the only one who brought the TdF into this was one of the race directors in some comments to the local press, most of which could be filed in the waste bin for their value.
I think most of us are realistic enough, especially in womens pro cycling, that TdF standards are impossibly high for alot of races to meet, you could argue even the TdFF doesnt quite meet them yet.
so absolutely I agree there are various degrees of safety that are acceptable for pro cycling on roads, no-ones demanding all roads should be locked down completely for hours,and the UCI classification of races gives some clue as the levels to expect.
what I dont think is unreasonable for a pro cycling race though is to say the minimum standard should be that all static road obstacles are properly signed by marshalls so riders can avoid them and know they arent dealing with people who at any second might start moving again, and that theres absolutely no moving non race vehicle within the bubble around the leaders/peloton, there is a point at which riders who get spat out the back on races have to fend for themselves, and that happens in top level events.
but no-one should be riding in a race and suddenly having to decide which way to go to avoid a bus moving towards them, or overtaking a car as theyre building up to a finish.
or having just read Eva van Agts account, what we didnt see on Fridays stage was there was only one moto marshall, who was following the leaders in Lourdes, in the 2nd group that she was in, the roads were completely open, and team cars/medic cars were getting caught up in the traffic.