The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
ElChingon said:Now CN reports (through Gazzeta of course) that Mark Cavendish missed one test last year. Only one so no ruling needed (right?) till three strikes?
Frosty said:Cavendish replies
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/cavendish-admits-to-missed-drug-test-in-2011
Says he was with a film crew and it was an administrative error.
The Hitch said:Im interested to know how many out of competition tests do cyclists have.
How does that compare to other sports.
Obviously if people only get 1 a year and they miss it its different but if Offredo missed 3, how many out of competition tests did he have?
Im interested because if Cav's alleged missed test gets out, the haters of cycling might say that thats another cyclist doping or some **** like that.
ElChingon said:Excuses are like .... will they give everyone else an excuse waiver?
ElChingon said:Excuses are like .... will they give everyone else an excuse waiver?
ElChingon said:Excuses are like .... will they give everyone else an excuse waiver?
"It's part of the job and it's my job to make sure I don't miss another."
If you are an enthusiastic defender of anti-doping then fill out your whereabouts form in time or accept that you made a mistake (twice!)."I am an enthusiastic defender of the anti-doping fight. I wonder, is cycling?"
Zinoviev Letter said:Cavendish has a right to be seriously annoyed about a single missed test being revealed. It is absolutely no indication of doping, yet it will damage his public reputation.
Zinoviev Letter said:He doesn't need an excuse. One missed test is not a doping violation, for the very good reason that with the best will in the world sometimes an athlete will screw up, forget to update their whereabouts, head off somewhere else for some reason and get delayed, etc. Three missed tests within the allotted time period is a doping violation, as that distinguished between a pattern of missing tests and an accidentally missed test.
Cavendish has a right to be seriously annoyed about a single missed test being revealed. It is absolutely no indication of doping, yet it will damage his public reputation.
ElChingon said:One must wonder who reported it to Gazzetta, must of been someone within UCI/WADA. The Italians going after more big fish to fry? If not tenderize.
The Hitch said:Im interested to know how many out of competition tests do cyclists have.
How does that compare to other sports.
Obviously if people only get 1 a year and they miss it its different but if Offredo missed 3, how many out of competition tests did he have?
Im interested because if Cav's alleged missed test gets out, the haters of cycling might say that thats another cyclist doping or some **** like that.
Quixote said:I hate thinking the worst here because I appreciate what Cav has already accomplished in his young career. However, observing tests and controls is part of the "job". He seems to be very good at all other aspects of the job, so why have a brainfart when it comes to the one that could lead to suspicious conclusions. His "story" of why he missed the test needs to be thoroughly investigated for his sake.
Polyarmour said:60 tests per year and he missed one. You think that's grounds for a Spanish Inquisition? You've never missed a meeting at work, been late for work, got a date wrong?
Quixote said:I repeat that I am a Cav fan and I hope that this concludes in his favor. However, this is not like showing up to work late, it's more like showing up to work with no pants. A Spanish Inquisition is not required (at least no racks), but let's, at the minimum, check out his story and see if it makes floats.