Slavique Nuke
BANNED
Are you seriously suggesting that the fat guy is a sub 14 minute runner in 5 kilometres? Joke of the yearHe does not.
Id love to see you run a sub 14 min 5k.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Are you seriously suggesting that the fat guy is a sub 14 minute runner in 5 kilometres? Joke of the yearHe does not.
Id love to see you run a sub 14 min 5k.
He most definitely is. The reason why the fat guy has won so much, is that he usually outruns everybody who makes it to the running leg in the front group.Are you seriously suggesting that the fat guy is a sub 14 minute runner in 5 kilometres? Joke of the year
Are you seriously suggesting that the fat guy is a sub 14 minute runner in 5 kilometres? Joke of the year
You do realise that the the kind of body that seems "fat" within the world of cycling is actually... just pretty average?
he’s run sub 14 atleast 2 times in officially control measured courses. He’s an Olympic Champion and the guy he beat to win that gold medal in Tokyo (they started the running part together) had at that time officially recorded both a 13:26 5k and a 27:51 10000m times.Are you seriously suggesting that the fat guy is a sub 14 minute runner in 5 kilometres? Joke of the year
Someone needs to tell Lustenko to stop entering billions of stage races he can't finish, and to make the switch to ironman!!I think Blummenfelt's stocky profile suggests more the type who wins a Tour of Turkey or Romania mountain stage from the GC group in comical fashion against guys half his size and gets immediately popped for straight up EPO after the stage, becoming a clinic legend and being referenced constantly for the next 20 years. It's a respectable niche, perhaps Torku Sekerspor can offer him a trial if they're still around.
Top triathlete just means 'outrun the other good swimmers' becoming cyclist makes leas amount of sense possbile
I've seen many fat shot putters over the years, and I'm sure I can put the shot further than them. I might have to use a crane though.
Sure, but you still have to be able to execute that technique, and people often underestimate the physical credentials it takes to do that because a lot of athletes in the power throwing events tend to be hulking and heavy-set. You'd say in terms of "perceived" athleticism from most to least, it goes from javelin to discus, to hammer, to shot put, simply because of what you'd perceive as a "typical" build for each, but crucially they're still professional athletes, it's not like their workout regime consists of eating Twinkies and occasionally spinning round a couple of times to hurl a heavy ball 20+ metres. Ryan Crouser is a hulking great bear of a man and certainly no bodybuilder physique, but while he has insane strength, it's not just being "stronger than the rest" that is why he has been a dominant figure in the discipline for years; if you ever see the field athletes warming up, you'd be stunned at some of the flexibility and gymnastic capability that should not be physically possible from a guy that size.Shot putting is a sport that does not require a whole lot of movement, just spinning in a circle, as it's a strength/technique based sport.
If you do sitting shot putting you're not even spinning in a circle, coz you're strapped to a (non-spinning) chair.
I love a good off topic discussion, so:A elite level shotputter can outrun above average sprinter specialists 9 out of 10 times in shorter distances up to 60m. The shorter the faster.
Ryan Crouser is reported to run under 4.8s in 40 metres, which translates to close to 7.0s in 60 metres.
A good shot putter has unreal reaction times and 10m speed, until endurance starts to kick in.
It's basically rugby for people who don't like bruisesMan, if the walking beer belly that is Jason Kelce could have been the best center in the game for about 10 years straight, the NFL can't be that hard.
How hard is it to read a wikipedia page? I assume you have the time, you're out here posting on this obscure forum.Are you seriously suggesting that the fat guy is a sub 14 minute runner in 5 kilometres? Joke of the year
Shh . . . don’t let his knees, shoulders, spine, ankles, or feet hear that, they will want to have a word with you 😜Man, if the walking beer belly that is Jason Kelce could have been the best center in the game for about 10 years straight, the NFL can't be that hard.
The kind of body that seems “fat” in cycling seems skinny in the U.S.You do realise that the the kind of body that seems "fat" within the world of cycling is actually... just pretty average?
I’ll take that betHahahahahhahahaha it's good somebody is finally calling out the Mickey mouses sport that's triathlon. I bet this guy times for 5k and marathon are all fake. Just gets paid to be constantly on holiday doing z2 workouts and eating 8000 calories
Above average around the spectre of participants - national and regional level. Athletes with PB between 7.0 and 7.2 in 60m and 11.0 and 11.3 in 100m. Times that still require dedication and many hours of practice to achieve. Of course, the shorter the distance the better.I love a good off topic discussion, so:
What do you level are you talking about when you say “above average sprint specialist”? the guys that are running 100 meter in around 10.00 and competing at national level or guys more running like 10:30 and competing at national level?
(Worth keeping in mind Duplantis ran 10.37 in his show duel vs Warholm)
4.80 in 40 meter is a fast time, but the good sprinters would still wash the ground with him. If he could do a time close to 7.00 in 60 meter that is really impressive, but Coleman’s world record is 6.41 and a bunch of very mediocre sprinters would do below 7.00. Even the best women go below 7.00 in 60m.
I think the average 10.20s 100meter sprinter would clean Crouser and the other best shot putters in distances probably from 30 meters, definitively on 40 meter and longer. 50-60 meter they would probably be pretty even or maybe getting beaten by the best female sprinters.
So a professional athlete in another sport could hold their ground against “amateurs” that are way behind even the best women in that other sport, that’s not a big surprise. a better measurement is probably comparing things like this to the elite of women, and they run below 7 60s and below 11 100s.Above average around the spectre of participants - national and regional level. Athletes with PB between 7.0 and 7.2 in 60m and 11.0 and 11.3 in 100m. Times that still require dedication and many hours of practice to achieve. Of course, the shorter the distance the better.
If he had played rugby I would have nothing to fear because they wouldn't be able to have a word with me.Shh . . . don’t let his knees, shoulders, spine, ankles, or feet hear that, they will want to have a word with you 😜
Also lovely to read these people crapping all over triathlon athletes.
If you're off that opinion I'm just going to assume your strategy in the swimming part would be to let your 25% body fat keep you afloat whilst the current drifts you towards the end.
Even more amazing when one remembers that, of the top 10 riders in the peloton, 2 just waltzed into cycling after careers in the "lower sports" of ski stomping and fishball packing, another was a footballer until late teens and 2 others were primarily cyclocross riders who dominated road races as an afterthought.Also lovely to read these people crapping all over triathlon athletes.