Armchair Cyclist
Moderator
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I thought Tour results took precedence so Pogacars 1/1/3 is better than Menchovs 1/3/1I've taken the liberty of alphabetising Pogacar after fellow 1/1/3 acheivers Fignon and Menchov.
That’s how I thought it was to when originally conceived.I thought Tour results took precedence so Pogacars 1/1/3 is better than Menchovs 1/3/1
Last year I proposed a slight reworking:I thought Tour results took precedence so Pogacars 1/1/3 is better than Menchovs 1/3/1
This received 5 thumbs up (including SafeBet, who seems to be the main updater now), and one, equivocating, response against, which received 1 thumbs up. My edit on the post-Giro table received a thumbs up from SafeBet, whose table I altered.A slight reworking:
I have (as I proposed after the Giro) made number of podiums (actually, number of different GTs in which they have a podium) as a higher stratum for sorting (Jalabert drops, Fernandez Blanco is biggest gainer);
Where total is the same, I have sorted by number of wins, then 2nds, 3rds etc;
Riders still unseparated are sorted alphabetically (I couldn't see what pattern was there previously);
Your current system works perfectly!Last year I proposed a slight reworking:
This received 5 thumbs up (including SafeBet, who seems to be the main updater now), and one, equivocating, response against, which received 1 thumbs up. My edit on the post-Giro table received a thumbs up from SafeBet, whose table I altered.
Not really a battle worth fighting that much over: should we have a response emoticons vote to decide, or let Safebet consider it his project to do with as he chooses, or what?