You think he can win Pologne?I’m getting that 2020 vibe again.
Rest assured I don't follow anyone's posts enough to know why you seem triggered by my comments, but do heckle on!Whose memo?
SwitserlandiaOnce again.
So what's the next test?
Heckle? I'm not aggressive nor offensive, I point out how tiring and lame the countless strawmen of 'detractors' are. As if the world is united in hating him and no one ever gives him credit.Rest assured I don't follow anyone's posts enough to know why you seem triggered by my comments, but do heckle on!
By the time he graduates from all these tests, he'll die of old age. Maybe that's why Valverde is still riding.Switserlandia
There's a point. He might have been able to beat riders of his own age today but would he have beaten a 42 year old?By the time he graduates from all these tests, he'll die of old age. Maybe that's why Valverde is still riding.
He did in San Sebastian but everyone was tired from the Tour and no one really cares about such a minor classic.There's a point. He might have been able to beat riders of his own age today but would he have beaten a 42 year old?
indeed, maybe time to revisit the outcome of the 2020 giro without The Crash...Well he beat Tao Goegeghan Hart handsomely in a critical preparation phase, so not exactly chopped liver.
This post makes it look like all these guys died before 20 (and achieved a surprising amount in their short lives).Win 28 puts Evenepoel ahead of Belgian cycling legend
Briek Schotte (1939-1959) (27 wins)- 2x world champion, 2x RvV winner for wins
Ties him at 46th place for Belgians in wins with Belgian legends
Andre Dierickx (1968-1981) 2x winner La Fleche Wallonne, 2x stage wins Dauphine, 2nd RvV, 2nd Paris Roubaix, 2nd LBL
Jean Aerts - (1927-1936) 1x world champion, 12 stages TDF, 1x Belgian RR champion, 3rd RvV, 3rd Paris Roubaix
Raymond Impanis (1946-1963) - 2x GC Paris-Nice, 1x winner Paris Roubaix, 1x winner RvV, 1x LaFleche Wallonne, 2x winner Gent-Wevelgem, 4x runner-up LBL, 3 GC La Vuelta
To fulfill his prophecy as the true heir to the great Spilak.Switserlandia
Sure but we don't have relaible kermesse records for older riders, and ultiamtely we can only compare across similar/same races.You also can't compare their victories like that. Schotte and Aerts, for instance, have won many smaller Belgian races which were worth a lot more to them back then.
Sure, but I don't think it tells you that much. If these riders had been riding today, they would probably have had more pro wins than that.Sure but we don't have relaible kermesse records for older riders, and ultiamtely we can only compare across similar/same races.
Also, I would love to get a good valuation system to rate riders that does an excellent job of rating the value of a win.
I wsa jsut posting what appears to be the win totals in races that currently count as pro wins.
no. stick with the plan as is.If Remco wins Suisse, QS HAS to let him race the tour then. He'd be in shape to contend. Plus, more TT km
If he lays an egg, stick with the Vuelta plan
With the cobles stage in the tour and all the media attention in Belgium? No way, in all scenario's he should stick to the initial plan and do the vuelta. Otherwise they make the same error as last year.If Remco wins Suisse, QS HAS to let him race the tour then. He'd be in shape to contend. Plus, more TT km
If he lays an egg, stick with the Vuelta plan
The probability is definitely not zero.The Vuelta I can see him do top 5 but no way he wins.
Sometimes a good result in Dauphine/Suisse can also mean the rider has peaked too early and will burn out during the Tour. But if he could win a few stages before then it obviously wouldn't be bad for the team.If Remco wins Suisse, QS HAS to let him race the tour then. He'd be in shape to contend. Plus, more TT km
If he lays an egg, stick with the Vuelta plan