceed 7500 points. 7500 points is normally under the mean for the ProTour teams; the median for 2024 is 7841. 7500 is closest to the amount of points team Movistar made this season, the 12th ranked of the 18 WT teams.

Your aim then is to select a team of riders who will increase their 2024 score the most during the 2025 season. The winner of the game is the one who has selected the team with the highest combined value when the game ends.


1. How the game works

1.1. Start & Finish

The season starts when the first major race (.1 or higher) giving CQ points is held and ends when the last major race is held. The winner will be crowned when the next update after the last major race is out.*

*An extension will be granted to the end of season if it is very close at the top. If any teams are within 100 points of the leader after the last major race, the season will be automatically extended until the final race of the year unless all teams within 100 points explicitly concede. As well, anyone in the top 10 can extend the season by PMing me a request to do so before the last major race starts.

(The reason for this second rule is that although minor races go through December, it is rare to have a rider in the game participate in these races, so it is sensible to end the season when people are still generally watching cycling. But if it's a very close race, it's important to crown the person who picked the best team for the year.)

1.2 Updates
Each week we will publish an update with a top 10 and a list of the high scorers and high jumpers. This will sometimes be by me, and sometimes by others – I will be setting a tentative schedule based on volunteers.

2. On doping

2.1. On ex-dopers

All riders are available to choose, except for riders who are provisionally suspended by the UCI (as of their most recent list).

Riders who have been suspended for doping and had that affect their 2024 score will not be available simply for their 2024 score. Instead, a rider’s value will be equivalent to that of his last full season; or, if he has more recently had a (not full, due to suspension) season in which he has earned more points, that season represents his value. Riders who have been suspended by the UCI (ie. Not merely provisionally suspended) are on this list.

Therefore, you can pick any rider you like, but if you want to take Onur Balkan, for example (his suspension ends in 2025), he got 24 points in 2022 prior to his suspension. This means his last 'full' season was 2021, in which he scored 51 points, which would be his cost for this game.

Hopefully the lists I've provided and the rules are clear enough, but if you make an error I will try to let you know if any of your submissions fall into this category.

2.2. Riders getting caught during the season
If you include a rider in your team who gets caught with his hands in the cookie jar, nothing happens right away. Your rider keeps his points unless the cqranking.com deletes his results before the end of the game.

Basically, the value of a rider on cqranking.com always stands.

3. Submitting your team

3.1. How do I?

You pick between 25 and 33 riders whose combined value doesn’t exceed 7500 points and send the list to me.

As I will manually have to copy/enter the teams into the Microsoft Excel file which keeps track of the scores, please be careful that you send your team to me based on the correct formula. I don’t take any responsibility for any error you might make. If I spot an error I will do my best to contact you but I can’t guarantee anything. Of course, if you have any questions feel free to ask either here in this thread or by sending a personal message.

The layout you need to use is this:

POGACAR Tadej
EVENEPOEL Remco
Etc.

Nothing else. No point scores after the name. Also, be careful that there is no “space” after the name, because I will have to delete it manually, but can't always detect these things in time for the game. If there is an error that isn't discovered until after the game starts, and that error makes your team ineligible (eg. if it puts your team over the limit) the rider will simply be deleted from the team without replacement.

To make things easier for both you and me I will link to a file for you to download in which you can type in your team and it will automatically show you the value of each rider as well as the aggregated value of your team. Then you will just have to copy your team (names only) directly from this file and send it to me.

Hopefully this clears any misunderstandings of a rider’s value as well as reduces the number of errors made in a team sent to me.

3.2. When do I?
The first race of the season will start January 9, so I want to have your team in hand on January 8 at the latest.

There are two deadlines: a submission deadline and a revision/publication deadline, spaced 24 hours apart. This is to address the issue brought up in recent years about whether it is 'fair' to allow changes after teams have seen the teams of other players, and for 'late' submissions. I would like to make this a game that is accessible to as many people as possible, yet preserve that element of fairness. So, the submission deadline will be when I want to have received all the teams. The revision and publication deadline is to allow a 24-hour period for me to look over the teams and allow a chance to people to change their team in case of error, before having access to a list of riders that other teams picked. If you get mixed up with the time zone or unexpectedly don't have internet access around the submission deadline, I will accept teams up to the revision deadline at my discretion, but if allowed those teams will not have the chance to revise in case of error.

The submission deadline is 23:59 (CET) January 7th, so early January 8th for Aussies and sometime earlier on January 7th for North Americans. The revision and publication deadline is 24 hours later; I would ask that people refrain from posting the riders on their team until after that, so midnight CET on the start of January 9th.

Please note that even though the racing season is over, it is always possible that CQ will adjust points for an earlier season race for whatever reason (eg. readjusting points for suspended dopers) Be mindful of these changes.

cqranking.com usually uploads the final update of the season on December 31, and the values in this update are the ones we’re using. However, the changes are usually very small so there’s no reason why you can’t start selecting your team already today!

Disclaimer: ensuring your team is full of eligible riders and is on budget is your responsibility. If I notice you are over budget or have an ineligible rider I will send you a message, but if you don't get back to me in time, or I don't catch it before the deadline, I will simply remove one rider to make your budget work. Obviously it is to your advantage to be able to choose all your riders, so please be diligent.

Create Your Team


Hugo created a very helpful file in 2012, referred to above, that helps avoid any errors in calculation and helps ensure you are formatting your rider names correctly. I would encourage everyone to use this option, especially if you are not confident in your spreadsheet creating skills. Please use the file attached here to create your team, then copy and paste the rider names to send to me by PM once you have it correct. Thank you.

note: the 'create your team' file has not yet been manually updated to include different scores for dopers as per rule 2.1, so it is currently wholly your responsibility to account for this.

I think that about covers everything. If you have any questions or if I forgot to add or explain anything, please let me know.
 
I'm going to reserve the second post in the thread for a list of teams who have submitted, as they come in, as well as list an honour roll of top finishers throughout the years.

As of 2:00am on January 7th CET, here are the 65 teams that have submitted a team (asterisk next to the team name means there are issues you need to clean up with me before your team is confirmed:

EvansIsTheBest
Laurens147
NorthAmericanScum
Lortnoc
jon_ezeitza
hayneplane
Leadbelly
Search
vladimir
marksi
Salvarani
abbulf
ingsve
Shakes
zigzag wanderer
Sneekes
RedheadDane
R_O_Shipman
Rufs
Senderos
Total Package
Fivezzz
shalgo
trackstand
triley36
Qazaqstan
Mushroom
nbfc1962
Anderis
laarland
LosBrolin
Popchu
armchairclimber
Jpettersen
hfgon1
DJ Sprtsch
Earns1984
SafeBet
Armchair Cyclist
del1962
Rakim*
Berflamand
Hugo Koblet
DJW
18-Valve(pithy)
repre*
firefly3233
bminchow
Nevs
Mountain Newts*
Devil's Elbow
MADRAZO
Object
HoudiniCycling
adamski101
Blues in the bottle*
Josedin
tobydawq
ray10*
the asian
Googolplex
escartin
Kazistuta
Kwiato & Co.*
Wvv




Winners:

2011 – 87 participants: ingsve – 13897 points
2012 – 129 participants: skidmark – 19345 points
2013 – 132 participants: SteelyDan – 13094 points
2014 – 150 participants: Pentacycle – 14367 points
2015 – 155 participants: Cykeltyven – 16209 points
2016 – 144 participants: skidmark – 15392 points
2017 – 131 participants: fauniera – 15867 points
2018 – 129 participants: ruvu75 – 16513 points
2019 - 114 participants: fauniera - 14579 points
2020 - 113 participants: bminchow - 10010 points
2021 - 93 participants: Object - 19129 points
2022 - 91 participants: EvansIsTheBest - 18662 points
2023 - 103 participants: Bluesinthebottle - 16336 points
2024 - 94 participants: Shalgo - 16355 points
 
Last edited:
Dec 11, 2011
7
2
8,535
I am looking forward to another year. Thanks to skidmark for putting in all the work!

Started following my team on strava last edition, added another layer to the game. Maybe will try to include social media this year as well.
 
Seeing the prices for 2025, I don't have much trust in myself to pick a competitive team.
Ya, it's going to be very interesting to see what choices people make. There are several riders that fulfill a lot of the basic criteria for being picked in this game but that I simply don't trust. It's going to be interesting to see if any of those riders get a high popularity score and then whether I was right or not to be skeptical.
 
My initial research brought me 135 kinda interesting candidates for my team but so far only 8 made it to the provisional selection. The rest doesn't seem like winning picks to me, really. Last year I had a much clearer idea of who I wanted to pick.
 
My initial research brought me 135 kinda interesting candidates for my team but so far only 8 made it to the provisional selection. The rest doesn't seem like winning picks to me, really. Last year I had a much clearer idea of who I wanted to pick.
I was gonna say that surely there are more obvious picks that than but looking at it, a lot of the picks are perhaps not automatic but depends more on your personal assessment of their potential.
 
  • Like
Reactions: abbulf
The more I look at it, the more I think this will go down as the year where the teams were the most similar.
I'm not so sure about that. I think there are quite a few false friends that look good on the surface but that are problematic enough for some people to reject them and since everyone will be rejecting different of these false friends it will serve to make the selections more diverse.

That said, my prediction would be that if we have say 100 participants, there will of course be at least a handful of picks that will be in the 60-80% popularity range which is typical for obvious picks (especially as some teams forego conventions like RedheadDane etc.) But then there will perhaps be more than usual number of riders in the 30% picked range which would be these types of picks I'm talking about that look good but that people will reject for various reasons.
 
Last edited:
Team submitted!
Quite old team for me this year (over 26 average), so I hope a few veterans that had a lousy 2024 for different reasons can bounce back in 2025. And to my own surpise zero zero pointers made the final cut, even though there were a few on my shorlist. I hope the game will still be very popular, and that we will reach at least 100 teams for 2025.
Good luck to everyone, and hope for an exciting 2025 edition!