All you guys talking about how Andy doesn't belong on the list,

you couldn't be more wrong. If anything he should be higher up the list.......lol just kidding.
Anyway, that list is filled with questionable conclusions, including:
TJVG, Porte, Martin, Boonen etc. in late professional days? (Wiggins is the only one of these guys that has shown signs of already having achieved the best he will achieve. The others could easily still achieve a lot throughout the rest of their career).
Froomes problem is his team? (Sky's one of the strongest in the peloton, and the team doesn't matter as much when you are the strongest rider).
Contador still the man to beat in every race? (used to be the case, not quite anymore).
A shame Cance won't focus on stages? (classics>stages)
I think I'll stick with CQ for determining who the best are.