• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Teams & Riders The Remco Evenepoel is the next Eddy Merckx thread

Page 1132 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Should we change the thread title?


  • Total voters
    131
I don't buy the Olympics as an excuse for his poor form now at all.
Dont you know that when you win the Olympic Double you are obligated to celebrate for two weeks eating belgium chokolate and pommes?

@KoopaCycling Even without the Olympics Remco would've still been like 4th or 5th in the UCI rankings so far this season. 3rd in the Tour, WC TT, stage wins in the Tour, Dauphine and Paris-Nice wouldve been a great season for most cyclists when a crash is hindering you from taking part in the main goal of the spring season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gregrowlerson
Weird argument. It's like saying: "Without the cobbled classics, Van de Poel would have had a mediocre season". The point is that they set objectives and Remco was able to tick his off (as MvdP did).
And as said before: the Olympics kind of jeopardized the autumn races for him. Just like last year's focus on the WCTT in august did not allow for a decent preparation of the Vuelta.
I'd love him to have a more balanced (crashless) season in which he's 100% prepared for the WC & the Italian classics.
So basically you agree with me that without the Olympics his season would not be considered great for a rider of his stature. His season would have been okay (3rd at TdF, winning TT WC ain't nothing to scoff at) but just okay for a rider of his stature. The olympics are what made this season memorable/good for Remco.

Reality is, Remco would have started this year with the believe he could win a great deal more than he actually won. He wanted to win Paris-Nice, Basque, at least 1 race from Fleche, Amstel, LBL, He would have wanted to go into the dauphine with better form needing only to finetune. Thus allowing him to win Belgian TT on the trot just by being able to show up.

I'm not saying Remco did not have a great season. he had, cause of how special that Olympic double is. But without that OG double I personally believe he would look back on this season with some dissapointment i'm sure. Happy with the TT WC title, and the podium but not fully satisfied. Now with OG double he will be satisfied with this season when looking back.
 
I'm not saying Remco did not have a great season. he had, cause of how special that Olympic double is. But without that OG double I personally believe he would look back on this season with some dissapointment i'm sure.
But this basically go for every single rider if you remove the biggest results, so it's a pretty meaningless measurement.

For MvdP this season would be horrible without the RVV-Roubaix double, for Roglic this season would be really bad without the Vuelta win, Remcos 2023 season wouldve been a big disappointment without the Liege and WC ITT title. and so on for basically everyone else than Pogacar.
 
But this basically go for every single rider if you remove the biggest results, so it's a pretty meaningless measurement.

For MvdP this season would be horrible without the RVV-Roubaix double, for Roglic this season would be really bad without the Vuelta win, Remcos 2023 season wouldve been a big disappointment without the Liege and WC ITT title. and so on for basically everyone else than Pogacar.
Everyone who won something have had a great season?
 
And that makes everyone who won something having a great season. It's logical.
No it doesn't at all. There is literally no correlation between "if you remove the biggest wins a rider takes, the season for most riders looks a lot worse" and "everyone who won something having a great season".

Remove the win(s) and the season isn't great, same for Pogi the 🐐.
Yes, that's exactly my point. That it's a stupid measurement to remove the biggest victories...
 
Ofcourse it's a great season for Evenepoel. But at the same time it's not encouraging in other ways that he's only managed to peak for 2 races this year and that Pogacar essentially covers his entire range of big targets he can win and more.
To be fair we didnt get to see him in his planned spring peak as he crashed out of in Itzulia. A season with an Ardenne peak, a Tour + Olympics peak and a somewhat half peak good enough for WC ITT gold and 5th in road race would've looked pretty good.

Problem is of course that Pogacar is on a complete different level.
 
Some riders who managed to win something worth mentioning, have had a great season?
Not necessarily.
If Toms Skuijns win RvV it's been a great season no matter what he does otherwise. If Pogacar wins Liege but nothing else it's not been a great season for him. I think that's pretty obvious.

Still this is not at all relevant to my point about "removing the big wins" a rider actually won to argue the season doesn't look that good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Not necessarily.
If Toms Skuijns win RvV it's been a great season no matter what he does otherwise. If Pogacar wins Liege but nothing else it's not been a great season for him. I think that's pretty obvious.

Still this is not at all relevant to my point about "removing the big wins" a rider actually won to argue the season doesn't look that good.
Riders who managed to win something they target, more than 1 win is required for some riders, or win something unexpected, have a great season?
 
  • Love
Reactions: Andre
Riders who managed to win something they target, more than 1 win is required for some riders, or win something unexpected, have a great season?
There isn't one objective measurement for a great season that applies for all riders. I honestly have no idea what you're on about, and why you are spamming me with these questions that are not related to what I said in the posts that led to you asking these "important questions"
 
like I said before, he is not a natural rider like Pog that can rather easy get to 80/90% and then just ride a few races to become top. Not saying these guys have it easy, but Remco needs more. He always seems to need a rather longish and perfect preparation to get to top form. Might be that he was unlucky a few times, or that falls/ injuries were worse then thought but still. If this continues I don’t see him having a very long career. It will take more out of him each time to even get close to Pog, Vinge, let alone beat them. Doesn’t seem like the guy that will do this 12 times and never win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Salvarani