I have gone through the entire document, skipping through some of the last parts that reiterate the court cases. It’s much as I thought it would be. The witness testimony is extremely comprehensive and damning. Among some of the highlights:
Betsy Andreu observed a delivery from Marti to Armstrong following a dinner at the Villa d’Este Restaurant in Nice in 1999. The dinner involved Lance and Kristin Armstrong,Betsy Andreu, Kevin Livingston and his fiancé, and Pepe and his girlfriend.
Dinner was held later than usual. The explanation Andreu was given was that dinner was so late because the purpose of Pepe’s attendance in Nice was to bring EPO to Lance, and it was safer to cross the border at night. After the dinner the Armstrongs took Andreu home. Andreu saw Pepe give Lance Armstrong a brown paper bag and as Armstrong opened the car door for Andreu he smiled, held up the bag and commented, “liquid gold.”
(p. 28, bottom numbering system)
GH warns LA by text that testers are coming, right after LA told GH he took testosterone, so LA dropped out of the race. (39-40)
Hincapie was well aware that Armstrong used blood doping in every Tour de France from 2001through 2005.
(64)
Not only did Armstrong encourage riders to work with Ferrari, but, as Christian Vande Velde testified in Section IV.B.5.e., in 2002, Armstrong played the enforcer for Ferrari’s doping advice. When Armstrong learned that Vande Velde was not strictly adhering to the doping regimen prescribed by Ferrari (including regular use of EPO and testosterone), Armstrong came down hard on Vande Velde in a meeting involving Armstrong, Vande Velde and Ferrari inArmstrong’s Girona, Spain apartment, following the 2002 Tour de France.Armstrong made it very clear to Vande Velde that if he did not shape up and conform to Ferrari’s doping program that Vande Velde would soon be kicked off the team.Vande Velde got the message and immediately stepped up his Ferrari-developed doping program
(95)
Scene where Zabriskie, who took up racing to get away from the memories of his drug-addicted father, was essentially forced to dope by JB. He said he returned to his room later and cried (112-14)
Wrt some other issues:
1) hard science: there is nothing about new positives. There is nothing about other drugs, such as HemAssist. There is nothing new about the TdS samples, other than an insistence that they would have been definitely positive under today’s criteria. Wrt the blood values, here is the key passage:
When Prof. Gore compared the suppressed reticulocyte percentage in Armstrong’s 2009 and 2010 Tour de France samples to the reticulocyte percentage in his other samples, Prof. Gore concluded that the approximate likelihood of Armstrong’s seven suppressed reticulocyte values during the 2009 and 2010 Tours de France occurring naturally was less thanone in a million
(p. 140; numbering system on bottom of page)
I’m not sure, but if this means that Gore subjected the values to the software used in the passport system, it would definitely have raised a red flag and been sent to an expert panel. If this is the case, USADA should try to find out if the data were in fact sent to a panel, and if so, why the panel did not conclude doping. OTOH, Gore’s analysis may not be based on the software. If that is the case, why not? That is the relevant analysis to use here.
On the same subject, I found it very interesting that LA told Vaughters he learned from Conconi how the EPO test worked (p. 51). Also:
Vaughters testified that Armstrong had an awareness of the aspects of the molecular structure of the EPO product Aranesp that would make that product easy to detect. Vaughters’ conversation with Armstrong on these topics preceded the positive drug tests for Aranesp (also known as Dynepo) involving several athletes at the 2002 Winter Olympic Games
(96-7)
This contrasts sharply with LA’s public statement in 2005, on the Larry King show, pretending he didn’t even know if EPO was tested in blood or urine. Likewise, he pretended he knew nothing about actovegin, when in fact the entire team was using it.
It should be kept in mind that Armstrong’s and the team’s cover up concerning Actovegin was made in response to an official French law enforcement investigation. The fact that Armstrong and team officials were willing to make false statements in the course of a law enforcement investigation regarding doping directly bears on evaluation of the credibility of their statements regarding the use of other products. In other words, if Lance Armstrong was willing to lie about Actovegin—and he clearly did lie about Actovegin— there is little reason to believe that Armstrong would not be willing to lie about other products and with regard to other topics.
(p. 45)
A discussion of Ferrari’s notational system:
Multiple handwritten training plans for Kevin Livingston were found in Dr. Ferrari’sf iles during a search of his residence in the first investigation of Dr. Ferrari. The cyclists who have worked with Dr. Ferrari describe handwritten training plans prepared by Dr. Ferrari, and have testified that he placed notations on their plans to indicate the dates on which they were supposed to use performance enhancing drugs. Multiple asterisks are an evident feature on all of the training plans in the file for Kevin Livingston. Another feature on one of the plans in the file is a series of two dots side by side immediately prior to the workout description on three consecutive days and a single dot on the fourth day.
2) paper trails:
The bank records related to Ferrari’s Swiss company reflect that on July 2, 2004, the day before the 2004 Tour de France, Ferrari’s company was wired $100,000.00 from Lance Armstrong’s account in the United States.
(p. 69)
On March 29, 2005, Armstrong wired Ferrari one hundred thousand dollars($100,000.00) to the Swiss account of Health & Performance. Also in March 2005,Armstrong attended a training camp with Dr. Ferrari on the island of Tenerife. Armstrong invited Levi Leipheimer to Tenerife and introduced Leipheimer to Ferrari.
Leipheimer became a client of Ferrari at this time and immediately began receiving doping advice from Dr. Ferrari.
(p. 78)
This is followed by a discussion of how Stapleton had to know this at the SCA hearing, and thus lied when he said LA had no relationship with Ferrari, as did Fabiani much later.
Bill Stapleton is the same man who went into corporate boardrooms around America seeking sponsor dollars, looked top executives in the eye and told them Lance Armstrong was not doping. These were not new issues, and if anyone knew what was going on between Armstrong and Ferrari it was Stapleton
(79)
as made clear by the statements of both Mr. Armstrong and his agent at their depositions, Mr. Armstrong engaged in a carefully calculated effort to continue his sporting fraud and cover up his relationship with Ferrari
(81)
On September 1, 2009, Stefano writes, “Schumi asked me if you could process the payment (25.000 EUR) for the season as agreed last March. You can forward the payment when’s best for you to my account in MC [Monte Carlo].”To which Armstrong responds, “Can I pay it in cash when I see you?”
(p. 85)
The foregoing examples from 2009 and 2010 constitute only a small sample of the communications (including emails, meetings and phone calls) which occurred between Armstrong and Michele Ferrari before April 15, 2010, when Mark Fabiani, acting on behalf of Lance Armstrong, issued his unambiguous denial of a professional relationship between Armstrong and Ferrari and said that Armstrong and Ferrari had not seen each other in a year. Fabiani’s statement on behalf of Armstrong was a lie.
(86)
Also this:
Much more than “occasional advice on training” is also reflected in payments made by Armstrong to a Swiss company controlled by Dr. Ferrari known as “Health & Performance SA.”Included among the records for this company is an invoice to Lance Armstrong for “Training and osteopath consulting.” Bank statements and corporate accounting records for the company document payments from Armstrong totaling more than a million dollars
(p. 99)
And on p. 107, there is a chart summarizing La’s payments to Ferrari
In 2009 Levi Leipheimer asked Armstrong whether he was still working with “Schumi.”Armstrong said that he was, “through a middle person.” Through the assistance of Italian authorities USADA has discovered that this middle person was Ferrari’s son, Stefano Ferrari, who regularly forwarded to Armstrong Michele’s training plans for Armstrong. Many of these communications took place via email, and the emails obtained by USADA plainly reflect that Stefano Ferrari merely served as a conduit for his father’s training advice. The emails also indicate that from time to time Armstrong communicated directly with Dr. Ferrari, including, as noted above, participating in meetings with him
(83)
This is followed by transcripts of emails between LA and Stefano F. discussing “Schumi”
3) Intimidation. In addition to the incidents the Clinic is aware of, there is discussion of what appears to be intimidation of Levi and his wife (150-151)
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram